Mutual Submission?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
“submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.” (Ephesians 5:21–33, ESV)
Ephesians 5-6 addresses issues related to roles in the home and society. The question I would like the address in this post is this: "Do these verses teach mutual submission?" This is a common misunderstanding of the verse, in my opinion. Generally, the argument is that verse 21 sets the tone for the rest of the section in the description of Christians "submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ." Thus, it is argued that the following examples, such as the husband and wife, are describing mutual submission and not the headship of the husband and submission of the wife. In my view, this teaching is not correct.

Verse 21 does set the stage for the rest of the teaching on these roles. However, it is important to understand that the term "one another" or, αλλελιος does not always imply a reciprocal action. For instance, in Revelation 6:4 we see this same word in reference to people "killing one another." However, this does not mean that everyone being killed is, in turn, killing the one killing them. No, there are some who are killing and some who are dying. The same would be true with the command to "forgive one another." Situations dictate when someone is to forgive and when someone is the one being forgiven. It seems clear that this command to submit to "one another" is qualified by the following examples of how such submission looks. There are different situations that determine when one is in a role as the authority and when they are in the role of one who submits.

The next question that is raised is whether or not the husband's love of his wife is another form of submission. The simple answer is no. First, the Greek word for submission in these verses is hupotasso. Hupo means "under" and tasso means "to place" or "organize." The word was generally a military term that referred to military rank and subordination to an authority. Never, in all of Greek literature is the term hupotasso understood as a mutual submission. It always means one is under another in a one direction relationship of submission. Second, love is NOT the same as submission. Paul uses Christ and the church as his example of love and submission. Christ loves us, but his love for us does not put us in a place of authority over him. A person can use their authority and power for the benefit of another. That act does not relieve them of their authority or power. Christ's submission on the cross was an act of submission to the Father's will, not to us. Jesus never gave up his lordship or divine nature in his submission to the Father's will.

In sum, husbands are portrayed as those of higher rank and authority in the home. This does not mean they are of greater value. It simply means that they have a role in the home and that role includes authority. Wives are called to submit to that authority willingly (the verb is in the subjunctive tense) in reverence to Christ. Husbands are not called to submit, but to love their wives, willing to give up even their own lives for them. It is a beautiful picture of submission and care. Authority among Christians is not the same as authority in the world. Christians are not to lord their authority over others, but to use their authority for the benefit of others. This is what we see in this text. Nevertheless, the Bible does teach the loving headship of the husband and submission of wives in the Christian home.
 

HammerStone

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Feb 12, 2006
5,113
279
83
36
South Carolina
prayerforums.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well, we've had some PM banter on this, but I think me jumping into this discussion might be profitable. I'll broach this issue from the "other side" even though in our discussion, I think we both agreed that one needs to be careful as to how they define submission.

I try and retain the traditional meaning of submission, which more or less, places the concept of putting oneself second to some form of either authority or object of affection. That said, specific submission should be defined by the context of where the term is used. I do think there has been an unhealthy focus on this passage from the male perspective, because it's often employed in a manner that says to the wife or woman, "see, you should do what I tell you!" This bludgeon verse nitpick misses the boat.

I focus in on what is said to the man, because the instructions are pretty darn strong. In fact, the man is commanded to be like Jesus. Now, we are a nondenominational forum, so there are some wide perspectives on exactly what that entails, but one thing we all agree on is there was one perfect man in history and his name is Jesus. That's an incredibly high standard once we ponder the work of the cross, the submission to God Almighty, and the devotion to which he loved that which God placed in his charge. To me, that should humble any man to the point of realization that God is entrusting another soul (and more souls with children) to his care. I'm not sure many of us could ever look upon our murderers and ask for God to forgive them.

At issue here is what's addressed about Jesus in Philippians 2:7. Jesus had the authority to call legions of angels to him, but he did not employ it. He declared his intent to be about his Father's business from a young age, and we see the bride of Christ served even through the ridicule of the Pharisees and the rejection that he would experience ultimately by his own chosen, closest companions. In this level of submission, it's calling for the man to be a servant of his wife, but it's not as simple as following a honey-do list as some would make it.

Rather, the great mystery of the church is paralleled in that the two become one, twain flesh become a single flesh. This is first and foremost established in submission to the Father. From there, it is the heart of a servant, not so intent upon "happy wife, happy life!" but rather hearts set upon pleasing Christ and performing the role that God ordained. What bothers me about complementarianism, is that the gnats start to get strained at in terms of doing this or that. What bothers me about the egalitarians is that it often becomes an issue of praxis and experience, where there is a very clear responsibility for the husband to "sanctify" the wife, as Christ sanctifies the church.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I agree completely that the concepts of headship and submission are very misunderstood and often abused. These roles are for the instruction of those who are in those roles, and not to lord that command over the other (i.e. "see, you have to do what I say!"). As a husband, God will hold me accountable for his expectations of me in my role. If my wife is not submissive, that does not mean I am still not obligated to love her as Christ loves the church. No, that is my role and what God expects of me. The same is true for the wife. She is to be submissive even if her husband is a jerk (unless he is calling her to violate an expressed command from God). For instance, we read:

“Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives,” (1 Peter 3:1, ESV)

It seems clear to me that Paul is teaching that a sacrificial husband and a submissive wife means by which we display Christ to the world. Unfortunately, many Christians have been so influenced by culture that they have joined the crowd in lobbying for their own agenda and rights, rather than seeking to give up their own lives and follow the Word with their whole heart. I mean, clearly, Paul was opposed to slavery. Yet he commands slaves to be obedient to their masters (and many of those masters were likely not Christians). He didn't call for equality or social uprising. It is amazing to me how far and radical this teaching on submission is. We have been infused so long with the fight for personal "rights" and "freedom" that we have lost sight of the call of Christ to die and the power of God to act on behalf of those who humble themselves before Him. Of course, please do not read in this that I am arguing that people should put themselves in a position to be happily oppressed or mistreated. I don't think that is the point. However, I do think the ways of the Kingdom are completely the opposite of the ways of the world. Too many Christians still strive to apply worldly principles to a heavenly kingdom. Its no wonder our marriages are crumbling and our witness has faded.