Search results

It is amazing how frequently trinitarians refer to this figurative prologue that does not even mention Jesus while ignoring Jesus explicitly saying his Father is the true God @ John 17:3.

Irrelevant to the point, which is there is one God, who alone is LORD and this is the most important commandment. Some Jews. It does not change the fact that Jews wrote the OT & NT and Jesus fulfills the Jewish prophecies for Messiah. That is, there is not another religion that Jesus fulfills...

My post contained more than the word ‘weak.’ Not sure what evidence you are looking for. My post went on to analyze why the claim is weak. There is a battle song that includes ‘from the shores of Tripoli,’ which implies the US Marines fought at Tripoli. In fact, I read a book a few years ago...

I have it right. All men are created, begotten. Some are adopted. We and Jesus were both begotten (created) and adopted.

I will when. Have more time to review. Are these the lengthy posts you made? One response is Elohim means heavenly beings and is not a term limited to a trio.

You got it totally backwards. The evidence against Jesus being God is overwhelming. This text is explicit. Trinitarians desperately attempt to assert explicit texts like John 17:22 and John 20:17 ought to be superceded by vague or figurative texts, like John 1:1, where they can suppose their...

Absolutely not! One, as in one being. We know this because Jews, who wrote the entire Bible, reject the trinity to this day.

I’m not sure what could be more relevant than the word of God contains no explicit teaching of the trinity. It’s absence is so profound, trinitarians cannot accept this basic fact of Scripture.

Worse, they do no see holding onto the life raft as necessary action once Jesus throws the life raft to us, drowning in our own sins. Worst of all, they deny Jesus waits to throw the life raft to us pending our action to put faith in his saving us.

This point has been made to OSAS dozens of times.

Something granted in the past due to something done in the future. Some kind of time travel there.

Just a human invention untied to Scripture.

There it is again; that odd ex post facto invocation of not knowing a true Christian until ... wait for it .... action is observed.

Obviously, we disagree with that. Other verses clearly state Jesus said to baptize in his name. Trinitarian dualists do not recognize this contradicts the verse that references 3 on the contradictory idea that they are one. Why do all the prologues of all the epistles reference only the...

I don’t think you know that ONE cannot reference “they.” More violations of Logic Definition Language Usage.

Appeal to Ignorance. Implied premise is that it only makes sense to Baptize in the name of a God. Many US holidays are named after men who are not Holy.

Exactly! Trinitarians abuse of logic extends to NOT EQUAL to mean its antonym.

I have. Tonight I can share the link with you. I put it in a thread about why the Apostles were disobedient.

While there are nuance differences with monotheism, they are theologies that reject dualism stand in opposition to trinitarianism. I am a unitarian Christian. This means I hold there are 2 beings, not 3, involved in our salvation: God, who alone is the Father and his adopted son Jesus. God is...

Sounds like effort to me. work out your salvation with fear and trembling Philippians 2:12