But, other than that...good luck!
Yeah, China is on my radar too.
At some point, post-human history, we'll all come back into formation.
Best wishes.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
But, other than that...good luck!
Convergence of Signs tells us the Return of Jesus is very Near and the Rapture is Imminent!!
Signs and Imminent can't go together,in other words if the rapture can happen at any time,what signs are needed?
What about the Mark of the Beast? What about the 7 Last Plagues of Revelation? What about the "Time of Jacob's Trouble"? All these must come to pass BEFORE Jesus comes in the clouds and calls out to the dead and living saints to meet Him in the air.The Convergence of Signs tells us the Return of Jesus is very Near and the Rapture is Imminent!! What kind of life would you live if you really believed the rapture is imminent and that Jesus may return today?
I already have. It is just that you do not want to accept what I have already posted. Sorry, but you prove why I am wrong from scripture instead.
Shalom
I already have. It is just that you do not want to accept what I have already posted. Sorry, but you prove why I am wrong from scripture instead.
Shalom
My proof that the 'rapture to heaven' is a false teaching, is the Word's of Jesus:Interesting.
Especially when you spend all your time attacking the rapture but never offer any proof as to what you believe.
All bark and no bite.
="Keraz, post: 485591, member: 7877"]My proof that the 'rapture to heaven' is a false teaching, is the Word's of Jesus:
John 3:13 No one goes to heaven, except the One who came from there.
John 7:34 Where I go, you cannot come...
John 8:21-23 Your home is on earth......
John 17:15 I do not pray for You to take My followers out of the world, but keep them from the evil one.
Revelation 2:25-26 Hold fast to what you have until I Return.
To those who are Victorious, to those who persevere in doing My will until the end, I will give them authority over the nations. Revelation 5:9-10
Revelation 5:9-10 New International Version (NIV)
9 And they sang a new song, saying:
“You are worthy to take the scroll
and to open its seals,
because you were slain,
and with your blood you purchased for God
persons from every tribe and language and people and nation.
10 You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God,
and they will reigna]">[a] on the earth.”
Here I again with what? Pointing out scripture? But okay, sure...let's look at the actual passages, rather than having a "I say/you say that it says this" sort of thing:And here you go again.
I'm not exactly of your point here. The passage itself could have two meanings...either Christ is disapproving the use of literal swords "that is enough" (enough talk of that)...which could hold some merrit, since he rebukes Peter shortly for using a sword to protect him in the garden. Others say that Christ is not disapproving the idea of protecting oneself with a sword. Afterall, it seems the Disciples had been carrying at least two swords up until that point with Christ's approval. So...defensive purposes, but not to advance the gospel by force...that sort of thing.When Christ sent them out he told them do not have an extra pair shoes, don't worry about food, don't carry a sword etc.
But when his ministry on the earth ended he told them to have extra sandals and to buy a sword.
It strikes me that the real weight of our issue, or one of them, is that you believe that God must remove his people before he "tests" the world, correct? But...there seems, to me, to be a few problems with that. If God is going to 'test' the nations with earthquakes, famines, volcanic eruptions, water polution, etc...if that is what his 'wrath' is going to be...then...his "people" have been suffering from those things since the beginning of the world...or, at least, since its fall. What makes the "Tribulation" any different, apart from intensity? I'm sure the Christian who got swept away in a tsumani, or crushed to death in an earthquake may not appriciate your theological difference.The promise of the rapture was a one time deal. God said he does not test and try his people. So, when he was ready to test the earth, every last living person on it, to keep his promise he said he would remove us.
As far as you presenting answers, I have yet to see one that held water.
"Naomi25, post: 485614, member: 7237"]Here I again with what? Pointing out scripture? But okay, sure...let's look at the actual passages, rather than having a "I say/you say that it says this" sort of thing:
re'sHe the verse I was speaking of. Jesus telling his Disciples that when they went into the world they could expect hardship and persecution, but that death was not to be feared, since God would protect them...not a 'hair' would perish.
You will be delivered up even by parents and brothers and relatives and friends, and some of you they will put to death. You will be hated by all for my name's sake. But not a hair of your head will perish. By your endurance you will gain your lives. -Luke 21:16–19
I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. -John 10:28
Not only that, but we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, -Romans 5:3
and you will be hated by all for my name's sake. But the one who endures to the end will be saved. -Matthew 10:22
But the one who endures to the end will be saved. -Matthew 24:13
For you have need of endurance, so that when you have done the will of God you may receive what is promised. -Hebrews 10:36
We can see how much the bible emphasises both endurance and also suffering, and how both lead to our ultimate reward of being saved...
But from Luke 21 we can see that this 'rescue' we can anticipate, is not from death itself...as it comes from what is here on earth...but of the second death.
Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and for ten days you will have tribulation. Be faithful unto death, and I will give you the crown of life. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who conquers will not be hurt by the second death.’ -Revelation 2:10–11
Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! Over such the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for a thousand years. -Revelation 20:6
I'm not exactly of your point here. The passage itself could have two meanings...either Christ is disapproving the use of literal swords "that is enough" (enough talk of that)...which could hold some merrit, since he rebukes Peter shortly for using a sword to protect him in the garden. Others say that Christ is not disapproving the idea of protecting oneself with a sword. Afterall, it seems the Disciples had been carrying at least two swords up until that point with Christ's approval. So...defensive purposes, but not to advance the gospel by force...that sort of thing.
But...I can't see either debate weighing in here.
It strikes me that the real weight of our issue, or one of them, is that you believe that God must remove his people before he "tests" the world, correct? But...there seems, to me, to be a few problems with that. If God is going to 'test' the nations with earthquakes, famines, volcanic eruptions, water polution, etc...if that is what his 'wrath' is going to be...then...his "people" have been suffering from those things since the beginning of the world...or, at least, since its fall. What makes the "Tribulation" any different, apart from intensity? I'm sure the Christian who got swept away in a tsumani, or crushed to death in an earthquake may not appriciate your theological difference.
The second problem I have with it is this: everything I've read on "the Tribulation" suggests to me that those 'believers' who will be here at the time...Saints, you call them, they will experience most of their torment and death through the work of Satan and his followers, rather than the calamaties that fall on earth.
Which brings me to number 3 problem...the notion that God could not, if he chose to, have such calamaties "skip" Christians upon the earth if he so chose to. We've all seen the news footage, of how tornados take out a whole block, but skips a house and leaves it pristine. When you say that God "could not" do that...that he "has to" take people off the earth...even though there is no scripture that says that...just because that is what fits into your notion of "escaping the wrath to come" means, then you fall into a category of telling God what he can and can't do.
Add all those problems together and then weigh it up with the fact that there is no scripture that explicitly states what you need it to state, and your doctrine is not very airtight.
No signs are needed. But one can observe that which is taking place today compared to that which will be in place just prior to the Tribulation, and which will take place during the Tribulation, and can deduct from that, that it is possible that these end time events could now take place. And if the props are in place so that the Tribulation could take place, and the Rapture occurs first, then it makes the Rapture very close.
All is predicated on God. Does He want this to be the time or not. It could be, It could not be. Just because it does not occur, does not mean it could not have occurred as all was in place. I can assure you that satan is observing and preparing when the stage is so set. As he doesn't know when the time is either. He tries to be ready at all times to plug his man in and go with it.
Stranger
According to rapturist it, the rapture can happen at any time,so my question,why do ya'll need a sign,and if you do why ignore the ones from Mark 13 and Matthew 24?
Can't have it both ways,ie,pick and choose
Signs are not needed but God chose to use them.
According to rapturist it, the rapture can happen at any time,so my question,why do ya'll need a sign,and if you do why ignore the ones from Mark 13 and Matthew 24?
Can't have it both ways,ie,pick and choose
Reread post #(83).
Stranger
Exactly when did the Coming of Christ and the Resurrection / Catching-away BECOME imminent? There had to be a time when it was not imminent (before the Cross for example) and then there had to have come a moment when it was now imminent. Exactly when was that moment; when did the rapture BECOME imminent?