This case questions the use of lethal force by police
Mr Floyds case questions police brutality
Brutality - meaning-
savage physical violence
The term Brutality toward police is used, by the public, anytime the public refuses to cooperate.
However, I don't understand how it has been turned into a question about racism.
What makes these two cases racist? Is it simply because it was a black man? Is that all it takes now to point the finger and yell racist?
Racist has become pretty much an exclusive Term Meaning: any white person who does not yield to a black person.
Racist meaning-
a person who shows or "feels" discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who "believes" that a particular race is superior to another.
Racism hinges on an individual's "feelings" and "beliefs".
A person calling "another" person "a racist", hinges on the person's "feelings" and "belief".
Racism is not against the Law.
The government can not create Laws regarding a person's "feelings" or "belief".
If i hire a white man over a black man does that make me racist? Off course not.
True. However, it is the feelings and belief of "another" that is determing you might be a racist...not your feelings or belief.
It's a "poor me" "entitlement" phenomena...
On one hand you have a portion of society-
Baby makers, can't/don't provide for them/uneducated/live in crowded trashy neighborhoods/
That is not exclusive to any one race.
On the other hand you have Prominate Black "leaders/spokesman" (carrying the title of Reverend) which by such title appears to be a person of trust, that Preaches Black people are "Entitled", to receive Something for Nothing (no effort/work), Exclusively Because they ARE Black.
Many Blacks have Embraced, the Something for Nothing attitude.
And Many Blacks have taken Two different routes:
1) From the poorer neighborhoods:
* focus on Talents, society accepts:
Sports Talents: Music Talents: or fast money in drug dealing.
2) From any neighborhood:
* Reject the notion of something for nothing, take advantage of education opportunities, succeed and deal with ups and downs like any other person providing for themselves and family.
There are countless possible reasons why a black person was in that situation.
The left want to paint a broad brush of racism over it.
The Left "panders" to "Feelings". They reinforce people, particularly the poor or minorities, ARE sub-par, ARE NOT Talented enough, Smart enough, to take care of themselves without the Government (SCRAP PROGRAM)...aka Welfare.
Welfare was introduced as: "Helping hand Public Charity program"... until a person could get "back on their feet.
Problem: The great Majority of people on Welfare...were Never "on their feet"!
Welfare has become a "Generational" lifestyle.
AKA, SCRAP program? Yes. It first requires the (primary bulk) middle working class to be (taxed) on what they earn BY WORKING. A compelled Forced TAX (not charity). The government (takes their handsome cut!) for collecting the tax...and then doles out the "leftovers" to those the Government has Decided "ARE QUALIFIED".
Then to consider who uses the Scraps "as" a helping hand until they "get back", on their feet, and those who never desire to Earn their own Way, generationally remaining on the Scraps that Another has Earned, but complain continuously they Want more Freebies, and the Left gives them Promises of Hope, to Raise Taxes, so they CAN be doled out More Freebies.
It's a VICIOUS cycle...and lends to a great deal of Political Divide, Public Divide and Political Authorized Compelled Theft.
Is police brutality a problem in the sates? Yes
Disagree.
I would say supposed "police Brutality" is more of A LOUD Accusation by a Few, rather than A Fact.
Police are daily confronted with Unknown people daily...Drug induced, Drunks, Mentally Unstable, Gang mentality, Different social/education standing, depressed, sick, happy, healthy, respectful, disrespectful, Cooperative, Uncooperative People...all day long.
The Public at Large...has the advantage of Picking and choosing...WHO They will come in contact and WHO they will Avoid.
That ^ advantage is Not Afforded a Police Officer. Nor does a Police Officer KNOW what ANY person May or May Not DO at any given moment.
ANY decision the Public makes during contact with a Police Officer...will determine...if the Individual is "PHYSICALLY" harmed or Not.
Then there is Consideration...of "Financial" harm or "Freedom" harm.
^ That is more on the mind and Consideration of the Individual. "They know if They are drunk, drug induced, carrying drugs, sick, depressed, happy, have warrants, have a rap sheet, etc.
The Individual who at any moment becomes Uncooperative, decide WHEN and HOW they will Flee, to AVOID...a financial burden of court costs AND potiental Freedom LOSS.
At the Moment an Individual, DOES "whatever" he has decided is his FLEE plan...the Officer is now on a split-second defense Reaction mode....(His own safety becomes paramount)...at the same time of Apprehension/ Stopping the individual Fleeing.
Only about 27% of Police Offers have used their gun to shoot.
Clubs, cuffs, pepper spray, stun guns, wrestling a person into a body lock...to Force Physical Control over an UNCOOPERATING, individual.
A fleeing individual, is typically chased, particularly with caution (if they were not yet patted, and unknown IF they have a gun, knife, needles, drugs, they could use on the Officer.) In one particular recent case, the man had taken an Officers (stun gun), was fleeing, while displaying he knew how to use the stun gun, and had a willingness TO use the stun gun).
An Officer (typically) does not have to Put his life in jeopardy, up close, one on one with an individual "surely" knowing the Individual HAS "something" in his possession that could Subdue the Officer. The Officer decided to Shoot the man to Stop his Fleeing.
It is a Crime for any individual TO Touch an Officer OR their "gadgets" ( or whatever you want to call them ) that are belong to the Officer.
The Crime the fleeing man Committed on the Officer was a charge of Assault against the Officer. The man would have been Arrested for that Assult IF he had thereafter Cooperated.
The initial case of the man holding up traffic in a public drive through restaurant ...as with the Assault Charge would have proceeded through the Court System, and a virdict and SENTENCING rendered...which is what Justice IS.
People are gathering in the streets under the GUIZE, of peaceful protest, that at any moment becomes A Raging out of control MOB, (destroying property) who chant Accusations, whose Feelings are their motive, who the Media enflames, (whereby the Media) has already CONVICTED involved Police Officers, and the MOB is chanting they WANT the Justice, they have decided is a Death Penalty!
All the Facts have Become Irrelevant, the Court System Irrelevant...The Officers have already been Tried in the Media. The Sentence has Already been Decided by the MOB and MOB sympathizers...and the Media keeps Fanning the Emotions, making a boatload of $$$.
All that is needed is A Judge awing the Gavel and Pronounce a Death Sentence for Police Officers.
An Every time a Judge Swings the Gavel against a WHITE Police Officer, the Black Racist MOB mentality have a "feeling" of contentment "they" have WON a Victory Against "Whitey".
Is police racism a problem in the states? Doesn't look like it
Police Forces all around the US are madeup of Whites, Hispanics, Blacks, Jews, Gentile's, Muslims, men, women, Different Cultures, educational, backgrounds, religious beliefs...that
are Joined Together in a Brotherhood... regardless of Their historical background.
Racists try their Best to publically Expose their "FEELINGS" and ... AND Attempt to publically portray a RACIAL Divide among Police Officers...(sure a few police officers will stomp in alliance with the MOB)... However the Majority of Police Officers Have their Alliance with "their" "Brotherhood"
...regardless of Race, political, Religious standings, and Public Racist MOB and Media, pot-stirrers.
There will always be Accusations of Racism and Racism of some Races who flat out claim to be Racist, (blacks and whites) who join in their own Brotherhood claiming superiority over all other Races.
The POINT Being: Racism is Based "ON Feelings". How one "FEELS" is the individual's Right to decide...(not some unknown MOB of strangers) And so what? Feeling are not governed by Law.
Calling someone a Racist...is an old worn out Tactic, used BY an Uncooperative person, to Deflect Away from them, in an Attempt to put another person on a Defense to Prove they are Not Racist.
I know what I am, believe, feel. Some stranger making Accusations toward me DOES NOT Require me to Defend my feelings or beliefs or even Consider a strangers Tactic.
Bottom Line: Police Officers are trained under authority of their own states Laws.
Surprise::
Not all states have the Same Laws!
Surprise:::
State's Laws regularly Change!
Surprise:::
It is up to the Public to KNOW the Laws, within the "Jurisdiction" they reside, do business, or travel.
Surprise:::
Ignorance of the Law, is NOT a Defense.
People, with MOB mentality, traveling to other Jurisdictions, to hook up with a local MOB...and Become unruly, may be subdued by a Police Office "they" feel is unlawful...So What? They Should have Learned what they could EXPECT for their unruly Behavior.
Glory to God,
Taken
