Their is a huge difference between being "trained" and having an ego power-trip!
That is a biased Opinion.
Police are the so-called "trained" ones. They should not have any expectation that the "un-trained public" has training in specific steps to respond to the Police. If they get "adrenaline" over such interactions, they are unfit for their position.
Yipes. What are you saying? People have NO Reasonable Expectation of Acceptable and Unacceptablr Behavior of People at Large IN the Public?
An utter Ignorance or Decay in Society's Public Behavior?
Not all "verbal commands" are within the responsibilities or rights of the Officer to "Command"!
This is where the issue comes in, that the Bully, or Barnie Fife Officer gets a chip on their shoulder that the person will not "cooperate" with their bullying!
Bullying? What Bullying?
Stop, hand over your license, roll down the window, put you hands on the wheel or in the air, step out of the car, stand back, sit here, be quiet, lie down, put you hands behind your back, and many other commands the Officer uses to Assess a situation and encounter and his own safety, with the Public...
That's Bullying??
Not everything a Cop believes that they have a right to is a valid "command" even though in their arrogance, they do not see it that way! Police abuse this assumed "principle" all the time!
Arrogance? Biased Opinion.
Corrupt society ... Corrupt Effect.
A Citizen should use their Rights to not cooperate with the Officer! Where they are required to do so, they must,
Really? They Must?
The captured video showed the man REFUSING to sit in the Police Vehicle.
Police tried to force the man into the Police Vehicle ... guess the Officers could have said...hey his Bodily trunk in in the vehicle, to hell will him dangling his feet out of the vehicle...shut the door...???
but the Police do not differentiate being uncooperative where people have to, and where they do not.
Backwards...people do not differentiate when they are legally bound to comply with an Officers command...or exercise their Right to keep their mouth shut.
I do not have to answer any question I am asked...
Correct.
that is being "uncooperative"!
No, that is you making a choice to Exercise your Right to keep your mouth shut!
He was in HANCUFFS! What was he going to do? Waddle down the road?
Handcuffs are a restraint, not custody or necessarily control.
Why did they not just place him in the car?
Good question...WHY didn't the man choose to enter the car when told to? And instead chose to do everything to avoid entering the car ?
If he was on the ground, what justification would there be in putting a knee on his throat?
I see no justification for an Uncooperative cuffed man to have a knee placed on his Throat.
Even a nitwit should reasonably know Slight pressure on a "Throat" can impede air flow to a persons lungs.
When did anyone put a knee on another person's "THROAT" ?
What justification could the three witnessing policemen have for allowing a crime occur in front of them?
What crime?
What possible justification do they have for failing to look out for the health and safety and welfare of a detained man already in their custody?
The man's health and safety? You mean when the man notified Police he had a heart condition or had taken illegal stimulant drugs...so the Police could safely and adequately deal with an uncooperative person with a known heart condition or illegal drug user?
Oh wait...the man amid his uncooperation failed to mention his heart health condition or having stimulant drugs in his system.
Failure to OBEY their COMMANDS" is not a reasonable defense!
Really? You just said, there Are Commands a person MUST Obey....
And now you say there is No reasonable Defense "for" NON compliance of what a person MUST do.
That is a recipe for Lawlessness.
Brooks did not have a reason to "Cooperate," for no one has to say or do anything they feel might incriminate themselves.
Was a man being told to sit in a police car...or the man being cooperative and sitting the police car....incriminating?
Every person is supposed to be presumed as innocent until proven guilty in a court of law! These Cops were the Judge, the Jury, and the Executioners!
These Cops judged And Convicted the man of using a counterfeit 20$ bill? And then executed him for that? Eh...no.
Every person ...every person??? That's funny, the police Officers were CONVICTED in the Media!
When did the Media become the Courtroom?
Driving is a Privilege, not a right.
Correct. Driving while sleeping, or under the influence is neither a right or privledge.
Brooks was required to comply with presenting his license and registration, and to exit the vehicle. He did so.
Correct.
The problem is when Brooks attacked the UNPROFFESSIONAL Police Officers who allowed him to disarm one of them of their taser... a non-lethal weapon!
Uh, you are Blaming a cop Because a person Violated the Law BY Touching an Officer and his Gear?
That's ridiculous!
After he turned and the attack was over, the threat was no longer present! There would be no reason to shoot and kill someone for hurting your little Blue, butt-hurt Pride!
Conjecture and biased Opinion.
While neither dead Black person involved was "Cooperative" in every aspect, yet neither were a direct threat to anyone's lives when they were murdered by the Police!
I don't give a flip what color a man's skin is, and notice you have decided a Police Officer has Commited murder, without a Courtroom ruling.
So as Judge and Jury...when do you expect you will be sentencing an execution?
Glory to God,
Taken
