BARNEY BRIGHT
Well-Known Member
Doesn't mean that he wasn't.
It was dogmatically decided at the Council of Nicaea in 325AD
Yes you go beyond what is written even though the scriptures tell us not to.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Doesn't mean that he wasn't.
It was dogmatically decided at the Council of Nicaea in 325AD
Yes indeed . sing to the glorious king . And there is only one mediator between GOD and men , the man Christ JESUS .Acts 4:8-12-- Then Peter was filled with the Holy Spirit and said to them, “Rulers of the people and elders: If we are being examined today about a good deed done to a disabled man — by what means he was healed — let it be known to all of you and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene — whom you crucified and whom God raised from the dead — by Him this man is standing here before you healthy. This Jesus is the stone rejected by you builders, which has become the cornerstone. There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to people, and we must be saved by it.”
Doesn't mean that he wasn't.
It was dogmatically decided at the Council of Nicaea in 325AD
My friend you took the line i was gonna bring . HAD mary remained a virginI do not think the Bible is mute
it states Jesus had brothers. (Not cousins)
and it said joseph did not KNOW his wife until after the birth of Jesus.
Inspite of the claims contrary, this sentence is meaningless if he “never” knew his wife.
How can it be any clearer?? NO OTHER NAME BUT JESUS CHRIST!But Jesus was in Mary! The ark of the new covenant!
"second person of the Trinity" is not explicit in Scripture. It was a theological DEVELOPMENT made necessary due to the attacks of heretics. We can start with the heresiarch ARIUS, whose teachings are embraced by the JW's. Whether you admit it or not, you are an Arian.Nowhere did the Holy Spirit inspire men to write down that the Only Begotten Son of God was the second person of the Trinity.
RULE VIOLATION:for broad is the way that leads unto destruction .
When i research pope francis , did you all know i actually go to the catholic sites themselves .
To see what the man actually said .
What i say next , even some catholics agree with me on this one .
that is the most dangerous and deceptive pope that has ever sat the throne , at least in my lifetime .
If you ever want to see his twenty sixteen prayer request , i got it . Right off the catholic website
with Their own translations .
So when i said Broad is the way that leadeth unto destruction . That man has made the road so broad
its almost unbeleiveable . WELL has i not seen it with my own eyes . That man is creating a one world
all inclusive social religoin . And about the only ones not welcome , are those who prolosyetize JESUS .
But i will bring his speeches on that stuff too . If any likes .
yall . we better cling to JESUS and that BIBLE and do so to the final breath .
Cause the delusion of the all inclusion that sprang from ecumincalism , its sucking up even many protestant leaders .
This wee thing is , by grace , going out as i came in , JESUS ONLY and one BOOK , the BIBLE . You all be blessed now . AND
be on gaurd .
For the record - not every person whom has disagreements with Creedal statements should be considered a nuisance, or in my opinion be segregated like on ChristianForums (*shudder*)."second person of the Trinity" is not explicit in Scripture. It was a theological DEVELOPMENT made necessary due to the attacks of heretics. We can start with the heresiarch ARIUS, whose teachings are embraced by the JW's. Whether you admit it or not, you are an Arian.
Nowhere did the Holy Spirit inspire 5 unqualified men to write down a twisted version of the New Testament.
Trinity deniers should be restricted to a single forum. The JW's, the SDA's, the Christadelphians, and legions of others can argue with each other and derail their own threads.
The basics of the Trinity is accepted by non-Catholic Christians, Protestant Christians, Orthodox Christians, and Catholic Christians. Trinity deniers prove to be a constant nuisance on every forum on the Internet.
"second person of the Trinity" is not explicit in Scripture. It was a theological DEVELOPMENT made necessary due to the attacks of heretics. We can start with the heresiarch ARIUS, whose teachings are embraced by the JW's. Whether you admit it or not, you are an Arian.
Nowhere did the Holy Spirit inspire 5 unqualified men to write down a twisted version of the New Testament.
Trinity deniers should be restricted to a single forum. The JW's, the SDA's, the Christadelphians, and legions of others can argue with each other and derail their own threads.
The basics of the Trinity is accepted by non-Catholic Christians, Protestant Christians, Orthodox Christians, and Catholic Christians. Trinity deniers prove to be a constant nuisance on every forum on the Internet.
Without councils, there would be no scriptures in the first place.It was decided in scripture, we do not need some counsel to decide what is true
Oh give me a break! You care more about Sam Rutherford's opinions than you do about 2000 years of consistent teaching. So the WTS wrote up their own distorted bible to justify them. No legitimate council ever deviated from the essence what Jesus said. That is just asserted, never proven.I've read about that. The problem with all that is the council completely ignored what God's Holy Spirit inspired men to write down what Jesus himself said about his relationship with God. I care more about what Jesus said about his relationship with his Father who is God.
"second person of the Trinity" is not explicit in Scripture. It was a theological DEVELOPMENT made necessary due to the attacks of heretics. We can start with the heresiarch ARIUS, whose teachings are embraced by the JW's. Whether you admit it or not, you are an Arian.
Nowhere did the Holy Spirit inspire 5 unqualified men to write down a twisted version of the New Testament.
Trinity deniers should be restricted to a single forum. The JW's, the SDA's, the Christadelphians, and legions of others can argue with each other and derail their own threads.
The basics of the Trinity is accepted by non-Catholic Christians, Protestant Christians, Orthodox Christians, and Catholic Christians. Trinity deniers prove to be a constant nuisance on every forum on the Internet.
So god is incapable?Without councils, there would be no scriptures in the first place.
Mary was never taught she a mediator the same as Jesus. That is a lie propagated by angry, ignorant anti-Catholic bigots. "Jesus-onlyism" was a sect that deviated from the Pentecostal movement in the 1950's. "Christ alone" is one of the 5 shibboleths that the reformers borrowed wholesale from the Catholic Church. It was not a "rediscovery". Since you know so little about your own religion, what qualifies you to be so critical of Catholicism (with lies)???Yes indeed . sing to the glorious king . And there is only one mediator between GOD and men , the man Christ JESUS .
If mary was a mediator , paul , peter and all others never said so . THEY SAID JESUS ONLY .
Your denials make discussion with you IMPOSSIBLE. Sorry, the Bible did not fall from the sky!So god is incapable?
scripture was around long before any council did anything
BARNEY BRIGHT will be ignored for his condescending harassments and using CB as a soap box for preaching the Arian heresy.That's interesting, Jesus tells his true followers to speak to everyone. After all he sacrificed his human life for all mankind and like his father who is God doesn't wish anyone to be destroyed. We JW will witness to anyone. Sorry you don't love like Jesus does who wants us to witness to everyone.
Constantly parading threads praising a mortal, focusing almost exclusively on that, putting almost all of your energy into that, and trying to convince others to do the same. Do you do the same for Christ Himself? No.
You personally do not venerate her (as I know many Catholics do), but flat out worship. Yes, it is a violation of the First Great Commandment.
Proper Catholicism is not the cult of Mary worship, but rather about Christ. @theefaith, re-focus back on Him.