Why don't you quote 51:6 where it is clear that the Psalmist, David is making just that point.
I don't see it making that point.
That answer is woefully inadequate. You made the accusation--now back it up.
NO. Because if I tell you what the heresy is, the Lord will hold me accountable for spreading that heresy further. So you can either take my word for it or else call me a liar...but I am not going to subject myself to whatever punishment might ensue if someone were to be permanently stumbled by the information that I might present to them. Because some, in their staunch defense of the NASB, have even gone to the extent of accepting the damnable heresy in question (even denying the Lord that bought them); saying that the heresy in question is supported by what is written in the original Hebrew of the verses in question. It is not; but the assertion almost caused me to lose my faith in Christ. If not for the fact that I have the gift of tongues and utilized it in the spiritual battle that ensued, I do not know that I would have survived spiritually. And if the heresy in question almost caused me to lose my faith, I do not want to be held accountable for someone else losing their faith because I told them the heresy and they accepted it as truth over the fact that they did not want to depart from the NASB as a version. I would rather you continue with the NASB (and hope that you never come across the heresy in question) than have you be stumbled by the heresy in question. However, I give the information that I do give as a warning...that if anyone continus in the NIV or the NASB, they will not be set free by the truth....but rather they will eventually stumble across a lie that might even cause them to lose their faith in Christ.
Doesn't it strike you as a bit pompous to quote yourself?
Judge ye not, lest ye be judged.
I know it was genuine because I was directed to read Scripture and I read it ALL--NIV, NASB, KJV and NLT. It finally made sense to me in ALL versions.
It is fine and dandy to read the scriptures in all versions...for you can get a better understanding of the kjv if you read what other versions have to say about certain verses...but I do not recommend holding the NASB or NIV as authoritative/inerrant as I hold the kjv to be authoritative/inerrant.
When you insist that only the KJV has the truth, you are denying others of that for which William Tyndale was martyred--reading the truth in their own language.
The kjv is written in English. If your language is English therefore, you do not need to go to watered-down translations in order to get the message in English.
All you have to do is care enough to look into the history of the KJV to find out it has been the most error ridden Bible ever printed.
What version do you therefore recommend? Is there a version that we can trust to give us the unadulterated message of the whole counsel of God? If the kjv is error-ridden, as you say, then we cannot trust it to give us the true message of the gospel. Any error found therein, might alter the message to the point that the reader would go off course that 1 degree and end up in the Pacific Ocean on his trip to Hawaii.
If the kjv is not inerrant, then it cannot be trusted to give us the message in such a way as to bring us safely home to heaven. So what version, other than the kjv, do you suggest
is inerrant?
I also see the bible as the final authority the only problem is that, many Christians who filter everything through scripture, seem to have their (me too!) own interpretation...
2Pe 1:20, Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pe 1:21, For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
2Co 3:12, Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech: