If a modern interpretation of Daniel (in accordance with Daniel 12:4 & 9) is Preterism, you sadly don't even know what Preterism is. LOLOL
But if you were a man, you'd walk through every aspect of the Daniel 9 prophecy and assess succinct points, instead of waving your hands and proclaiming your conclusions. But I would guess that I've made that request at least a dozen times without any result. So I don't expect this time to be any different.
But if
anyone should want to evaluate exactly what this 9th Chapter actually presents, I'm more than happy to fully evaluate each point, so that the TRUTH of what has been shut up and sealed until the time of the end, can be fully understood at this late time.
Ref:
"How Close Is the Seven Year Tribulation", pg. 4, Post #92,
http://www.christian...on/page__st__90
1. Per Walvoord: "...Montgomery, for all of his scholarship and knowledge of the history of interpretation, ends up with no reasonable interpretation at all.”, P.218
2. Per Walvoord: "...as Young points out, the word ‘sevens’ is in the masculine plural instead of the usual feminine plural. No clear explanation is given except that Young feels ‘it was for the deliberate purpose of calling attention to the fact that the word “sevens” is employed in an unusual sense.’", P.217
3. Per Walvoord: "...Young finally concludes after some discussion that Keit and Kliefoth are correct when they hold that the word ‘sevens’ does not necessarily mean year-weeks, but an intentionally indefinite designation of a period of time measured by the number seven, which chronological duration must be determined on other grounds.” , P.218
4. Per Montgomery: "... efforts to obtain an exact chronology fitting into the history of Salvation, after these 2,000 years of infinitely varied interpretations, would seem to preclude any use of the 70 Weeks for the determination of a definite prophetic chronology.", P. 217
5. Per Walvoord: "Some amillenarians, however, use a literal year time unit for the first sixty-nine weeks but an indefinite period for the last seven years, as in the case of Philip Mauro...", P. 218
6. Per Montgomery: "... the great Catholic chronographers ... as well as those of all subsequent chronographers (including the great Scalinger and Sir Isaac Newton) have failed.. And Edward Young too, finds no satisfactory conclusion for the seventy sevens ... and leaves it without a satisfactory explanation.", P. 217
7. Per Young, regarding "the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem": "This phrase has reference to the issuance of the word, not from a Persian ruler but from God." , P. 224 -
John Wolvoord, "
Daniel, The Key to Prophetic Revelation", Moody Press, Chicago, 1971
8. Per Newton:
"We avoid also the doing violence to the language of Daniel, by taking the seven weeks and sixty two weeks for one number. Had that been Daniel’s meaning, he would have said sixty and nine weeks, and not seven weeks and sixty two weeks, a way of numbring used by no nation."
Isaac Newton, "
Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John (1733)",
http://www.isaacnewt...se/pt1ch10.html
... and ...
As provided in the Topic "How Close Is The Seven Year Tribulation", pg. 5, Post #139,
http://www.christian...n/page__st__120
1.
Daniel 9:2 specifies "years". -- This is a clue.
2.
Daniel 9:2 does not use the simple
shama to perceive the prophecy of Jeremiah as though reading that book, but rather the Soloman
biyn to perceive the prophecy in the BOOKS.-- This is another clue.
3.
Daniel 9:25 "going forth of the word" does NOT have the inference of any edict from man, but rather and edict directly from GOD. -- This is another clue.
4. The
Daniel 9:25 seven is one duration with an anointed one "coming" after that duration. -- And another clue.
5. The
Daniel 9:25 - 26 sixty-two weeks is a second duration with a second anointed one who is cut off after that duration. -- Still another clue.
6. The "weeks"/"week" are the inconcise Masculine gender text, which are specifically NOT 490 years. -- And yet another clues.
7. The second anointed one who is cut off is not killed upon the sixty-two, but simply AFTER. -- The clues keep on coming.
8. The destroyer does not come at the beginning, middle, or upon the end of the seventieth shabuwa, but "shall come" after the seventieth shabuwa. -- You can't handle these clues.
9. The seven, the sixty-two, the seventieth, and after the seventieth are chronologically connected, with NO ~2,000 year gaps. -- And still more clues.
10. This prophecy is shut up and sealed until the time of the end, which is approximate to 1948. -- The final clue which I've identified.
BibleScribe