Well I noticed, LoL.
If you want me to list them as you say, here are the early sources I quoted, in the following order: A prophecy by Rick Joyner, a prophecy by Selveraj, a video by Jack Chapple, and an article by economist Nouriel Roubini. I will post them again here:
Now, your response to this was as follows:
You are still echoing that last statement, which means your position hasn't changed (Btw, what's with all the dots? LoL).
But my response is this. Since I quoted the above sources to confirm and strengthen the position I presented in the OP, because Selveraj, Joyner, Chapple, Roubini, and Rackards all agree with what I am saying, if I lay behind the words and not God, are you not passing the same judgment upon them?
I will be posting on this thread through next year likely, because I will be following the issue. But if I post additional quotes from prophets who agree (or agreed) with the message, would you not be passing the same judgment on them, insinuating that they are likewise "false prophets"? If I post additional articles or videos from economists who foresee the same things that I do coming, will you not be passing judgment on them, that they are just greed-hungry, and trying to take advantage of people? They all stand in agreement with one another.
Oh I see you are not referring to me passing judgement on other members of the forum.
Oh sorry about the dots, it’s how I write sometimes. I know what it means, but forget that I am writing to others, bad habit !!
I stand by my comments about the economist- sorry just don’t like that kind of selling and promotion. He may very well have been agreeing with your view about the economy, but that wasn’t really what the video was doing, and as I said I wasn’t the only one who had a problem with it.
And the video about the white rider, I stand by what I said about that as well.
I wasn’t actually passing judgement on the OP, it was your evaluation that it was correct, as opposed to other prophecies that say the opposite. If you remember rightly ,I also had an issue with the fact that you only posted part of the prophecy, you cannot weigh anything up without having the full version - and I do think it is messing about with what is conveyed.
Now , it could be that you merely wanted a discussion about part of the prophecy, but I took it that you wanted to proclaim a message - hence why I questioned certain things. I did go on and read the whole thing and later we had a discussion about parts of it.
Judgement is a funny thing, we evaluate and make comments about many things in the forum- even when we agree with someone we are passing judgement. We are judging whether we agree or disagree.
I cannot say what conclusions I will reach about further posts.
Both you and I are free to post and free to add comments , and as a member here I exercise my rights to challenge if something bothers me. The only thing I would say is that sometimes flat text conveys one thing to the reader that is not actually the intention of the writer.
Prophecy, to me, needs to be shared, adding to it in order to prove its right bothers me a little - Gods words, if truly from him, should be able to stand alone. The person conveying the message is responsible for speaking or writing the words, that’s all.
If you have felt judged by my words, then I apologise. I do admit that I didn’t come across in a helpful way the other day. There were reasons for that, but I think I will leave the reasons why with the Lord.
Rita