SovereignGrace
Certified Flunky
Foreknowledge is not just merely knowing ahead of time. It’s God’s way of electing the lost sheep to Himself.You're saying foreknowledge takes away attributes from God? How do you get that?
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Foreknowledge is not just merely knowing ahead of time. It’s God’s way of electing the lost sheep to Himself.You're saying foreknowledge takes away attributes from God? How do you get that?
Much love!
Foreknowledge is not just merely knowing ahead of time. It’s God’s way of electing the lost sheep to Himself.
Again, what conditions do the lost meet the cross didn’t?
#I’llbewaiting
It’s a verb. It’s God doing something. Whom He foreknew, foreknew being a verb, means it’s not mere knowledge, but Him electing sinners.Really? No its not. Its knowing ahead of time.
I gave you an example for the Bible that refutes that definition.
Much love!
Then everybody w/o exception are saved if the cross is for all w/o exception.Jesus did all the work on the cross.
We have torn down your house of cards theology. Why tear down what’s already been torn down?Why not if y'all go back and actually address my posts instead of deflecting away from them?
But I know why.
It’s a verb. It’s God doing something. Whom He foreknew, foreknew being a verb, means it’s not mere knowledge, but Him electing sinners.
If all are included in the cross of the Christ, and John isn’t saved, then how was it the cross didn’t save him?Jesus did all the work on the cross.
OK, then we're done.We have torn down your house of cards theology. Why tear down what’s already been torn down?
#redundant
But it’s more than just knowing beforehead. Words have what is called a semantic range.That's right, a verb.
To know, is a verb. To know in advance, still a verb.
But the meaning is just that, to know in advance. That's what the word says, that's what it means, and that's how it is used. Word substitution is not, to me, a valid method of Biblical interpretation.
But that's just me.
Much love!
Actually I'm taking this thought from quite a number of verses.
Let's see the one you are referencing:
1 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;
2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.
3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
7 Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.
8 I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.
This sounds rather inclusive to me.
?
Passive aggressive much?I don't know why you bother Mark..these two are among the most unfriendly and disagreeable posters on the Site bar one... don't waste your self on them.
I apologize for them ..so sorry.
And the other thing? God knowing all who would choose him, that he would pay their sin debt, also paid the sin debt of all others in hell. Hmmm. Double jeopardy, they're in hell paying a debt that was accepted as paid by the Son to the Father.They say God saw who would and who wouldn’t and elected accordingly. That’s their (twisted, warped, grotesque) view of election. If God had to see this, then He didn’t know this. Another attribute they have taken from Him. Hey, He’s looking more like molech by the second.
And yet we’re the disagreeable ones who defend God’s sovereignty over man’s. Oh the horror.And the other thing? God knowing all who would choose him, that he would pay their sin debt, also paid the sin debt of all others in hell. Hmmm. Double jeopardy, they're in hell paying a debt that was accepted as paid by the Son to the Father.
No, you’re not getting off the hook this easy. If the cross met every condition for all mankind and all mankind is not saved, what conditions did those who are saved meet?OK, then we're done.
Much love!
We defend God...not that He needs it...but we still defend Him. You defend man’s god of free will. But I’m the hater, right?I don't know why you bother Mark..these two are among the most unfriendly and disagreeable posters on the Site bar one... don't waste your self on them.
I apologize for them ..so sorry.
@Preacher4Truth if we go with the flow, the flower power of God is love, that He tries His hardest to save everybody, that He loves all up until the day of judgment, then He changes that love to full blown hatred, we’d be the toast of the town here.And the other thing? God knowing all who would choose him, that he would pay their sin debt, also paid the sin debt of all others in hell. Hmmm. Double jeopardy, they're in hell paying a debt that was accepted as paid by the Son to the Father.