That's a short list.
Do you not believe Jesus is Deity? I didn't realize that of you.
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's a short list.
If a Bible translation was full of errors (as you claim) it could not have stood the test of time for over 400 years.
I think this is more like familial love, or brotherly affectionate love. I think Christian love is much different. I think it's not so much about feelings and desires, rather, values and choices.When you fell in love with someone you have a great burning desire to please them.
Thanks!By the way, GP, while I agree with your premise, I can't say as I fully sympathize with your source here.
I would use other citations, or simply write something out myself.
Please clarify why you would say that.That's a short list.
Do you not believe Jesus is Deity? I didn't realize that of you.
Much love!
Your link.Please clarify why you would say that.
Why are there so many men who love God's Word, who've studied the original languages, who actually have international ministries winning souls, who don't see this KJV-onlyist viewpoint? Why is it always a bunch of ignorant hillbillies defending KJV-Onlyism?I am not interested in anti-KJV propaganda, especially since I have fully researched the matter. If a Bible translation was full of errors (as you claim) it could not have stood the test of time for over 400 years.
And I am not "pretending" to say anything. I have documentary EVIDENCE to prove that you are simply blowing hot air (possibly trolling).
Why do some people feel the need to be insulting to others?ignorant hillbillies
Wow, you know what, I was mistaken! I thought that the presentation was (oddly--I wasn't aware they even offered such things) a presentation made by Biblehub.com so I thought it was trustworthy. Thanks for pointing that out!Your link.
"Most modern translations agree that this was an uninspired and erroneous addition to the Latin Vulgate used to support the unscriptural doctrine of the Trinity."
Or perhaps a Oneness doctrine? I guess it doesn't have to be that Jesus isn't deity.
Does that not represent your view?
Much love!
I have no problem with hillbillies, I'm saying that billbillies don't know much, so they have no place to speak on issues that require an education to speak on--and all the educated men of God who love God and are bearing fruit always take a stance against KJV-Onlyism.Why do some people feel the need to be insulting to others?
???
Interestingly, I've heard the Quran was only standardized in the 1950s!Sure it could. The Koran has stood for a lot longer than just 400 years. It is filled with errors, is it not? Or are you assuming that the church alone is incapable of making any such errors?
I have no problem with hillbillies, I'm saying that billbillies don't know much, so they have no place to speak on issues that require an education to speak on--and all the educated men of God who love God and are bearing fruit always take a stance against KJV-Onlyism.
It's not about Enoch, the point is that in all my conversations, in all the debates, in all the presentations, it's always the case that men of God who are knowledgeable and who I can respect (even if I disagree with them on some or many points) take the stance against KJV-Onlyism, but fruits and nuts like "Pastor" Steven Anderson who take the stance for it--and I think Enoch should take note of that fact and get a clue.I see.
So, what was it that clued you in to @Enoch111 that he is an ignoramus from Appalachia?
Much love!
I changed the links due to your correction. Thanks.I see.
So, what was it that clued you in to @Enoch111 that he is an ignoramus from Appalachia?
Much love!
So then when you said that . . .It's not about Enoch, the point is that in all my conversations, in all the debates, in all the presentations, it's always the case that men of God who are knowledgeable and who I can respect (even if I disagree with them on some or many points) take the stance against KJV-Onlyism, but fruits and nuts like "Pastor" Steven Anderson who take the stance for it--and I think Enoch should take note of that fact and get a clue.
Why is it always a bunch of ignorant hillbillies defending KJV-Onlyism?
Well, let's put it this way : I wouldn't be surprised if Enoch were an ignorant hillbilly. "Birds of a feather" LOLSo then when you said that . . .
. . . you didn't actually mean that everyone who defends KJV onlyism is an ignorant hillbilly?
How very imprecise.
Much love!
It looks like this is just a part of your vocabulary.but fruits and nuts like