SONS OF GOD, WHO ARE THEY?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

n2thelight

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2006
4,056
787
113
60
Atlanta,Ga
The genealogy of Cain is written for a reason,it's an almost exact copy of Seth's to whom Christ would be born..

That's the whole purpose of why he(satan)did that which was trying to keep Christ from being born.When that failed we zoom to Gen 6 ,when he(satan)sent his angels into the daughters of man.The daughters wasn't just from any man,but the daughters of ,THE man Adam,again them to whom Christ would be born
 

Preacher4Truth

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2019
2,252
2,861
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That's serpent seed doctrine that states Satan had intercourse with Eve, then Adam also had intercourse with Eve, Cain was Satan's offspring, Abel was Adam's offspring. It's a vile doctrine that has no place in any christian's belief system. :(
Careful now my friend, using biblical discernment and exposing error has been rendered "judging and evil pride" on this site. "Someone" is trying to set a new precedent here, an agenda that will not tolerate truth, sound doctrine or biblical correction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SovereignGrace

n2thelight

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2006
4,056
787
113
60
Atlanta,Ga
I'm sure we all know that, at least we should by now. I already brought this up in one of my earlier posts. Jesus is the ONLY reason why any human can be called a son of God. Before Jesus, the only human that was ever called a Son of God was Adam, because he was fashioned by God himself. This henceforth only leaves us with the angels being referred to in Gen 6, who were also fashioned by God, so why this is even a matter of contention is beyond me.

Where were we before birth?
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
8,508
587
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Careful now my friend, using biblical discernment and exposing error has been rendered "judging and evil pride" on this site. "Someone" is trying to set a new precedent here, an agenda that will not tolerate truth, sound doctrine or biblical correction.
I think that agenda was set by Satan a long time ago. Any new precedent would be Truth from God's Word.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
8,508
587
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The genealogy of Cain is written for a reason,it's an almost exact copy of Seth's to whom Christ would be born..

That's the whole purpose of why he(satan)did that which was trying to keep Christ from being born.When that failed we zoom to Gen 6 ,when he(satan)sent his angels into the daughters of man.The daughters wasn't just from any man,but the daughters of ,THE man Adam,again them to whom Christ would be born
Angels are incapable of producing offspring. Only the Sons of God created on the 6th day, Genesis 1:27 can multiply and have offspring. People give too much credit to Satan. All he did was convince Eve to eat the fruit. His job now is convincing God that any or all humans are just failures created by God.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 101G

101G

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2012
12,259
3,385
113
Mobile, Al.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Angels are incapable of producing offspring. Only the Sons of God created on the 6th day, Genesis 1:27 can multiply and have offspring. People give too much credit to Satan. All he did was convince Eve to eat the fruit. His job now is convincing God that any or all humans are just failures created by God.
100% correct.

PICJAG.
 

JunChosen

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2020
1,896
423
83
Los Angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Perhaps the word "bickering" is too harsh a word to use, but I'm coming from a Christian perspective.

I believe the Gospel can be seen in almost every page of the Bible and if we can't see it, it doesn't mean it is not there. It simply means God has not opened our spiritual eyes.

In Genesis Chapter 6 the phrase "sons of God" are the believers, as I've already alluded to and the phrase "daughters of men" are the unbelievers.

I believe God here is teaching that believers are not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers.
 

Ezra

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2018
2,564
1,314
113
62
Missouri
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
no angel has ever had sexual relationship with man kind. as in days of naoh is reference to the intermarrying /perversions between the descendants of cain evil seth Godly
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
8,508
587
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It can also show that the church is so corrupt, the Sons of God failed. It took an unbeliever, to trust God, and save his family from God’s Wrath.

It is time to set aside the doctrine of men and look only to Christ. The author and finisher of our faith.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
8,508
587
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
no angel has ever had sexual relationship with man kind. as in days of naoh is reference to the intermarrying /perversions between the descendants of cain evil seth Godly
At Noah's time all were ungodly, because of fallen Adam and his descendants.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
8,508
587
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
yes it all stemmed from cain and seth they intermarried
Seth was the sinner, but marriage is another matter. It took 800 years before the Sons of God were interested in Seth's fallen line of humanity.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
8,508
587
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Except for Seth. He was a godly man.
Is that a doctrine of man, or the Word of God? Genesis 4:26
"And to the same Seth also there was born a son, and he called his name Enosh. Then began men to call upon the name of the Lord."

Seth was 105 when he found God. Genesis 5:6.
"And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enosh."

Seth was not a son of God, but the son, of fallen Adam. Adam died spiritually, and no longer had contact with God. It was not until Enos was born, that Seth realized there was a God.
 

Rocky Wiley

Active Member
Aug 28, 2012
929
156
43
83
Southeast USA
To the OP only.

It is so sad to see confessing Christians bicker among themselves when they themselves lack knowledge in the things of God (Hosea 4:6).

I have not seen anyone here try to define the term "Sons of God." Perhaps if I started with a verse or two the meaning might come to light.

12) But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13) Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. John Chapter 1

The sons of God are all born again Christians as also defined by Jesus in John 3:3.

To God Be The Glory
There weren't any Christian's in the Old Testament, Age of Law. So, if Christians are the sons of God in the new testament, then it only makes sense that God's Chosen the first being Adam, and then Adams sons were also the sons of God.
s
 

Ezra

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2018
2,564
1,314
113
62
Missouri
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Seth was the sinner, but marriage is another matter. It took 800 years before the Sons of God were interested in Seth's fallen line of humanity.
seth was of the Godly line
 

Joseph77

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2020
5,673
1,325
113
Tulsa, OK
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
To the OP only.

It is so sad to see confessing Christians bicker among themselves when they themselves lack knowledge in the things of God (Hosea 4:6).
......
Yes, a lot of testimony or witness of the bickering and arguing have said they left the forums (this and others) after only 30 minutes because of it.
Some more left after a few weeks, seeing that it is permitted, it is wrong, and it does not change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JunChosen