Search results

Quoting scripture should be unnecessary. They should know their bibles well enough or understand Christianity well enough to know it doesn't contradict. I'm not here to teach fundamentals. Those need to be done by your own personal church leaders. The reason it would be useless to post...

Eh, sounds like shrinking it or enlarging it will include someone's bias really easy. Their bias may be the correct interpretation, but eh.... Let's not call it a bible if it's too far removed from exactly how the books are designed now.

If you wish to believe that newer translations are worse than the KJV, you are free to your beliefs, regardless of how ignorant they may be. I leave you with that.

@S4C I do not need to do anything you say. I could cite scripture, but it would be useless. So I refuse your demands. Truth is, and I can say something true without quoting the bible. If you want to know where my references are, look it up yourself. I am not going to read the bible for you, do...

Black Cauldron was awful. Honestly though, I think South Park has some of the best political and social criticisms. They take the arguments of society and politicians and push them to their logical extremes, and it makes everything absolutely crazy. And they're not afraid to poke at Muslims...

The bible totally supports this. Jesus even calls himself God on multiple occasions. The Jews then attempt to stone him to death because he spoke blasphemy. False teaching isn't death-worthy. Blasphemy is punishable by stoning. When Jesus made his I AM statements, they attempted to kill him...

@S4C If that's what you want to believe, I guess that's your choice.

Karma. It sounds just, but that's not how it all works. The first traveler is still a murder. Only the government and God have the authority to justly take someone's life. The first man is not God, nor the government. Therefore, evil was repaid with evil. This is not the way of our God.

I do not have to provide anything to know your interpretation is poor. I'm not prejudice. "Prejudice" is about a pre-formed opinion against something. I used to believe young earth. I do not believe it any longer. It is an incorrect belief. That is not how Genesis 1-3 should be interpreted. It...

@S4C I'm hurting no one. Progressive taxes is not a harm, it is justice. I do honor God. Thank you for the reminder though. And requiring scripture is not sinful. Spreading lies that I have contempt for God and his Word is sinful. Not providing scripture is not sinful. What I have been saying...

No. No. No.

@Vale Stop with the insults. Why do you feel it is ok to insult? Why do you do this? It is completely unnecessary and sinful. I have asked you to stop. You continue. Is your goal to get a rise out of me? Are you simply attempting to make me angry? That too would be sinful. Reply to me again...

@Vale I support a lot of Theology of the Body, but I object to contraception being immoral. Regardless, it is very educational and anyone that likes to read should buy it. Btw, Fides et Ratio is my favorite encyclical.

Before the Fall, our job was to "tend to the garden". This would include the beasts of the field. It will be our job after Resurrection too.

I didn't even know there were people that thought KJVO until I got here. What a silly notion.

I do not presume that your stance in the matter is based on a lack of googling. You asked for evidence. The evidence can be accessed via google. That's all I said. That's all I meant. I think your stance on the matter is based on a poor interpretation of scripture, and you'll ignore anything...

And to make really specific, "co-substancial" means "same-substance", or in non-philosophical terms, "same-being".

Oh, translations aren't good enough? KJV is a translation. Should we only use the original Greek? Even the Latin was only made in 382 AD... When I read the Latin translation, it should say the same thing the KJV does, right? It doesn't. Here's the problem: the KJV was translated from corrupted...

That's exactly what I'm doing, but thank you for the reminder. @Trekson You keep calling the book "Revelations". That's not even it's name. It isn't plural. I doubt the expertise of anyone I find that doesn't know the name of the book. And I believe we are off topic. I've given you my piece...

What do you propose instead?