Marcus O'Reillius said:
Right back atcha -
War. 7. 1. 1
(1) Now, as soon as the army had no more people to slay or to plunder, because there remained none to be objects of their fury (for they would not have spared any, had there remained any other such work to be done) Caesar gave orders that they should now demolish the entire city and temple, but should leave as many of the towers standing as were of the greatest eminency; that is, Phasaelus, and Hippicus, and Mariamne, and so much of the wall as enclosed the city on the west side.
He wanted to capture it, sure, but in the end: TITUS DESTROYED THE CITY AND THE SANCTUARY.
That is a fact.
And Titus and his ROMAN troops fulfilled the near-term prophecy in Daniel 9.
So what part of reading comprehension can you not grasp?
Oh yeah, that part that completely obliterates your false contention and contrivances.
Youre the dimwit who cant get over the fact the order was given after the burning of the temple which was originally destroyed by his Arab troops who were a majority made up of auxiliary and volunteers, who were not Roman citizens...
But please carry on with your distitute belief.
There is specific instruction in Colossians 2:16-17 which prohibits a direct correlation between new moon festivals along with other facets of Jewish ritual and custom TO the end-times.
That is your own misguided forced conjecture into the verse..it prohibits no such thing....I asked you what does HOLY CONVOCATION mean? Last time I checked God never did away with his HOLY CONVOCATION?
But your the expert, do tell me export what does CONVOCATION mean? What does a shadow mean?
So your whole switch to "hebrew idioms" is basically a red herring - and no credible commentary or eschatology leans on them as the basic structure with which to build their theory on the end-times.
But of course you would say that prewrath is destitute in any hebrew thought. I can also through the battle of jericho at you and I can also through Rev 10:7
But in the days when the seventh angel is about to sound his trumpet, the mystery of God will be accomplished, just as he announced to his servants the prophets."
But then again this is over your head as prewrath has no cooking clue what mystery of God is accomplished at the 7th trumpet.
Also the very fact I have an actual literal resurrection and rapture occuring at the 7th trumpet. which I can boast of...your eschatology prewrath doesn't....as I stated I feel sorry for you prewraths everything must just be coincidences for you guys
A fallacy in argument: Argumentum ad nauseam(argument to the point of disgust; i.e., by repetition): This is the fallacy of trying to prove something by saying it again and again. But no matter how many times you repeat something, it will not become any more or less true than it was in the first place. Of course, it is not a fallacy to state the truth again and again; what is fallacious is to expect the repetition alone to substitute for real arguments.
Hardly a fallacy when I have two scripture witnesses.
Talking of two scripture witnesses I have asked you a number of times now, where does scripture have the antichrist associated with the covenant???
This is a NEW Covenant.
There is NO basis for saying Jesus "confirmed" an OT Covenant.
The word “new” covenant here is made with “two”distinct groups. The House of Yisra’el & the House of Yahuwdah! The Hebrew word “new” is the word“chadash” which means “to renew, rebuild and repair.” what part of that did you not understand? Was it the word Chadash?, was its meaning renew or repair that threw you off?
AND the ONLY time Jesus MADE this New Covenant - was at the END of His little less than three-year Ministry - not at the beginning!
Well actually the renewed covenant staryed the very minute Christ uttered these words.
Luke: 4:18
The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free,
And here
The time is fulfilled, and the Kingdom of God is at hand
Pray tell what time was fulfilled?
Clearly, the 70th week had now come, for the 69th week had only brought us “unto the Messiah.”
But then again
Oh'really's vanity would even argue with Christ on this matter.
If this measure of time be broken off at the end of the 69th week, then the great events with which the prophecy is concerned -- namely the “cutting off” of the Messiah (thus finishing the transgression, making an end of sin, making reconciliation for iniquity, etc.) -- would be left OUTSIDE THE SEVENTY WEEKS ALTOGETHER!!
You can say, that the anti-Christ forces through by the might of the fourth terrible beast's power - a peace treaty with many, ostensibly with Israel, because Jerusalem, its Capitol, is one of the foci for Gabriel's explanation of God's Plan to Daniel.
This is fanciful, if anyone actually read there bibles would quickly discover the antichrist is completely incapable of any peace treaty...
No good scholar would render a Hebrew word's meaning strictly on the basis of its forming root word's letters' figurative meaning!
This is where you keep showing yourself up as absolutely out of your depth....where do you think they got the military idea for the word Gabar?
Equally ridiculous. atin-christ cannot quote me where I said gabar doesn't have three letters.
I never said it.
Then you shouldnt have issues with the following
Gimmel = Foot or burden-bearer, to gather, carry away.
Beyt = the House of Yisra’el.
Resh = the head of a man, first, beginning, chief ruler.
Well doesnt that sound just like Christ.
Do you not understand the first law of mention concerning the covenant in Daniel 9:27? Please start over and go back to genesis where God is making a covenant with Abraham....alot of similarities. Pay attention.
Please spare the readers your logic....now i believe I have asked a number of times, that scripture demands two or more witnesses that the Antichrist is associated with the covenant....one can not build a doctrine on one verse.