Dave L: ""The bible says the gifts expired as scripture replaced them. And history confirms this."
You keep pontificating this nonsense, but never consider the fact that no academic commentary on Acts and 1 Corinthians supports your cultic interpretation of 1 Corinthians 1:8 and 13:8-12. And you are incapable of analyzing these texts in any exegetical detail.
Dave :: "In around AD 150, those who saw the original gifts in operation condemned the Montanists (today's Pentecostal equivalents) for heresy. Partly for claiming they had the same gifts today's Pentecostals claim."
Pathetically, you just refuse to read: it has repeatedly been point out to you that orthodox Church Fathers like Irenaeus and Tertullian continued to celebate the ongoing legitimacy of the gift of tongues.--but you can't hear what your cultic dogma rejects! And what 's your evidence that the Montanists spoke in tongues? I want a quotation here, which you can't produce because your spiritual quest is dishonest and second-hand. btw, 150 AD is a far too early date (try 170 AD) , but then, you have no clue on how to do historical research.
You keep pontificating this nonsense, but never consider the fact that no academic commentary on Acts and 1 Corinthians supports your cultic interpretation of 1 Corinthians 1:8 and 13:8-12. And you are incapable of analyzing these texts in any exegetical detail.
Dave :: "In around AD 150, those who saw the original gifts in operation condemned the Montanists (today's Pentecostal equivalents) for heresy. Partly for claiming they had the same gifts today's Pentecostals claim."
Pathetically, you just refuse to read: it has repeatedly been point out to you that orthodox Church Fathers like Irenaeus and Tertullian continued to celebate the ongoing legitimacy of the gift of tongues.--but you can't hear what your cultic dogma rejects! And what 's your evidence that the Montanists spoke in tongues? I want a quotation here, which you can't produce because your spiritual quest is dishonest and second-hand. btw, 150 AD is a far too early date (try 170 AD) , but then, you have no clue on how to do historical research.