Search results

ATP, this is a perfect example of how OSAS corrupts Scripture in order to establish itself. You see clearly that the text says "If WE.." but you somehow conclude "If WE" should be read "If OTHERS...". No, ATP, you cannot change Scripture in order to make it fit your ideas. It plainly says "WE"...

ATP, there is no more sacrifice for sin if "we" (the saved) sin willfully after receiving a knowledge of the truth." Get it? The writer of to the Hebrew Christians who are washed in the blood, born again, redeemed folk tells them there is no more sacrifice for sin if they chart a course to sin...

I didn't ask you about some "future" wars. I asked you to whom was Paul referring when he said "Israel of God".

Paul says Christ's bride is the church, does he not? A "chaste virgin". Jesus says he's going away to prepare a place for us and will come again and receive, which all scholars agree is marriage language modeled after the method of Christ's day.

It seems that God wasn't just waxing eloquent when He said we would find Him only if we searched with ALL our hearts. Historicism is a school of eschatological thought that was around during the time of Wycliffe and Huss, but certain aspects of it can be traced to the ECF, such as their belief...

ATP, when Paul referred to the "Israel of God" in Galatians 6:16 KJV, was he referring to those who "are Christ's" and are are "Abraham's seed" (Galatians 3:29 KJV), -or- was he referring to a nation of Christ-haters that spit venom on the Cross, mock Jesus as "the Great Imposter" and "son of...

If we are OSAS, then why did Jesus give us the parable of the Unmerciful Servant who after receiving the forgiveness that he asked for was once again condemned to pay the debt of his sin?

When will you realize that no one is reading these humongous walls that you post, man? I've told you time and time again, but you refuse to listen. You are as thick as a brick!

ATP, James plainly says the saints are not only capable of sin, but will be judged by the law, and there is no other way to interpret his words. Therefore, the foundation for OSAS - the belief that sinful behavior of saints is not considered sinful in the sight of God - is no foundation at all.

The God of the OT was none other than Christ. How can you make such a dichotomy between the God of the OT and the NT when they are one in the same? And I see no relationship with this reply to my post in which I expose OSAS as illegitimately passing judgment upon any saved person who decides to...

Verse 63 is where Jesus reveals the meaning of His "hard saying". "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: THE WORDS that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life." John 6:63 KJV His Word must be in us, the "bread of life" and His redemption "through His...

God will save the Jew "which is one inwardly, who circumcision is of the heart", not the Jews who's only outwardly circumcised. Remember, all the promises made to the fathers such as what you speak of apply to those who are in Christ Jesus, bro (2 Corinthians 1:20 KJV)

Notwithstanding the propaganda, I know people, even non-Christians who turn to Al Jazeera and the BBC to find out what's going on around the world, such as the uprisings in Venezuela taking place right now. As one who accepts the Historicist view of a Papal Antichrist, which leads to the...

"But thanks be to God Which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." 1 Corinthians 15:57 KJV

Who was James speaking to when he said "if thou commit no adultery, yet thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law"? He clearly says "my brethren" the saints! (James 1:2 KJV) Since John says that everyone who is born of God does not sin, but James also says those born of God can...

You OSAS people are so backwards in your theology. You know full well that we are not to judge the hearts of any man, yet you confidently judge the man as having "never been saved", despite Jesus' express command that we do no such thing, for the very reason that we are incapable of looking upon...

Which is it, "yes" or "no"? If he lives out the rest of his days raping women, is he going to end up in heaven or hell? I think it's a fair question to ask OSAS, don't you think?

It's interesting that the only organization to interpret the command of Jesus to "eat My flesh and drink My blood" is the Catholic church, which punished with death millions who refused to believe that the wine and host underwent a "transubstantiation" at the Latin words of the priest, "This is...

ATP, when someone asks me if the decision of a saved person who rejects Jesus and returns permanently to serve sin results in the loss of eternal life through rejection of it, I say most definitely. Now, I ask OSAS this "yes" or "no" question: When a man becomes a born again, washed in the...

OSAS is essentially salvation on man's terms rather than God's terms. OSAS says, "I will be saved by grace through dead faith which either does or does not produce obedience because it matters not" while God says "I will save you by grace through living faith which allows My Son to be seated on...