26 major reasons to reject the Premil doctrine

[Spiritual Israelite]

So true. If you were a Premil, would you not? I know I would.

If I was a Premil and saw the arguments that you and I are making, I would become an Amil. I know that is true because that is exactly what happened in 2006 when I saw Amils like you, Shirley and @DavidTaylor making irrefutable arguments in favor of Amil on the old Bible Forums site.

 

[WPM]

If I was a Premil and saw the arguments that you and I are making, I would become an Amil. I know that is true because that is exactly what happened in 2006 when I saw Amils like you, Shirley and @DavidTaylor making irrefutable arguments in favor of Amil on the old Bible Forums site.

Those who are open, have eyes to see, and are zealous to submit to the explicit repeated teaching of that Word of God, should embrace Amil.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Those who are open, have eyes to see, and are zealous to submit to the explicit repeated teaching of that Word of God, should embrace Amil.

Agree. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be many people like that on this forum. At least, not any of the active posters. Hopefully, some lurkers are learning something.

 

[WPM]

Agree. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be many people like that on this forum. At least, not any of the active posters. Hopefully, some lurkers are learning something.

I agree. The calibre of Premils here are incapable of addressing the numerous holes in their doctrine.

 

[WPM]

Also Brethren in Christ...

Don't pay attention to any Amillennialist that tries to claim that all Premill believers are on man's FALSE Pre-trib Rapture theory. If Amillennialists are confused about the origins of the false Pre-trib Rapture theory and attribute that false idea to Premill, then it shows they don't understand what The Bible teaches about at all.

The 1st century Church fathers believed in a Premill idea, which is the actual order of the written Bible Scripture. It means on the day of Christ's future return AFTER the tribulation, at that point Christ's LITERAL "thousand years" reign with His elect begins. Premill means understanding that "thousand years" as a LITERAL period, not an allegory like Origen and occultists try to claim.

Since the 1st century Church fathers held to a Premil belief, then how could they believe in a false Pre-trib Rapture theory, simply because the Pre-trib Rapture theory was first preached in a Christian Church in 1830's Great Britain by John Nelson Darby?!?

I didn't know John Darby was around in the 1st century A.D. to preach that false Pre-trib Rapture Theory to the 1st century Church fathers; did you know that?? Yet that is exactly the STUPID idea that Amillennialist try to use against Premils, because they well know the 1st century Church fathers were all Premillennialists!

1. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described sin existing on a future millennial earth?
2. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described corruption existing on a future millennial earth?
3. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described the wicked existing on a future millennial earth?
4. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described mortals existing on a future millennial earth?
5. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described decay existing on a future millennial earth?
6. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described the curse existing on a future millennial earth?
7. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described Satan existing on a future earth?
8. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described an alleged future millennium which involved the elevation of natural Israel above all other ethnic groups as Premil does?
9. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described an alleged future millennium involving a renewal of the Jewish sacrifice system as Premil does?
10. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described an alleged future millennium involving carnal pleasure like procreating in the age to come as Premil does?
11. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that advocated the binding of Satan for 1,000 years+ after the second coming as Premil does?
12. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that advocated the release of Satan 1,000 years+ after the second coming as Premil does?
13. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that advocated the revival of Satanism 1,000 years+ after the second coming as the wicked in their billions overrun the Premil millennium as Premil does?
14. Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that taught that Christ would be reigning in earthly Jerusalem over His enemies for 1,000 years upon David’s throne as Premil does?