Search results

I agree with Paul. You criticize me for doing so. Terrific. Thanks for showing your spots.

Yes, and my point was that Paul, by his own words, would disagree with prism's criticism and misunderstanding.

If never said I did not need the word of God. The point is...God Himself has finished revealing His word in tablet form and has moved on to the revelation of all truth by the Spirit...and we should welcome the transition to that same great glory which can only be known of God in spirit.

Nancy, I have been playing for a few years now. Always wanted to play guitar when I was younger but never spent the time. So now, I don't consider myself a musician but I do have a little fun with it. I grew up with my father singing in the vineyard...so I guess the uke is just an excuse to sing.

The Holy Spirit may not be "adding new revelation about Himself" on tablets. But your comment does not even leave room for "now we see through a glass dimly, but then face to face." Why do you assume such a limit?

A savory flame-grilled beef burger topped with juicy tomatoes, fresh lettuce, creamy mayonnaise, ketchup, crunchy pickles, and sliced white onions on a soft sesame seed bun? "Wake up with the King!"

That's a bunch of hooey. I quoted you, so there is no question about your mocking. You may not know what I am talking about (duh!), but it is you who started this topic with criticism against "mature spiritual Christians." So your "off the topic" comment is just you evading what you have...

You mock me, but I gave an historical foreshadowing example and precedence that happened in the natural with the natural vine that is now repeating in the spiritual by many who are graphed in. Except in this case, those graphed in are not under the full promise as Israel was, which grace does...

Look...if you can't track with history or follow an actual example by comparison...well you will just have to relive it. But you may want to take notes so you can remind yourself of just how you were on the wrong side of God advancing His salvation plans.

Hahaha...famous last words! Had to quote them. The confuser is confused.

Revelation 12:11 "And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, and they did not love their lives to the death."

Hahaha...apparently you do not know the scriptures. Go figure. Genesis 11

Except you are against the full promise of God, and this group you call names, not only revere Him by what is written, but also worship Him in spirit and in truth according to the same word. This day was foretold, and like Israel and the law, you run the risk of becoming an enemy of the complete...

This is a re-run of Israel holding onto the law and justifying their action by killing Christ. And my argument and clarification is the same: Just as the law is not done away with, but fulfilled, so too the scriptures are not actually done away with, but fulfilled...but fulfilled in spirit...

And you think it is better that you came against "a group" you call "mature spiritual Christians", rather than just one individual?

There is nothing wrong with that...for a while that is. But when one is fully grown he should put away childish things. And when we know in full by the perfection of God, that which we once only knew in part...is done away with. 1 Corinthians 13:10 All of which is according to the word and...

This is exactly why God confounded His word so that it must be discerned spiritually, for even the demons quoted it to do evil.

Still, your time is short. And while you carry on, all the more are born into the kingdom. But it is He who left the door open, not you.

It was I who had to point out to you that YOU were the one who have "personally" attacked "those" mature spiritual Christians, slandering them with accusations of "belittling the scriptures." You could have said "it" is this or that, but you did not, you said "those", meaning persons. So, to...

It is the form of how and where the word of God is written that changes. When that time comes when it is in on one's heart, nothing is lost, but gained. But you have not explained why you would be critical of such a change.