Yes, it's in the Vulgate.As I got older I longed for the version of the bible that was closest to the true so I began only using the KJV. Is "Rapture" used in another version?
I'm back to the KJV myself.
:)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, it's in the Vulgate.As I got older I longed for the version of the bible that was closest to the true so I began only using the KJV. Is "Rapture" used in another version?
Ah . . . before the heavenly throne, though standing on earth. OK, I understand.Where is Heaven?
It is a Spiritual concept, a place in another dimension, inhabited by Spiritual beings and therefore not perceived by us mortals.
However, if God wills it; heaven and Gods Throne can be seen by humans. Ezekiel 1:1 and Acts 7:56
All the Christians gathered into the holy Land will see it; Revelation 7:9, 2 Thess 1:10, Rev 14:1
Hi Enoch,Yes, Heaven is in another dimension but that DOES NOT make it "a spiritual concept". Furthermore, since the heavenly city New Jerusalem is presently in Heaven and is occupied by God and Christ, that establishes Heaven as a tangible place and an architectural wonder -- a city that has been literally designed and constructed by God!
Your problem is that you prefer earth to Heaven, whereas the majority of Christians prefer Heaven to earth any day. You do not even believe that Enoch and Elijah went to Heaven, and that all the OT saints are now in Heaven, along with all the NT saints who have passed on. Paul calls then "so great a cloud of witnesses" but you don't believe it.
Hi Keraz,Thanks for a well thought out reply. Of course; I reject it totally and I do so because you have failed to actually provide any scripture that says God will take His people to heaven. Your 3 scriptures, [minus verse numbers,] do not say Christian believers will be taken off the earth, at any time.
Another reason I reject a 'rapture to heaven for the Church', is the many prophesies that say how every faithful believer will gather and live in all of the holy Land, soon after that area is cleared and cleansed by the Sixth Seal devastation. Deuteronomy 32:34-43, Isaiah 66:15-21. Romans 9:24-26, +
They are seen there in Daniel 7:23 and Revelation 13:7, when the AC conquers them.
marks,Hi Enoch,
I think that when some people think "spiritual", it's in terms of "unsubstantial". But neglecting to consider that those who inhabit it find it just as much their home as we do here. And while it seems non-material to us here, is that the way we will experience the heavenly?
Obviously I don't know, but I don't think so.
Much love!
Hi Keraz,
I'm sorry you reject this response. I was not attempting to support "rapture to heaven", I was refuting your points.
1/ Such an idea is not found in the Bible.
It is found in 1 Thess., John 14, Rev 7, there are others if you really want to look at this.
Added . . . you assert, such an idea is not found, I assert it is, with a supporting Scripture. So this is not a valid argument, but could become one.
2/ Jesus refutes it five times; John 3:13, John 7:34, John 8:21-23, John 17:15, Revelation 5:10
None of these refute this teaching, these all say we can't get there on our own. You and I are in complete agreement on that.
Added to say . . . You support your assertion that no one will be taken into heaven with verses which say that no one can go there on their own, therefore, those verses do not actually support your argument, therefore, this is an invalid argument.
3/ Unprecedented, why should God remove His people today, when all up until today have been persecuted and martyred.
Well, the first time something happens is in fact, well, the first time. If it happens to be what God is doing, then it's just what God is doing. He said we wouldn't understand His ways. Although personally, to me this seems completely in character.
Because something has not happened before is not a valid argument against it happening in the future.
4/ The prophets have told us what will happen in the end times and how we must endure until the end.
Has God through His prophets told all people that they will have to live to the end of the great tribulation? No, many will die before that, and many have. Not being here because of death, or because of removal, no requirement that every believer be here till the end of that time. And good reason to think that there needs to be some sort of change which this removal would address.
Enduring to the end can only mean enduring to the end of what God has for each of us whatever it may be, and cannot mean that all Christians who have ever been must be on the earth at the end of the age. This also is an invalid argument.
5/ The ongoing dispute of pre, mid, post or anytime rapture, is evidence enough of there being no proper scripture about a 'rapture'.
That people don't agree over a position does not mean that position is wrong. Well, it depends on who you are and what other positions you hold. For instance I'm Trinitarian, but some are Modalist, some are Oneness, then there is "shared essence", something like that. Does that automatically make trinitarianism wrong?
Added . . . Disagreement over a position is not a valid argument against a position, after all, the opposing side disagrees with you.
6/ Jesus said that we Christians could be deceived. He was right!
But you can become undeceived in a moment by coming to believe the pre-trib rapture! OK, tongue in cheek, of course! But point made I hope.
Added . . . Again, this does not present a valid argment for or against the rapture.
7/ Peter said that Satan is prowling around looking who he can devour with his lies and Paul says that people will listen to 'nice' stories, turning away from sound teaching.
See reply to 6/.
Keraz,
I believe I've refuted each of the points made, do you disagree with my comments?
Much love!
Thank you for giving me a post I could "like" this morning! Sometimes this forum can be a real downer!marks,
From everything that we read about Heaven, and the fact that the Lord Jesus Christ is presently in Heaven in His resurrected glorified body, and that we too will receive such bodies, I believe Heaven is as *tangible* as earth, but in a purer and better way, since it is another dimension which is both spiritual and real (as real as anything on earth). The heavenly city New Jerusalem is also tangible but constructed out of heavenly precious stones and gold.
tangible
adjective
tan·gi·ble | \ ˈtan-jə-bəl \
Definition of tangible
(Entry 1 of 2)
1 a: capable of being perceived especially by the sense of touch :PALPABLE
b: substantially real : MATERIAL
2: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind
3: capable of being appraised at an actual or approximate value
Both Ezekiel 1:1 and Stephen; Acts 7:56, saw God's Throne from the earth. Understand?Ah . . . before the heavenly throne, though standing on earth. OK, I understand.
Much love!
Yes I do.I believe I've refuted each of the points made, do you disagree with my comments?
Both Ezekiel 1:1 and Stephen; Acts 7:56, saw God's Throne from the earth. Understand?
Yes I do.
You can think people can go to heaven as much as you like, but as I have already said, the best refutation of that idea, is the many prophesies that tell us how all the Lord's faithful people will live in all of the holy Land, which, Stan B, is all that area from the Nile to the Euphrates.
Any ideas or fanciful notions of living in heaven are just fables that Paul warns us to not be fooled by. 2 Timothy 4:3-4
And in both those passages the scene is described that way. So when I say, you saw a movie at the drive-in, just out in the field, in front of the screen, and then I say Jerry saw a move in the theatre, you would be mistaken to think of that as an open field in front of a screen. It's indoors, AC, cushy seats, all that. Different venues, with different descriptions.
Care to actually refute the points I've made? You gave a list of reasons for your view, I've refuted each on, to which you reply, Nope, you're wrong. In so many words.
Let's say that you are correct in your idea that we will all live in the Holy Land, how does the destination define the route?
I'm not saying we continue to live in the heavenly realm, we certainly return to this realm in the kingdom.
Much love!
Hi Stan and Welcome,Jesus left us with the promise "I go to prepare a place for you", it certainly was not Israel!! Who would want to live there, of all places, during the tribulation? And to suggest that God will move His throne to earth during the tribulation is totally beyond comprehension. He still has to deal with the war that will take place in Heaven during that time.
Hi Stan and Welcome,
As you can see we have a whole spectrum of TOTALLY BIZARRE ideas floating around here (and on all Christian forums). As you can see from the title of this thread, the OP has no clue about the Rapture and connects it to the Antichrist (and some call it the "Jesuit End Times Antichrist Deception"). Then others connect the Papacy to the Antichrist!
But even after one has presented the relevant Scriptures, there is total unbelief about this supernatural event called the Rapture (more precisely the Resurrection/Rapture). So posters drag out the names of Ribera, Irving, McDonald, Darby, Scofield, etc. and then make ad hominem attacks. And then promote the idea that no one goes to
Heaven, and that Enoch and Elijah probably went to Inner Mongolia (or somewhere else) rather than Heaven. Was there ever a time when weird and bizarre ideas were floated around as we see today?
I can see that you are a reasonable person, Marks. I often get very bitter and nasty responses to my refutation of a 'rapture'.Hi Keraz,
I'm sorry you reject this response. I was not attempting to support "rapture to heaven", I was refuting your points.
1/ Such an idea is not found in the Bible.
It is found in 1 Thess., John 14, Rev 7, there are others if you really want to look at this.
Added . . . you assert, such an idea is not found, I assert it is, with a supporting Scripture. So this is not a valid argument, but could become one.
2/ Jesus refutes it five times; John 3:13, John 7:34, John 8:21-23, John 17:15, Revelation 5:10
None of these refute this teaching, these all say we can't get there on our own. You and I are in complete agreement on that.
Added to say . . . You support your assertion that no one will be taken into heaven with verses which say that no one can go there on their own, therefore, those verses do not actually support your argument, therefore, this is an invalid argument.
3/ Unprecedented, why should God remove His people today, when all up until today have been persecuted and martyred.
Well, the first time something happens is in fact, well, the first time. If it happens to be what God is doing, then it's just what God is doing. He said we wouldn't understand His ways. Although personally, to me this seems completely in character.
Because something has not happened before is not a valid argument against it happening in the future.
4/ The prophets have told us what will happen in the end times and how we must endure until the end.
Has God through His prophets told all people that they will have to live to the end of the great tribulation? No, many will die before that, and many have. Not being here because of death, or because of removal, no requirement that every believer be here till the end of that time. And good reason to think that there needs to be some sort of change which this removal would address.
Enduring to the end can only mean enduring to the end of what God has for each of us whatever it may be, and cannot mean that all Christians who have ever been must be on the earth at the end of the age. This also is an invalid argument.
5/ The ongoing dispute of pre, mid, post or anytime rapture, is evidence enough of there being no proper scripture about a 'rapture'.
That people don't agree over a position does not mean that position is wrong. Well, it depends on who you are and what other positions you hold. For instance I'm Trinitarian, but some are Modalist, some are Oneness, then there is "shared essence", something like that. Does that automatically make trinitarianism wrong?
Added . . . Disagreement over a position is not a valid argument against a position, after all, the opposing side disagrees with you.
6/ Jesus said that we Christians could be deceived. He was right!
But you can become undeceived in a moment by coming to believe the pre-trib rapture! OK, tongue in cheek, of course! But point made I hope.
Added . . . Again, this does not present a valid argment for or against the rapture.
7/ Peter said that Satan is prowling around looking who he can devour with his lies and Paul says that people will listen to 'nice' stories, turning away from sound teaching.
See reply to 6/.
Keraz,
I believe I've refuted each of the points made, do you disagree with my comments?
Much love!
The place Jesus is preparing is obviously the New Jerusalem, which will come to the earth after the Millennium. Revelation 21:1-7Jesus left us with the promise "I go to prepare a place for you", it certainly was not Israel!! Who would want to live there, of all places, during the tribulation? And to suggest that God will move His throne to earth during the tribulation is totally beyond comprehension. He still has to deal with the war that will take place in Heaven during that time.
Hi Stan, And welcome to you!Jesus left us with the promise "I go to prepare a place for you", it certainly was not Israel!! Who would want to live there, of all places, during the tribulation? And to suggest that God will move His throne to earth during the tribulation is totally beyond comprehension. He still has to deal with the war that will take place in Heaven during that time.
I can see that you are a reasonable person, Marks. I often get very bitter and nasty responses to my refutation of a 'rapture'.
Point 1/ There is no verse that says God will take His people to live with Him in heaven. That idea must be assumed or guessed at from verses like: We are not appointed to His wrath...Rev 3:10
For starters, this applies to those who 'stand firm' and it absolutely does not say or hint of any removal to avoid His wrath. I have over 20 verses that tell how the Lord will PROTECT His own DURING His wrath.
2/ The five verses I provided say that people don't go to heaven; period. Of course going to heaven necessitates a change to a spiritual state. Rapture believers point to 1 Corinthians 15:50-56, saying that will happen.
However, that prophecy of Paul's, clearly says; then Death will be no more..... Which we know from Revelation 21:1-7 happens AFTER the Millennium.
3/ For God to suddenly remove His people from persecution and martyrdom, after nearly 2000 years of terrible tortures of the Christians, is quite illogical as well as impossible; as God does not change His mind. Malachi 3:6, Hebrews 13:8
4/ One of us is deceived and as believers in a rapture is the majority, you are probably comforted by that. But I see how all the prophets were disbelieved and vilified, so as I promote what they wrote, I expect and get; nothing less.
I realize that for most 'rapture' believers, it is very difficult to change. Their friends and families would think they had gone crazy!
5/ The dispute over when a supposed 'rapture' could happen, makes a joke out of the whole issue.
We are plainly told all the important aspects of Salvation and things like how Jesus will Return. Why not tell us about going to heaven? Our citizenship is recorded in heaven; in the Book of Life, which is not opened until the GWT Judgment, after the Millennium. Revelation 20:11-15
6-7/ Those who have chosen to believe false teachings, will be locked into them and it becomes very hard for them to change. Isaiah 29:9-12, Jeremiah 4:22, Isaiah 48:6-8, +
Isaiah 8:16 I shall bind up the message...so it cannot be known by My disciples.
And Jesus said: Father, You hide these things from the wise and educated and reveal them to the simple. Matthew 11:25
Sobering thoughts, worthy of very deep consideration.
Hi Keraz,
Thank you for your responses!
I'd use verses like in Thess. about being caught up to forever more be with Him. As I'm of the view that this is "pre-trib", it then makes sense that as Jesus will continue to be in heaven, we will be there with Him. When He returns to the earth, we return with Him. Where He is is where we are, so if Jesus is in heaven after the catching up, then we will be to.
And of course Rev. 7 shows believers in heaven. But we'd need to focus more on that passage, perhaps another post.
But I disagree, and I ask that you show those verses mean what you say they mean. When I look at them, I see them using verb syntax that states no one has gone on their own, but nothing that says no one can be taken into heaven. It's just not there.
Not illogical, the age ends sometime. And unless all people are killed in the great tribulation, and of course they won't be, Some people will be spared martyrdom.
Oh, and my mother. My mother was a Christian. I believe she was born again, and that she is with Jesus. My mother was not persecuted, not martyred, so many millions were, no one is spared! Why was she? And if it can be her, it can be you too. It's just whatever God wants.
Anyone who knows me knows I'm not about the numbers of who believes things. I've come to hold a number of views, that when I first came to them, I had Never heard them anywhere, knew no one who taught these, though now I do. But it's always and only about what God says.
That's people making the issue their disputings, and has no bearing on whether or not the Bible teaches a certain thing. You just need to make sure you understand the passages, for what they themselves say, I think that when we all do that perfectly, we will all believe the same things.
Yes, some things do seem to be very hidden from some people! We need to be open and receptive and humble.
Much love!
The 1 Thess.4 "caught up" event is about those of us still alive on earth, when Jesus 'descends' to the earth. There is nothing written there about a return back into Heaven.
Hello n2thelight,
Curious how you see him (the anti-christ) setting himself up 'in the temple' to be worshipped,
And especially with regards to 'putting an end to the daily sacrifice'...
I believe the Church is God's temple, and that it is referring to the outlawing of the Divine Liturgy and the sacrifice of the Eucharist... (If 'Christ' has returned, there is no more reason for this)
For the faithful, this command to cease offering the Eucharist and worship of the one who commands its cessation, will positively identify 'the man of sin'
Will he set up shop in Jerusalem? Of course, how else could he be heralded by Jew, muslim and 'christian' all as the messiah, Christ. Mahdi.....
Peace be with you!
Or about a return to earth, or coming in glory, or setting up His throne, or any of that. We need to broaden our search!
Much love!