For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.
1. If all flesh is born with a sin 'spirit', then so was Jesus' flesh made with sin 'spirit' by the seed of Adam through David.
(Note: not all flesh on earth would be born of sin, but only man's. The rest of the mortal living creatures are still cool with God as made in the beginning.)
2. If Jesus flesh was sinful, then He still was tempted in all points like as we, and without sinning, while also being like as we in sinful flesh.
Much more then is being born of sin nature without excuse for sinning. His sinful flesh and bones are still to walk as He walked, enduring all temptation without sinning.
3. If Jesus was not made of flesh with sin 'spirit', while all other men are, then neither are His flesh and bones today, but are born of God with new sinless flesh as He.
Neither of these of course is true, since no flesh is born of a sin spirit, neither man nor beast.
And so, the reading of Scripture in context of all flesh being mortal grass, and Jesus made of the seed of David in the flesh, ought therefore be:
God sending his own Son in the likeness of flesh of sinful man, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh, unlike sinful man.
Unrepentant sinners didn't want Jesus to righteously come in the same flesh as they, nor His righteous flesh and bones today.
Antichrists preach against the righteous coming in the flesh, as being self-righteous heresy against all flesh born with a sin 'spirit'.
OSAS preaches a superman christ made of another kind of flesh, that they cannot possibly live like, and jehovah worshippers preach a superhero christ deified after the flesh, that they cannot possibly live like.
1. If all flesh is born with a sin 'spirit', then so was Jesus' flesh made with sin 'spirit' by the seed of Adam through David.
(Note: not all flesh on earth would be born of sin, but only man's. The rest of the mortal living creatures are still cool with God as made in the beginning.)
2. If Jesus flesh was sinful, then He still was tempted in all points like as we, and without sinning, while also being like as we in sinful flesh.
Much more then is being born of sin nature without excuse for sinning. His sinful flesh and bones are still to walk as He walked, enduring all temptation without sinning.
3. If Jesus was not made of flesh with sin 'spirit', while all other men are, then neither are His flesh and bones today, but are born of God with new sinless flesh as He.
Neither of these of course is true, since no flesh is born of a sin spirit, neither man nor beast.
And so, the reading of Scripture in context of all flesh being mortal grass, and Jesus made of the seed of David in the flesh, ought therefore be:
God sending his own Son in the likeness of flesh of sinful man, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh, unlike sinful man.
Unrepentant sinners didn't want Jesus to righteously come in the same flesh as they, nor His righteous flesh and bones today.
Antichrists preach against the righteous coming in the flesh, as being self-righteous heresy against all flesh born with a sin 'spirit'.
OSAS preaches a superman christ made of another kind of flesh, that they cannot possibly live like, and jehovah worshippers preach a superhero christ deified after the flesh, that they cannot possibly live like.
Last edited: