Do you really know Jesus and our Father?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

tigger 2

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2017
916
405
63
84
port angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Answer to Enoch 111 concerning Heb. 1:8:


Heb. 1:8 (condensed from my larger study)




Heb. 1:8 in the King James Version (AV or KJV) is rendered:

“But unto the son he saith, thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.”

Since “he saith” and the second “is” (found after “righteousness”) in the above verse are not actually found in the original manuscripts and have been added by the KJV translators, they are found in italics in most printings of the KJV.


But more importantly (as a quick glance into any interlinear Greek-English New Testament will show) the first “is” (found after “God”) in the above verse is also not in the original manuscripts but has been added by some modern translators.

Yes, literally the NT Greek manuscripts read at Heb. 1:8: “Toward but the son the throne of you the god into the age of the age”.

The trinitarian Easy-to-read-Version also says in a footnote for Ps. 45:6 (which is being quoted in Heb. 1:8):

God .... here the writer might be using the word ‘God’ as a title for the king.” (Cf. NIV Study Bible f.n. for Pss. 45:6 and 82:1, 6.)

(And the revised 1991 ed. of the NAB actually translates Ps. 45:6, 7 as “Your throne, O god.”) The NAB (1970 ed., St. Joseph Edition) goes on to explain in its footnote for Ps. 45, 7 (6), however, that others have translated this verse as, “Your throne is the throne of God” and refers us to 1 Chron. 29:23 “where Solomon’s throne is referred to as the throne of the LORD [Jehovah].”


Now we’re getting close to the most likely intention of Heb. 1:8. There is evidence that the proper translation of Heb. 1:8 (as well as Ps. 45:6) should be “your throne is God forever” or “God is your throne forever.”

Also, if we look at some respected trinitarian authorities, we also see a preference for the “God is thy throne” rendering.

Oxford professor and famed trinitarian Bible translator, Dr. James Moffatt, was described as “probably the greatest biblical scholar of our day.” His Bible translation renders Heb. 1:8 as:

God is thy throne for ever and ever.”

University of Cambridge professor and noted New Testament language scholar, Dr. C. F. D. Moule reluctantly admits that Heb. 1:8 may conceivably be “construed so as to mean Thy throne is God- p. 32, An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek, Cambridge University Press, 1990 printing.

An American Translation (Smith-Goodspeed), renders it: “God is your throne....”

And The Bible in Living English (Byington) reads: “God is your throne....”

The Message reads: “Your throne is God’s throne….”

NSB - God is your throne


Mace - "God is thy throne….”



Twentieth Century Translation - ‘God is thy throne….’

Noted trinitarian NT scholar Dr. William Barclay, in his translation of the New Testament, has also rendered Hebrews 1:8 as : “God is your throne for ever and ever.” But worse yet (for those wanting evidence of a trinity in Hebrews), Dr. Barclay comments as follows:

“The letter [of Hebrews] was written to a Church which had had great days and great teachers and leaders.” - p. 6. “Moreover, it was obviously written to a scholarly group [who] ... had long been under instruction and were preparing themselves to become teachers of the Christian faith.” - p. 7.

And just what was this passage that includes Heb. 1:8 (Heb. 1:4-14) intended to prove to this group of long-term dedicated Christian scholars?

“[The author] is concerned to prove [Jesus’] SUPERIORITY OVER THE ANGELS.” - p. 16, The Letter to the Hebrews, Revised Edition, 1976, The Westminster Press.

Yes, this world-acclaimed trinitarian scholar has (perhaps inadvertently) illuminated the truth of the doctrine of God which was understood by first-century Christians! They had absolutely no concept of the 3-in-one God idea which was developed in later centuries. IF these learned first century Christians had really considered Jesus “equally God” (as fourth century Christendom began doing), it certainly would have been nonsensical for the writer of Hebrews to attempt to prove that Jesus was superior to all other angels!


Famed trinitarian (Southern Baptist) New Testament Greek scholar Dr. A. T. Robertson acknowledges that either “Thy throne, O God” orGod is thy throne” may be proper renderings: “Either makes good sense.” - p. 339. He also tells us that the inspired Letter to the Hebrews was written to a church of Jewish Christians whose Jewish neighbors

“... have urged them to give up Christ and Christianity and to come back to Judaism.... These Jews argued that the prophets were superior to Jesus, the law came by the ministry of angels, Moses was greater than Jesus, and Aaron than Jesus. [The writer of Hebrews] turns the argument on the Jews and boldly champions the Glory of Jesus as superior at every point to all that Judaism had, as God’s Son and man’s Saviour, the crown and glory of the Old Testament prophecy, the hope of mankind. It is the first great apologetic for Christianity and has never been surpassed.” - Word Pictures in the New Testament, Vol. v, pp. 331, 339.

Again, it would have been absolutely absurd for the inspired writer of Hebrews to devote this entire, long letter to proving that Jesus is superior to Moses and the angels if the intended readers, as the spirit-born Christians they were, had already accepted Jesus as God Almighty! And even if they had originally believed that Jesus was God, but were now in doubt, the Bible writer certainly wouldn’t waste any time trying to prove Jesus’ superiority to Moses (or the angels). He would have dedicated the entire letter to proving absolutely that Jesus is God (if he had really believed such a thing himself)!


The American Standard Version (ASV), the Revised Standard Version (RSV), the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), and The New English Bible (NEB) have provided honest alternate readings to the traditional trinitarian rendering of the KJV at Hebrews 1:8. These alternate readings (found in footnotes) agree with Dr. Moffatt’s, Dr. Barclay’s, Smith-Goodspeed’s, Byington’s, and the New World Translation’s renderings of this scripture (“God is your throne”).

Even Young’s Concise Bible Commentary (written by the noted trinitarian author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible) admits: “[Heb. 1:8] may be justly rendered ‘God is thy throne ....’”
 

tigger 2

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2017
916
405
63
84
port angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
part 2


Quoted From Ps. 45

In addition to these admissions by trinitarian translators concerning Heb. 1:8 itself, we need to look back at the Old Testament Hebrew scripture (Ps. 45:6) that Paul was quoting when he wrote Heb. 1:8.

The RSV renders it as “Your Divine throne” and a footnote provides these alternate

readings: “Or your throne is a throne of God, or Thy throne, O God.’”

The NEB says: “Your throne is like God’s throne.”

The Holy Scriptures (JPS version) says: “Thy throne given of God.”

The Bible in Living English (Byington) says: “God is your throne.”

The Message has: "Your throne is God's throne, ever and always.”

The Good News Bible (GNB), Bible, renders it: “The kingdom that God has given you will last
forever and ever.” - ABS, 1976.

New International Reader’s Version (NIRV): “Your throne is the very throne of God.”

The Good News Translation (GNT): “The kingdom that God has given you will last forever and ever.” – ABS, 1992.

The REB has: “God has enthroned you for all eternity.”

The NJB gives us: “your throne is from God.”

We also see the following statement by respected trinitarian scholars in a footnote for this passage:

45:6 O God. Possibly the king’s throne is called God’s throne because he is God’s appointed regent. But it is also possible that the king himself is addressed as ‘god.’ - Ps. 45:6 f.n. in the NIV Study Bible. [Also see footnote in the NAB, St. Joseph ed. quoted above.]

In addition to the above renderings by many respected translators (most of whom are trinitarian), we have the statement by one of the greatest scholars of Biblical Hebrew of all time, H. F. W. Gesenius. In his famous and highly respected Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament Gesenius renders Ps. 45:6, “thy throne shall be a divine throne.”


Just the admission by so many trinitarian translators (above) that Heb. 1:8 may be honestly translated as it is in the NWT makes any insistence by other trinitarians that this scripture is acceptable evidence for a trinity doctrine completely invalid!

However, there is more evidence, evidence which shows not only that Heb. 1:8 may be honestly translated “God is your throne,” but, indeed, should be so translated!

Notice the context. Heb. 1:8 and 1:9 are being quoted from Ps. 45:6 and 45:7. In Ps. 45:7, speaking to the Israelite king, it says:

“Therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness above your fellows.” - RSV.

Just as this makes it clear that the ancient Israelite king was not God but was anointed by God, HIS God, to a position above his fellows, so does Heb. 1:9, as figuratively applied to Jesus, show that he is not God, but was anointed by his God to a position above his fellows! Context, then, shows that the person addressed in Heb. 1:8 is not God, but one who worships God and was anointed by his God!


The trinitarian Bible scholar, B. F. Westcott, wrote:

“The LXX [Septuagint] admits of two renderings [at Ps. 45:6, 7]: [ho theos] can be taken as a vocative in both cases (‘thy throne, O God, .... therefore, O God, thy God...’) or it can be taken as the subject (or the predicate) in the first case (‘God is Thy throne,’ or ‘Thy throne is God...’), and in apposition to [ho theos sou] in the second case (‘Therefore God, even Thy God...’) .... It is scarcely possible that [elohim] in the original can be addressed to the King. The presumption therefore is against the belief that [ho theos] is a vocative in the LXX. Thus on the whole it seems best to adopt in the first clause the rendering: ‘God is thy throne(or, ‘Thy throne is God’), that is, ‘Thy kingdom is founded upon God, the immovable Rock.’” - The Epistle to the Hebrews, London, 1889, pp. 25, 26.
 

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,997
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Thus on the whole it seems best to adopt in the first clause the rendering: ‘God is thy throne
A totally absurd idea, which is promoted by the Jehovah's Witnesses translation.

When people reject plain Bible truth, they have no choice except to descend into absurdities and nonsense.

"God is thy throne" -- as though someone is going to sit on God, and He is an inanimate throne!
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Encounter Team
Feb 6, 2018
24,579
12,987
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
To use the words "God the Son", as one person has on this subject, is twisting the words that both Jesus and his apostles accurately used, that of Jesus as the "Son of God" and not "God the Son".(John 3:16) It is like taking the words "son of Joseph" and reversing them to read "Joseph the son", which is completely contrary to the original wording and now becomes a distortion of the facts.

Let's use several Scriptures to illustrate this, as for example Matthew 4:4, whereby Satan tempts Jesus with the words: "If you are a son of God, tell these stones to become loaves of bread". Now let's make a reverse: "If you are God the Son, tell these stones to become loaves of bread". Is this accurate ?

Or at Matthew 4:6, whereby Satan says: "If you are a son of God, throw yourself down (off the temple battlement)". Now let's make a reverse: "If you are God the Son, throw yourself down (off the temple battlement)". Again, is this accurate or has someone not being playing with the wording in order to promote a religious ideology not found in the Bible, that of the Trinity.

For example, try to rearrange the wording in a person's will, so that instead of reading "the son of Joseph" as receiving an inheritance from a relative, the words were reversed so to read "Joseph the son" so that the inheritance can now be claimed by Joseph instead of his son. Would a righteous judge permit this or would he not have the person responsible for such wrong action to be called to account.

Now let's read Matthew 27:40, whereby passersby say to Jesus: "You who would throw down the temple and build it in three days, save yourself ! If you are a son of God, come down off the torture stake !" Now let's make a reverse: "You who would throw down the temple and build it in three days, save yourself ! If you are God the Son, come down off the torture stake !" Is this accurate or even logical ? Not at all.

Only a few verses later, the ridiculing passersby says to Jesus: "He (Jesus) has put his trust in God; let Him (or God) now rescue him if He (God) wants him, for he said, ' I am God's Son ' ".(Matt 27:43) Now let's make a reverse: "He has put his trust in God; let Him (or God) now rescue him if He (God) wants him, for he said, ' I am God the Son '. Is this accurate, or is a falsehood being dispensed here ?

The trinity doctrine holds sway over many, and why ? Because they refuse to seriously examine the Bible, but have a religious agenda, not Bible truth, that they wish to perpetuate. How does God feel about this ? All who dispense falsehoods have his disfavor, not love, directed towards them.(see Rev 21:8 concerning "all the liars.....their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur. This means the second death (everlasting destruction, not eternal torment)".

It is not twisted.
However it does HINGE on the Lords Understanding.

God IS "thee Lord God Almighty".
That is INCLUSIVE....of
Lord Jesus
Heavenly Father God
Thee Power Almighty

God IS NOT limited in HOW it pleases Him to "APPEAR" unto mankind.

Even men CAN change their "appearance".

God IS NOT limited in WHAT it pleases Him to be CALLED, at any particular time.

Even men CAN dictate what they shall be "called", at particular times.

Like now for instance, You dictate on this forum you shall be called "Guessman".
I would also bet you are called by many other names and titles.

That does not make you multiple men or not your One self.

God can be at particular times, called;
Father, Son, Spirit, Savior, Holy, Eternal, King, Angel, High Priest, Creator, Maker, Mighty, Truth, Faithful, Life, Light, etc. etc.

Those terms Apply to the Whole of God.

IOW - God IS not limited to BE all places at once, IN Multiple Forms at once, and Called by Multiple Names and Titles.

When God fulfilled His Promise to Walk Among men, He would Remain IN Heaven, WHILE He ALSO Would make Himself Visible to Men ON Earth, HE SAID: He would be "A" Father to He whom He sent to Earth. And He whom He sent to Earth, WOULD BE "A" Son to Him.

Heb 1:5

And the awesome thing is; He provided men who ARE naturally born Against Him; "A" Way, "His" Way, for men to become WITH Him, forever.

And men who elected to Be with Thee Lord God Almighty forever, DO SO, By and Through the Lord, who appeared as A Son of man........AND..........such man WHO Becomes Converted....

Shall ALSO be CALLED "A" son of thee Lord Almighty.

2 Cor 6:18

Jesus IS our example.

God Bless,
Taken
 

Guestman

Active Member
Nov 11, 2009
618
72
28
70
Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No, it is not twisting anything. Please note:

But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. (Heb 1:8)

Is God the Father addressing God the Son in this verse? Absolutely.

It is well known that the King James Bible is archaic English from over 400 years ago, English that is no longer spoken because of considerable changes in its syntax. Therefore, let's start from scratch and look at this from an accurate standpoint of how the Scriptures really read, for Hebrews 1:8 (the apostle Paul quoting from Ps 45:6) does not say, as rendered by the King James Bible: "But unto the Son, he saith, Thy throne O God, is forever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom".

It is accurately translated as: "But about the Son, he says: "God is your throne forever and ever, and the scepter of your kingdom is the scepter of uprightness".(New World Translation) This reads considerably different than the King James Bible due to context and a proper rendering of the Greek into modern English.

Rearranging of words (or spurious additions, such as 1 John 5:7, 8 with the words "in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost; and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in the earth" that is an attempt to promote the trinity or altering words such as 1 Tim 3:16 whereby the accurate words "he who" was altered to read "God" in an attempt to garner support for the trinity) in the King James Bible has happened in several occasions.

For example, at Acts 20:28, according to the King James Bible it reads of the apostle Paul's words: "Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over which the Holy Ghost (the Greek words are hagios pneuma that accurately reads "holy spirit", not Holy Ghost, for the Greek word that is rendered as "ghost" by some is phantasma, which is found in the Bible in only two accounts, at Matthew 14:26 and Mark 6:49 [inaccurately rendered as "spirit" by the King James Bible, for the word "spirit" is from the Greek pneuma] and is properly rendered as "apparition") hath made made you overseers, to feed the church (accurately reads "congregation"[Greek word is ekklesia meaning "called out], not "church" which is derived from the Greek word kuriakon doma that means "house of the lord" and are not found as such in the Bible) of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood".

The online interlinear Scripture4all, reads of Acts 20:28 and note the arrangement of the Greek at the end of the scripture: "ho ekklesia ho theos hos peripoieo dia ho haima ho idios", which literally reads: "the out-called (congregation) of-the God which he-procures thru the blood of-the own (Greek haima ho idios)".(the Greek word for "Son" is missing, but contextually it is seen here)

However, at Hebrews 9:12, the apostle Paul uses these three highlighted Greek words in a different arrangement concerning Jesus, saying: "ho idios haima", which literally means: "of-the own blood ". This scripture is rendered by the New World Translation as "he (Jesus) entered into the holy place, not with the blood of goats and of young bulls, but with his own blood, once for all time, into the holy place and obtained an everlasting deliverance for us." The King James Bible also says "by his own blood (Greek ho idios haima)" here also. The same arrangement of words are also found at Hebrew 13:12.

At both Hebrews 9:12 and 13:12, the King James Bible follows the correct arrangement of Greek words that is supported by the context, but not at Acts 20:28. Why ? To provide support for the trinity, as if Jesus is God, as if he were a person of flesh and blood who gave "his own blood" (Acts 20:28, KJV) instead of "the blood of his own Son".

When speaking to the woman at the well near Sychar, Jesus told her: "God is a Spirit", not flesh and blood.(John 4:24) Hence, those who are reasonable and not biased, can see that the King James Bible has rendered the Greek inaccurately in the above scriptures, to foster support for the trinity.

And does not Hebrews 9:24 say that the "Christ is not entered into holy places made with hands (the temple in Jerusalem), which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us".(King James Bible) Was Jesus offering his life blood to himself or does not the apostle Paul say "in the presence of God" or "appears before God".(New World Translation)

Under the Mosaic Law covenant, what did the sacrificial lamb and its blood on the Passover (that was splashed on the two doorposts and upper part of the doorway to save the firstborn from death) accurately picture ?(Ex 11:5; 12:1-7) Does it not picture Jesus as the "Passover lamb" that was presented to God, not to himself.(1 Cor 5:7)

I could go farther into this, but will let this suffice for now, to show that Jesus is not God, but "the Son of the living God".(Matt 16:16)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigger 2

Willie T

Heaven Sent
Staff member
Sep 14, 2017
5,869
7,426
113
St. Petersburg Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Another take on it:
Hebrews 1:8 The Passion Translation (TPT)

8 But about his Son, he called him “God,” [
a] saying,
“Your throne, O God, endures forever and ever
and you will rule your kingdom
with justice and righteousness,b [
b]

Footnotes:
  1. Hebrews 1:8 Clearly implied in the text and made explicit.
  2. Hebrews 1:8 The Greek used here can mean either justice or righteousness; this translation includes both. The text is literally “the righteous scepter is the scepter of your kingdom.”
 

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,997
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
It is accurately translated as: "But about the Son, he says: "God is your throne forever and ever, and the scepter of your kingdom is the scepter of uprightness".(New World Translation)
Thanks for letting Christians know that the heretical Jehovah's Witness NWT translation is MORE ACCURATE than the KJB!

I already debunked this absurd and nonsensical idea that Christ will sit on God the Father and treat Him as an inanimate throne. Such foolishness and blasphemy from those who call Jesus "a god" (NWT John 1:1).

All these lengthy posts trying to prove that the God the Father does not call Jesus "GOD" (THEOS) are based upon a deliberate distortion of the Scriptures, which were corrupted by heretics to attack the deity of Christ.

Both the Critical and the Recieved texts as well as all English translations other than the NWT support the KJB.

RECEIVED TEXT
πρὸς δὲ τὸν υἱόν, Ὁ θρόνος σου, ὁ Θεός, εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα τοῦ αἰῶνος, ῥάβδος εὐθύτητος ἡ ῥάβδος τῆς βασιλείας σου.

CRITICAL TEXT
πρὸς δὲ τὸν Υἱόν Ὁ θρόνος σου ὁ Θεὸς εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα τοῦ αἰῶνος, καὶ ἡ ῥάβδος τῆς εὐθύτητος ῥάβδος τῆς βασιλείας αὐτοῦ

KING JAMES BIBLE
But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

ENGLISH STANDARD VERSION
But of the Son he says, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Taken and Helen

tigger 2

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2017
916
405
63
84
port angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
A totally absurd idea, which is promoted by the Jehovah's Witnesses translation.

When people reject plain Bible truth, they have no choice except to descend into absurdities and nonsense.

"God is thy throne" -- as though someone is going to sit on God, and He is an inanimate throne!
............................................

Is God ever called “unlikely” things in a figurative sense that are as equally “ridiculous” as calling him “a throne”? Every Bible student of any experience knows that He is, repeatedly!

Many times he is called someone’s “Rock” (e.g., Ps. 78:35).

He is called a “fortress” (e.g., Ps. 91:2).

He is called a “lamp” in 2 Samuel 22:29.

He is called a “crown” (“in that day will Jehovah of hosts become a crown of glory, unto the

residue of his people” - Is. 28:5, ASV).

Jehovah is called “our dwelling place” - Ps. 90:1, KJV.

And “Jehovah is my ... song” - Ps. 118:14.

Also notice Ps. 60:7, 8 “Ephraim is my helmet, Judah my scepter, Moab is my washbasin”, NIV. And in Is. 22:23 we find Eliakim, whom Jehovah said he would call and commit authority to (Is. 22:20, 21), called a “throne” (“and he will become a throne of honor to his father’s house,” RSV).

Not only is it made very clear by many trinitarian translators and text writers themselves that Heb. 1:8 may be honestly translated “God is your throne,” but all real evidence shows that it should be so translated! (And it would be moronic to say that the JW translation inflluenced these many trinitarian experts in any way.)

Enoch 111 also wrote:"Both the Critical and the Recieved texts as well as all English translations other than the NWT support the KJB [translation of Heb. 1:8]." [bolding added]

If you had bothered to read post 21 above, you should know that this is incredibly false! Numerous English Bibles and Trinitarian experts translate Heb. 1:8 as God being called Jesus' throne!! Furthermore, The Received Text and others do not add the word 'is' to the text as you wish. So the text itself (like the many manuscripts it is based on) does not say what you say it does.

So we find once more that Jesus cannot possibly be God. Just as we saw in the case of the Israelite king in Ps. 45:6, 7, if God is his throne (the one supporting him - giving him power and authority), then he cannot be that God!
 
Last edited:

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,150
9,868
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
To All Concerned or interested:

I thought I would do justice to those that have commented on this thread thus far and will add comments in the future as a ‘closed loop’ on my OP to say which belief doctrines or systems I do tend to follow to some degree. I do disagree with some of their ideas...

And these systems were not deliberately sought after, I just so happened to bump into them during my spiritual travels. I would say they valid my beliefs, that they are true or at least on the right track.

I believe these groups are the ‘best’ and the closest I know that practice the truth and are where you will find the highest number/ concentration of true believers. And ironically they compose about 8 percent of all recognized ‘Christian’ groups. Something maybe to consider.

These groups are and NOT in any particular order, the:

- Polish Brethren,

- Jehovah Witnesses,

- Seventh Day Adventists,

- Biblical Unitarians – not the very liberal ‘anything goes’ Universalists.

-Christadelphians,

-Church of God of the Abrahamic Faith,

Again, I do differ in degree with all of those mentioned above. One common denominator of these groups, and I agree with, is they are all non-Trinitarian believers.

Bless all,

APAK
 
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,150
9,868
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I guess I need to clarify 2 areas: SDA used to be completely non-Trinitarian and I meant these folks in my mind, and not the modern ones. Also I view 'anti' and non trinitarian as being both against and not practicing any form of Trinity doctrine.
 

Jun2u

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2014
1,083
362
83
75
Southern CA.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The word “trinity” is not found in Holy Writ nor the words “omniscient” and “omnipresent” yet the serious Bible student cannot deny that God is “all powerful” and “everywhere present.”

The Scriptures tell us there is only One God (Deut 6:4) but it also insists there are three separate and distinct persons that subsist in the Godhead: Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit.

When Paul gave his blessing to the church of Corinth in 2 Cor 13:14, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, he said: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit, be with you all. Amen.”

Since the Bible definitely shows that the Son is God, and it also indicates that the Father is God, and teaches that the Holy Spirit is God, this verse definitely shows there are three persons subsisting in the Godhead.
In Isaiah 6, Isaiah said in verse 5: “mine eyes have seen the King, JEHOVAH of hosts.” Although Isaiah has seen Jehovah seated upon the throne high and lifted up, the apostle John affirmed in John 12:41 that Isaiah actually beheld Christ. And then Paul declares that the message given to Isaiah on this occasion after the vision, Isaiah 6:9 were really spoken by the Holy Spirit.

Isaiah said it was the Father. John said it was the Son. Paul said it was the Holy Spirit. Who is this ONE JEHOVAH? Well, He is God the Father, God The Son, and God the Holy Spirit.

Our minds were not created to understand the Godhead, except what God has revealed in His Word. As Paul would say in his blunt way, “Let God be true and all men liars!”

The above is just a starter. There are many more Scripture references like the above throughout the Bible.

BTW, any and every denomination teach some truths of Scriptures, but that does Not make them a Bible-believing church, that is the Bible alone and in its entirety is the Word of God!

To God Be The Glory
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Encounter Team
Feb 6, 2018
24,579
12,987
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
To All Concerned or interested:

One common denominator of these groups, and I agree with, is they are all non-Trinitarian believers.

Bless all,

APAK

Confused by your post...

You are non-Trinity believing?

No ONE God-head who represents Three?
Lord, God, Almighty...

Yet you say;
Lord, God Almighty and YHWH are One God?

Clarify?

God Bless,
Taken
 

Helen

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2011
15,476
21,157
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
I believe these groups are the ‘best’ and the closest I know that practice the truth
- Polish Brethren,

- Jehovah Witnesses,

- Seventh Day Adventists,

- Biblical Unitarians – not the very liberal ‘anything goes’ Universalists.

-Christadelphians,

-Church of God of the Abrahamic Faith,

APAK

Well , well, well...you could knock me down with a feather!!! :eek:

Well that's you and me done...you are struck off my 'friend' list for sure.
My mother taught me not to talk to strangers....
..and the above is very strange. lol
I've been trying to pin you down for a while...thanks for flopping it all out on the table for us. :)
 

Attachments

  • 037e79b2fb52127537be79110891ae3f.jpg
    037e79b2fb52127537be79110891ae3f.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 0

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,150
9,868
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Confused by your post...

You are non-Trinity believing?

No ONE God-head who represents Three?
Lord, God, Almighty...

Yet you say;
Lord, God Almighty and YHWH are One God?

Clarify?

God Bless,
Taken
Not confusing at all...ONE God Almighty, Lord God or YWHW who has the holy spirit, and ONE son of God, Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour.

There are TWO and these two are not equal.

Bless you,

APAK
 
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,150
9,868
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well , well, well...you could knock me down with a feather!!! :eek:

Well that's you and me done...you are struck off my 'friend' list for sure.
My mother taught me not to talk to strangers....
..and the above is very strange. lol
I've been trying to pin you down for a while...thanks for flopping it all out on the table for us. :)

Helen, your post is a bit stunning and disturbing having a pompous tone and intended to grandstand. Is this really you? It is just very surprising to me.

So, you have been ‘trying to pin me down.’ I do not believe you for a minute Helen. You must know why.

My beliefs have been clear and announced on several Ops and threads. Did you read any of them clearly? I suspect not really. It’s a shame. And it’s a shame when a person tries to show truth in peace and love, in the spirit of the Lord and another condemns them for it. This is what my take away is, here.


Bless you Helen, and may God’s spirit lead you to the peace that only he can bring to your life.


APAK
 

Helen

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2011
15,476
21,157
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Helen, your post is a bit stunning and disturbing having a pompous tone and intended to grandstand. Is this really you? It is just very surprising to me.

So, you have been ‘trying to pin me down.’ I do not believe you for a minute Helen. You must know why.

My beliefs have been clear and announced on several Ops and threads. Did you read any of them clearly? I suspect not really. It’s a shame. And it’s a shame when a person tries to show truth in peace and love, in the spirit of the Lord and another condemns them for it. This is what my take away is, here.


Bless you Helen, and may God’s spirit lead you to the peace that only he can bring to your life.

APAK

Oh come on APAK...I expected better than that from you!!
I was pulling your leg. JOKING!!
I thought you knew me a bit better than that.... but obviously not.

Oh well, I guess you can't win 'em all. :(

Why on earth do you think I sent you a wink and a blown kiss, if I was really being serious, pompous and grandstanding ????
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
9,150
9,868
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Oh come on APAK...I expected better than that for you!!
I was pulling your leg. JOKING!!
I thought you knew me a bit better than that.... but obviously not.

Oh well, I guess you can't win 'em all. :(

Why on earth do you think I sent a wink and a blown kiss????
Well I do apologize then Helen. I get too serious for my own good. I get too straight laced...ignore my very wrong take in my last post.

Wow Helen you are pretty firery at times...give me a heads up next time....I guess I ignored the animation below

Friends still then!! ;)

Bless you,

APAK
 

Helen

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2011
15,476
21,157
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Well I do apologize then Helen. I get too serious for my own good. I get too straight laced...ignore my very wrong take in my last post.

Wow Helen you are pretty firery at times...give me a heads up next time....I guess I ignored the animation below

Friends still then!! ;)

Bless you,

APAK

436f738dd2e6225893ca5977b9ed83cd.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: APAK

Helen

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2011
15,476
21,157
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Sorry, I just thought I sent enough 'clues' of 'being light' in my response to yours.
I will have to watch it from now on.

Sorry for the misunderstanding. x