Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
no need for endless long articles and sermons as Jn 3:5 is clear enough as water and spirit and not water alone or spirit alone and necessary as passport to them kingdom - any comments - twinc
And is it only the RCC rules that apply, or does baptism by any 'johnny come lately' church count?
And is it only the RCC rules that apply, or does baptism by any 'johnny come lately' church count?
There are many who claim that when the Lord said "born of water and of the Spirit" He was speaking about Christian baptism.no need for endless long articles and sermons as Jn 3:5 is clear enough as water and spirit and not water alone or spirit alone and necessary as passport to enter the kingdom - any comments - twinc
There are many who claim that when the Lord said "born of water and of the Spirit" He was speaking about Christian baptism.
But when we study the New Testament, we discover that water is also a metaphor for the Word of God, and in this case the Gospel (which is the power of God unto salvation). So this "water" is the Gospel, since sinners are regenerated BEFORE they are baptized.
23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away:
25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you. (1 Peter 1)
If you accept the fact that "water" means the Gospel, then yes. However, if you think water means the water of baptism, then no.water precedes spirit or more exactly they must be together - twinc
There are many who claim that when the Lord said "born of water and of the Spirit" He was speaking about Christian baptism.
But when we study the New Testament, we discover that water is also a metaphor for the Word of God, and in this case the Gospel (which is the power of God unto salvation). So this "water" is the Gospel, since sinners are regenerated BEFORE they are baptized.
23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away:
25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you. (1 Peter 1)
If you accept the fact that "water" means the Gospel, then yes. However, if you think water means the water of baptism, then no.
Why are you disagreeing with Peter, who wrote by divine inspiration (Q).Well, I disagree, being this is the Day of Pentecost...
If you accept the fact that "water" means the Gospel, then yes. However, if you think water means the water of baptism, then no.
Why are you disagreeing with Peter, who wrote by divine inspiration (Q).
He preached the Gospel on the Day of Pentecost, and it became the seed of the New Birth for about 3,000 Jews. It is only after they "gladly received" the Word of God that they were born again by the power of the Holy Spirit, who was given to them as a gift. So it is the combined effect of the Gospel and the Holy Spirit which produces the New Birth. Not water baptism.
And Peter was not suggesting that the water of baptism washes away sins, or produces the New Birth, or results in the giving of the Holy Spirit. What he was teaching is that those who received the gift of the Holy Spirit must be baptized immediately. And so they were. But the fact that the gift of the Holy Spirit is given BEFORE water baptism is clear from Acts 10.No, you did not Quote Peter completely, REPENT and BE BAPTIZED in the NAME.
And Peter was not suggesting that the water of baptism washes away sins, or produces the New Birth, or results in the giving of the Holy Spirit. What he was teaching is that those who received the gift of the Holy Spirit must be baptized immediately. And so they were. But the fact that the gift of the Holy Spirit is given BEFORE water baptism is clear from Acts 10.
And this is the point that is is being established. First the gift of the Holy Spirit (who regenerates the believing sinner and produces the New Birth) then water baptism."Can anyone Forbid water, that these should be Baptized who have received the Holy Spirit.
And this is the point that is is being established. First the gift of the Holy Spirit (who regenerates the believing sinner and produces the New Birth) then water baptism.
It seams to me that your training has been by taking scripture out of context, Peter states repent and be baptized, and receive the gift of the Holy Spirit, for the promise is to you and to your children, and to all that are afar off, ect,ect,ect. So because the Gentiles received the spirit before they were baptized, Now it has Changed, New Formula.
I suppose the vision Peter had was all about food, Right!!
Acts 8:35-39 -35- Then Phillip opened His mouth, and beginning at this scripture, preached Jesus to Him. [the Eunuch]
36- Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the Eunuch said, See [here is] Water. What hinders me from being baptized?
37- Then Phillip said, If you believe with all your Heart, you may' And the Eunuch answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God. { Confession}
38- So he commanded the Chariot to stand still. And both Phillip and the Eunuch went down into the Water, and He [Phillip] baptized Him [ the Eunuch]
39- Now when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught Phillip away, so that the Eunuch saw Him [Phillip]no more; and the Eunuch went on his way rejoicing.
Where is the Formula, no mention of the receiving of the Spirit, before and or after????
The Bible says this: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. (Rom 10:9,10).Where is the Formula, no mention of the receiving of the Spirit, before and or after????
so why did the Eunuch need to be baptized and not the thief on the cross - btw it seems it is not at all easy, for adults to believe or repent as it is for children - twinc
The Bible says this: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. (Rom 10:9,10).
So when the eunuch made his confession of faith, he was saved. He also said: "I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God". And that is when he was born again: But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (John 1:12,13)
Since to be "born again" is also to be "born of the Spirit", he received the gift of the Holy Spirit at that very moment: Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life. (Tit 3:5-7)
So I trust you see how everything ties together, and since this man received the gift of the Holy Ghost, he was baptized immediately.