Search results

John 1:1c and John’s use of grammar Let’s look at some Bible translations that differ from the majority of trinitarian translations. Some use the term “divine.” (1) Trinitarian Moffatt’s popular New Translation of the Bible and (2) trinitarian Smith-Goodspeed’s An American Translation...

CLEAR CHALLENGES TO THE TRINITY DOCTRINE (A) (A) Please carefully and thoroughly search to find a vision, dream, or clear description in scripture wherein God is shown as more than one person. (This is really not that difficult. Either there is a vision, dream, description, etc. somewhere in...

JBF wrote in another thread here: "If Jesus said that He is the Son of God, then He is claiming to be the mighty God; ... and the everlasting Father (...Isaiah 9:6)." Is. 9:6 is usually translated in trinitarian-translated Bibles as: “For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us...

The following seven posts are an example of why I like to discuss with a person without disruptive comments from others. Most readers will refuse to even completely read just one lesson, and they will start right in with off-subject matter or their own hypothetical treatment of John 1:1c...

Scott has asked me to start off with my first scripture we will discuss. I believe the Most High God of the Bible is a single 'person' (YHWH, the Father alone.) I am also asking that when using a quote from the OT, please use a Bible which uses one of the accepted transliterations of God's...

We have agreed to examine a verse until we are both ready to go to another. We'll use the Bible of our Choice, but will use a good NT text to back it up. If two scriptures are necessary to complete a single idea (John 8:58/Ex. 3:14?) it will be allowed. Aspen may start if he wishes.

The problem with Phil. 2:6, 7 (part 3) Many trinitarians insist that this scripture proves that Jesus was (and is) “equal with God.” But all the real evidence proves just the opposite! Phil. 2:6 is, in reality, proof that Jesus has never been equally God with the Father! To begin with...

Harpagmos (Part 1) Now notice how these two trinitarian Bibles have rendered another part of Phil. 2:6: 1. “He did not think to snatch at [harpagmos, ἁρπαγμὸς] equality with God” - NEB. 2. “He did not think that by force [harpagmos] he should try to become equal with God” - TEV (and...

Morphe - part one Although it has been rejected by even many trinitarian Bible scholars, some others (including some on this forum, e.g., "The problem with the trinity") attempt to force an interpretation of morphe (μορφῇ) that includes the idea of “essence” or “nature.” They do this only at...