BreadOfLife
Well-Known Member
- Jan 2, 2017
- 21,660
- 3,593
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Says virtually EVERY reputable Biblical scholar - Catholic AND Protestant."The Apostles are the Apostles and are not considered to be the "Early Church Fathers."
> Says who? THe RCC? How convienent, because they only want to see Peter, and therefore will fabricate it to be so, just so as to establish the progression to the first pope.
So now you are speaking contrary to how the apostles spoke and wrote to the early churches, calling them "little children"?
Men speaking to men, in that manner, does not reveal brotherhood in Christ, but rather fatherhood, who is God speaking through the apostles to the early churches.
I know of those who came after the apostles, so don't count me as ignorant, just because I don't refer to them and their writings.
As for your religious outline of when the early churches and ECFs were, you have skipped alot of detail, only to acknowledge one thing, and that is what the RCC wants to recognize, for the sake of man's ordination of the succession of Popes after Peter.
What God says about the early churches through the apostles, is His inspired words. Anything written by the "Apostolic Fathers" of your description, is not inspired, even though you might want to think that it is.
Your asinine position that it was "okay" for the Apostles to call themselves "Father" to their congregations - but NOBODY else could do that - is the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard on the subject.