Grailhunter
Well-Known Member
The atheist once proudly said, "I found it! The Bible says, "there is no God."
To which the believer replied, "you have taken that out of context. It says, "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.""
And if the person does not want to serve the Lord, he will take the wrong message from that scripture passage and run with it...
Wealth is in italics. It could just as well be translated well-being. There is no word for it in the original Greek.
Excuse me, every last one of us was conceived in sin (Psalms 51:5). All have sinned and come short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23, 1 John 1:10); babies are not exempt from these scriptures. They declare the word "mine!" very early on.
It does not confirm that at all. What it confirms is that Jacob and Esau didn't commit any sins while they were in their mother's womb.
I would share what the heresy is with all of you...except for the fact that it stumbled me in my faith for a very long time, and I do not wish the same experience on any of you. Call it a cop-out if you wish...you can take my word for it or call me a liar until you stumble on the same heresy in your own reading of the NASB (it is also in the NIV and who knows what other version; but not in the kjv).
Now where did I ever say that Elizabethan English is the only way to salvation? I am saying that other translations are watered-down and lack the potency of the fullness of the saving gospel of Jesus Christ. That it is written in Elizabethan English is a side-point that has no relevance to the issue. Truth is, the kjv is the only version that has the form of sound words that we are commanded to hold fast to in 2 Timothy 1:13. It is the only translation that preserves every jot and tittle that Jesus said will never pass away from the true word of God (Matthew 5:18)
copied from my Facebook page: The fact that there is a controversy (concerning kjv-only) means we should examine the validity of the claims of both sides. On the kjv-only side, there is Matthew 7:13-14 and Matthew 5:18. Jot and tittle have been taken away in other versions; and they are also based on different manuscript sources. You have to really seek the Holy Spirit's answer on which ones are right (see Jeremiah 29:13). Personally, I feel that other versions are watered-down and that people go to them because they have itching ears (2 Timothy 4:1-5). Not everyone; some started with the NIV or NASB thinking they were valid translations. In my own life I began with the kjv and someone suggested that I "try another version". I did, and my walk with Christ then proceeded to go downhill until I returned to the kjv. Just a testimony (see Revelation 12:10-11).
But suppose that I have the whole truth, even being right 100% of the time? How would you know that unless you were also right 100% of the time and also knew it? If you don't have the whole truth and are not right 100% of the time, then you would be in disagreement at least some of the time with anyone who has it 100% of the time.
Now of course I am being somewhat facetious. I have posted elsewhere that I believe that I can be wrong at any time and that I need to keep a humble and flexible attitude so that if anyone can prove me wrong, I would be willing to change my pov. However, I also posted in the same breath that we ought to read the Bible in such a way as to find the truth; and that when we find it, we need to hold it as truth unless someone can show us biblically that we are wrong.
If you could just put away your "he" pride for a minute, these ladies might be able to get through that thick noggin of yours and you might just learn something.