Search results

Christ became subordinate to God, but did he stay in subordination?

This story of Adam and Eve is about Christ. Under the veil it can’t be seen. Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. — Genesis 5:2 If you pay attention you see the curses placed on the two observed by Cain and Able...

Okay, so in the spiritual realm beyond the veil you reach maturity and literally become a perfect man, to the fullness of the stature of Christ. Paul is referring to this as unity in faith. Paul also states that the woman is saved in childbearing. In my mind the only way this can be reconciled...

Is that a yes or a no?

I understand what your stating here. In my mind Apostle Paul makes it pretty clear there is neither male or female in the body of Christ, but outside of Christ in the carnal mind, people role play. In this carnal reality we live under the female forever remains the subordinate to the male.

I have a question, does this verse apply to the females also or is it only for the males in the church? Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: — Ephesians 4:13

What Old Testament reference is Paul using to make this statement in Hebrews? But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. — Hebrews 1:8 Post #501

These trinity guys are always trying to say "see here's proof" off of a verse. I can only assume I’m one of these guys? Could you direct me to where I’ve proclaimed this, and also explain to me what else I believe?

This is the question I’d asked @Wrangler in an earlier post, which he never responded to. Where did I make a positional statement as to the topic is Jesus God. It was simply a question. The reason I had asked Peter if he’d considered joining your group is because at times he also appears to...

Well, thanks for not admonishing me this time. Maybe your not fit to be a JW, after all.

It was a simple question.. I wasn’t making a statement! Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre. Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. — Psalm 45:6-7...

What Old Testament reference is Paul using to make this statement in Hebrews? But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. — Hebrews 1:8

I believe I understand now, what I posted didn’t come directly from you men teachers, and I understand that is important too you! Try and understand that it means nothing too me.

Which part did I lie about, that Eliezer of Damascus was the first servant in father Abraham’s house or that the Hebrew word for Lazarus is Eliezer? Or was it that the rich man was arrayed in fine linen? Did it bother you that I said that Jesus was rich toward God?

Maybe since Eliezer/ Lazarus of Damascus was the first servant in father Abraham’s house, the story is about Jesus’s spiritual state? I also note that Jesus was also arrayed in purple and fine linen - rich toward God.

According to my understanding the bosom of God would be a place of eternal rest. The bosom of Abraham according to Jewish understanding I would guess would be a place awaiting the rest of God.

It’s almost laughable, Lazarus was also in the bosom of Father Abraham. I guess by his theological stance Lazarus would also be God?

Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. — Luke 24:39

It could simply be stating the creation that begins in the first century. With the birth of Jesus, Gods firstborn Son.

God was also manifest in Paul’s flesh. I’ve often considered this, seeing God has no beginning nor end.