How do you know?Well then that outright should throw macro evolution out the door. There is not a shred of evidence that leads to that conclusion.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How do you know?Well then that outright should throw macro evolution out the door. There is not a shred of evidence that leads to that conclusion.
Because if there was evidence it would be reported on a massive scale.How do you know?
Ok, you are clearly dishonest. You might as well not even respond I am putting you on ignore.I've seen no evidence of that.
Have you ever looked to see if there's any such evidence?Because if there was evidence it would be reported on a massive scale.
Huh? You said scientists were just as guilty as ICR at working under an anti-scientific rule. I asked you to show where that was the case. You posted no examples or cases. So as it stands, you haven't shown any evidence of scientists working under an anti-scientific rule.Ok, you are clearly dishonest. You might as well not even respond I am putting you on ignore.
In order for things such as radio metric dating to be accurate pre flood. It must assume things were exactly as they are today before the floodPlease elaborate on this assertion.
It is not according to science that the earth is billions of years, the dates are all over the place.if a day is indeed a 24hours then your faith might lost if you start to believe science
but isn't science the explanation of the bible...
how old is earth? according to science billions of years
and isn't God immortal he is the one who live forever and ever and a day for him is a mere 24hours? then why it was written that the end is nigh? how is near is near for God?
probably not too near for a human a human can only live for tens of years a lot of sinners preaches before they died saying "the end is nigh" they've died yet the end is still not ending
therefore a day for God is probably not a mere 24hours but billions of years and a near for God is probably thousands of years this is just an opinion nothing more
I've seen people start to question their faith because their religious leaders tell them it's either the Bible or science.if a day is indeed a 24hours then your faith might lost if you start to believe science
Not really, no. Science is the process of collecting data, doing tests, and drawing conclusions from that. Whether those conclusions agree with the Bible isn't relevant to science.but isn't science the explanation of the bible...
That's not true at all. Science has agreed on an earth that's 4 billion years old for a very long time.It is not according to science that the earth is billions of years, the dates are all over the place.
I get that you assert this. My question is why do you. Do the geologists and other scientists make this claim that "things were exactly as they are today" in the past?In order for things such as radio metric dating to be accurate pre flood. It must assume things were exactly as they are today before the flood
Well then that outright should throw macro evolution out the door. There is not a shred of evidence that leads to that conclusion.
How familiar are you with how evolution and genetics go together?What about them?
When they claim that radiocarbon dating is accurate up to 50000 years. Yes they do. Even if they do not outright say it. It’s the base of their argumentI get that you assert this. My question is why do you. Do the geologists and other scientists make this claim that "things were exactly as they are today" in the past?
Actually they don't. When it comes to C-14 there is some variability, so they account for that by calibrating against other methods and known dates.When they claim that radiocarbon dating is accurate up to 50000 years. Yes they do. Even if they do not outright say it. It’s the base of their argument
Just get to the point.How familiar are you with how evolution and genetics go together?
You can post it 100 times I have studied thisActually they don't. When it comes to C-14 there is some variability, so they account for that by calibrating against other methods and known dates.
I'll post this again (an explanation of radiometric dating from a Christian scientist): Radiometric Dating
I understand why you can't agree. I was just trying to help so you wouldn't say things that aren't accurate.You can post it 100 times I have studied this
I can not agree with what you are saying
When they claim that radiocarbon dating is accurate up to 50000 years. Yes they do. Even if they do not outright say it. It’s the base of their argument