God's likeness?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

DPMartin

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2014
2,698
794
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Since God originally made man to be in his own image, in the image of God. And needless to say that was not fulfilled at the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and was recreated or reestablished or fulfilled to God’s satisfaction, in the flesh Christ Jesus.

Hence, does God identify that which is like Him? And truly, what is His likeness and image in the flesh?
 

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
6,056
1,232
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
DPMartin said:
Since God originally made man to be in his own image, in the image of God.
Yes he did.

And needless to say that was not fulfilled at the tree of knowledge of good and evil,
It has nothing to do with what happened there.


and was recreated or reestablished or fulfilled to God’s satisfaction, in the flesh Christ Jesus.
Again, that isn't related to Adam's sin. To be made in God's image is to be formed in a body like God's. It is not related to being spiritually or morally like God.

Hence, does God identify that which is like Him? And truly, what is His likeness and image in the flesh?
Exactly what the terms mean...to look like God in a general physical sense.
 

OzSpen

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2015
3,728
795
113
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
spencer.gear.dyndns.org
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
ewq1938 said:
Again, that isn't related to Adam's sin. To be made in God's image is to be formed in a body like God's. It is not related to being spiritually or morally like God.

Exactly what the terms mean...to look like God in a general physical sense.
This is an error of fact because 'God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth' (John 4:24 ESV).
 

OzSpen

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2015
3,728
795
113
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
spencer.gear.dyndns.org
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
DPMartin said:
Since God originally made man to be in his own image, in the image of God. And needless to say that was not fulfilled at the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and was recreated or reestablished or fulfilled to God’s satisfaction, in the flesh Christ Jesus.

Hence, does God identify that which is like Him? And truly, what is His likeness and image in the flesh?
You need to define what your understanding is of how human beings are made in the image of God.
 

DPMartin

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2014
2,698
794
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
ewq1938 said:
Yes he did.


It has nothing to do with what happened there.



Again, that isn't related to Adam's sin. To be made in God's image is to be formed in a body like God's. It is not related to being spiritually or morally like God.


Exactly what the terms mean...to look like God in a general physical sense.
Maybe your image of your god is flesh, but the Lord God, Creator and Judge that is referred to in the bible is Spirit. Flesh is in no way like or in the image of spirit. You’re going to have to read the bible to understand what I refer to. For the example, the Word was made flesh to fulfill what God made man for, as in the Gospel according to John. Read that chapter to start with. What Adam and Eve died from wasn’t flesh or they wouldn’t have been after their conversation with the Lord.
 

DPMartin

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2014
2,698
794
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
OzSpen said:
You need to define what your understanding is of how human beings are made in the image of God.

I guess you are going to have to read the bible and see what the Lord God says and reveals Himself as. Man doesn’t define his Creator, man’s Creator defines man.

Though yes there are those who create their own gods, in their own image of what they think their god ought to be. I do believe the Lord God refers to that as setting up idols in their own hearts.
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
DPMartin said:
Since God originally made man to be in his own image, in the image of God. And needless to say that was not fulfilled at the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and was recreated or reestablished or fulfilled to God’s satisfaction, in the flesh Christ Jesus.

Hence, does God identify that which is like Him? And truly, what is His likeness and image in the flesh?
In seeking to understand the traditional family, Christians should keep in mind that not only are individual persons created in the image of God, but so is the family itself. The human family is the closest analogy that mankind will ever come to concretely understanding the Blessed Trinity.

The creeds teach that while there is one God, He exists in three distinct persons. The bible, on the other hand, reveals that man is made in the 'image of God'. From these two truths, therefore, we can acknowledge that the complete image of God is found in the Triune understanding of Him.

This understanding of His Triune nature is reflected by the human family whose personal relationships approach the likeness of the Trinity.
There are multiple demonstrations of this truth.

Consider the unity of the Trinity which is reflected in the unity of the family. Or the "family of persons" which is found in both. The persons of the Trinity share the 'same substance ' while a human family becomes one flesh: wife with husband and parents with children.

There is also another element in the Trinity that lends itself to human likeness. The Nicene Creed professes this about the Trinity: "We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life who proceeds from the Father and the Son."

In Catholic theology, the Holy Spirit is said to proceed from the will of both the Father and the Son, or in other words, through the activity which they engage in, otherwise known as "love".

The Holy Spirit is poured forth through the exchange of love between the Father and the Son. This is why perhaps Jesus says to the Apostles:
" Unless I go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you." (John 16:7)

In the eternal economy of the Trinity, therefore, a person 'proceeds' from the love between two other persons. And so, the Holy Spirit is love 'proceeding' or 'coming from' the first two persons of the Blessed Trinity.

The human family has a rather striking parallel to this dynamic. The ultimate act of intimacy in a marriage mirrors the eternal exchange of love between the first two persons of the Trinity.

And like the eternal or continual procession of the Holy Spirit in the Trinity, the act of love between a man and a woman causes a 'procession' of another human person (i.e. the birth of a child).
 

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
6,056
1,232
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
DPMartin said:
Maybe your image of your god is flesh, but the Lord God, Creator and Judge that is referred to in the bible is Spirit.

God the Father and God the Son have physical bodies according to multiple scripture. The only part of the Trinity that is bodiless spirit is the Holy Spirit.

You’re going to have to read the bible to understand what I refer to. For the example, the Word was made flesh to fulfill what God made man for, as in the Gospel according to John. Read that chapter to start with.
I've read the bible more times than I can count. Actually I would like to refer you to the scriptures that show your view of the Father is incorrect:

Does the Father have a body? Yes:

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping
thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.


Two words are used:

Gen_1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.


There is no need to debate who the "we" are here but it definitely included God the Father and someone or more than one someone. Most believe it includes Angels so let's use that to simplify things.

image
H6754
???
tselem
tseh'-lem
From an unused root meaning to shade; a phantom, that is, (figuratively) illusion, resemblance; hence a representative figure, especially an idol: - image, vain shew.


The underlined is not particularly important since that is the definition of this word's root word but the rest of the text is this words actual definition. Here we see that essentially the "figure" of something is is a physical representation of the original. It would be akin to a boy being extra tall like his father and maybe grandfather. That boy would be the "figure" of his male relative in a physical sense. Angels have the basic head, two arms and legs and torso...the basic "human" type design. God the Father has been seen and described in the scriptures and has the same physical design. It is then clear he used his own form, whether a permanent or a temporary form, as a pattern for much of his creations ie: Angels and Mankind.

likeness
H1823
??????
demu^th
dem-ooth'
From H1819; resemblance; concretely model, shape; adverbially like: - fashion, like (-ness, as), manner, similitude.


And this word has the same basic meaning as well.


So, if our physical image is after God's then we should not be surprised that the Father also has a body, as does his Son and Angels etc.



Gen 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:


Here we see the same exact words and wording. The meaning is exactly the same: someone who physically resembled their parent.


Gill


man being the principal part of the creation, and for the sake of whom the world, and all things in it were made, and which being finished, he is introduced into it as into an house ready prepared and furnished for him; a consultation is held among the divine Persons about the formation of him; not because of any difficulty attending it, but as expressive of his honour and dignity; it being proposed he should be made not in the likeness of any of the creatures already made, but as near as could be in the likeness and image of God.

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image,.... Which consisted both in the form of his body, and the erect stature of it, different from all other creatures


Here are some scriptures which show that the Father does have hands and arms and a head and hair....and....well you get the idea...he is not a spirit according to what Christ said, "a spirit hath not flesh and bones"

Dan 7:9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have hair or clothes, but the Father does.

Clarke:


The Ancient of days - God Almighty; and this is the only place in the sacred writings where God the Father is represented in a human form.

Rev 5:7 And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne.
Rev 5:8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have hands, but the Father does.


See, there is this view, as seen in the above scriptures and then there is another view that holds the Father is nothing more than "a bodiless spirit". This view would then suggest when we stand before God in heaven, there's only going to be one person there who is God. In my opinion this view of God is inaccurate and contradicts a great deal of scriptures.

I fully believe Jesus will be there as well as his Father and we will see the both of them just as we see in the above scriptures.


Gen 3:8 And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.


Adam and Eve could HEAR the sound of God walking! Does a bodiless spirit walk? Does a bodiless spirit make a sound when "walking"?


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" nor does a spirit make walking sounds while walking.


Gen 32:24 And Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day.
Gen 32:25 And when he saw that he prevailed not against him, he touched the hollow of his thigh; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was out of joint, as he wrestled with him.
Gen 32:26 And he said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he said, I will not let thee go, except thou bless me.
Gen 32:27 And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob.
Gen 32:28 And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.
Gen 32:29 And Jacob asked him, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, thy name. And he said, Wherefore is it that thou dost ask after my name? And he blessed him there.
Gen 32:30 And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.

Here Jacob not only wrestles with God physically, he also was allowed to see His face and live.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't arms and hands and a face and certainly couldn't physically wrestle a human being, but the Father does and did.

Gill:


though he had wrestled with one so vastly superior to himself, who could have easily crushed this worm Jacob to pieces, as he is sometimes called; and though he had had such a sight of God as face to faces referring, as is thought, to a notion that obtained early, even among good men, that upon sight of God a man instantly died; though we have no example of that kind: but perhaps he observed this for his encouragement; that whereas he had met with God himself, and wrestled with him in the form of a man, and yet was preserved, he doubted not that, when he should meet with his brother and debate matters with him, he should be safe and unhurt.

(note: M.H. here believe this is Jesus Christ not the Father but the basic concept is still the same, God in a physical form. I believe it was the Father.)

Mathew Henry:


This was doubtless the Lord Jesus Christ, who, among the patriarchs, assumed that human form, which in the fullness of time he really took of a woman, and in which he dwelt thirty-three years among men. He is here styled an angel, because he was µe?a??? ß????? ???e???, (see the Septuagint, Isa_9:7), the Messenger of the great counsel or design to redeem fallen man from death, and bring him to eternal glory; see Gen_16:7.
But it may be asked, Had he here a real human body, or only its form? The latter, doubtless.
Barnes:


There are, then, three acts in this dramatic scene: first, Jacob wrestling with the Omnipresent in the form of a man, in which he is signally defeated; second, Jacob importunately supplicating Yahweh, in which he prevails as a prince of God; third, Jacob receiving the blessing of a new name, a new development of spiritual life, and a new capacity for bodily action.
Gen_32:31-32
Peniel - the face of God. The reason of this name is assigned in the sentence, “I have seen God face to face.” He is at first called a man. Hosea terms him the angel (Hos_12:4-5 (3, 4). And here Jacob names him God. Hence, some men, deeply penetrated with the ineffable grandeur of the divine nature, are disposed to resolve the first act at least into an impression on the imagination. We do not pretend to define with undue nicety the mode of this wrestling. And we are far from saying that every sentence of Scripture is to be understood in a literal sense. But until some cogent reason be assigned, we do not feel at liberty to depart from the literal sense in this instance. The whole theory of a revelation from God to man is founded upon the principle that God can adapt himself to the apprehension of the being whom he has made in his own image. This principle we accept, and we dare not limit its application “further than the demonstrative laws of reason and conscience demand.” If God walk in the garden with Adam, expostulate with Cain, give a specification of the ark to Noah, partake of the hospitality of Abraham, take Lot by the hand to deliver him from Sodom, we cannot affirm that he may not, for a worthy end, enter into a bodily conflict with Jacob.



Act 7:55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,
Act 7:56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.


Stephen was full of the Holy Spirit and he was able to see what normally is not visible to us. He saw Jesus standing next to the Father. He saw two individuals, the same two we can see in many other scriptures. It is incorrect to erase the Father from all these scriptures and replace him with Jesus alone as a real visible "person".

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" yet Stephen actually saw his body, recognizing the Father visually as well as the Son.


1 Kings 22:19 And he said, Hear thou therefore the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left.

Many have seen God, the LORD, literally sitting on a literal throne. That is simply because God has a literal body and form and sits upon a literal throne.


2Pet 1:17 For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

The Father not only has a real body just as Christ does, but he is also fully capable of speaking audibly even though Christ is the Word of God. That doesn't mean the Father cannot speak for himself.



Exo_31:18 And he gave unto Moses, when he had made an end of communing with him upon mount Sinai, two tables of testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God.

Deu_9:10 And the LORD delivered unto me two tables of stone written with the finger of God; and on them was written according to all the words, which the LORD spake with you in the mount out of the midst of the fire in the day of the assembly.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have fingers, but the Father does.


Exo 33:20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.
Exo 33:21 And the LORD said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock:
Exo 33:22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by:
Exo 33:23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.


Here we see that he does have a face, has a hand, and has "back parts" of a body. Moses was not allowed to see his face, but he saw his hand and saw his "back parts".


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have a face, and a hand, and "back parts", but the Father does.


Exo 24:9 Then went up Moses, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel:
Exo 24:10 And they saw the God of Israel: and there was under his feet as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were the body of heaven in his clearness.
Exo 24:11 And upon the nobles of the children of Israel he laid not his hand: also they saw God, and did eat and drink.


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have a visible body with feet, but the Father does.

Gill:


and there was under his feet; which shows that there was a visible form
Clarke:


The seventy elders, who were representatives of the whole congregation, were chosen to witness the manifestation of God
Joh 5:16 And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day.
Joh 5:17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.
Joh 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.
Joh 5:19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.
Joh 5:20 For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth: and he will shew him greater works than these, that ye may marvel.
Joh 5:21 For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
Joh 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
Joh 5:23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
Joh 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
Joh 5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.
Joh 5:26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;
Joh 5:27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.
Joh 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
Joh 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.
Joh 5:31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.
Joh 5:32 There is another that beareth witness of me; and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true.
Joh 5:33 Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth.
Joh 5:34 But I receive not testimony from man: but these things I say, that ye might be saved.
Joh 5:35 He was a burning and a shining light: and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light.
Joh 5:36 But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me.
Joh 5:37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.
Joh 5:38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not.


Jesus said to the Jews that they have never heard the voice of the Father. Does that mean the Father has no voice? No. The Jews simply had never heard the Father's voice.

Jesus said to the Jews that they have never seen the shape of the Father. Does that mean the Father has no shape? No. The Jews simply had never seen the Father's shape.

This proves that the Father does in fact have a voice and a shape which is testified in many scriptures as truth.


Rev 5:7 And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne.
Rev 5:8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.

Here God is in physical form and literally has a book in his right hand, which is attached to his right arm. Here we see the literal right arm as well as the figurative right arm, Jesus.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have hands or arms, but the Father does.


What Adam and Eve died from wasn’t flesh or they wouldn’t have been after their conversation with the Lord.

That statement makes no sense. Please re-word it.
 

DPMartin

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2014
2,698
794
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Man became a living soul.
Your interpretation of what may seem to be a miss understanding of Catholicism way out there man. You better get some counsel.
Gen:6:3: And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
Job:7:11: Therefore I will not refrain my mouth; I will speak in the anguish of my spirit; I will complain in the bitterness of my soul.
Ps:31:5: Into thine hand I commit my spirit: thou hast redeemed me, O LORD God of truth.
Ps:77:3: I remembered God, and was troubled: I complained, and my spirit was overwhelmed. Selah.
Ps:77:6: I call to remembrance my song in the night: I commune with mine own heart: and my spirit made diligent search.
 
Ezek:36:27: And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.
Prov:1:23: Turn you at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you.


[edited by the mod] Jesus says God is a Spirit and men have spirit, where have you been? God is the Father of Spirits.
 

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
6,056
1,232
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
DPMartin said:
Get some help, really. Jesus says God is a Spirit and men have spirit, where have you been? God is the Father of Spirits.
Don't tell me to "get help". This post is reported.
 

DPMartin

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2014
2,698
794
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
kepha31 said:
In seeking to understand the traditional family, Christians should keep in mind that not only are individual persons created in the image of God, but so is the family itself. The human family is the closest analogy that mankind will ever come to concretely understanding the Blessed Trinity.
Many species of animals have and maintain families, what are you talking?
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
DPMartin said:
Many species of animals have and maintain families, what are you talking?
I'm talking an analogy. The human family is analogous to understanding the Triune nature of God. It's just an analogy for us dumb people because the smartest people in the world with 5 Ph.D.s in theology cannot fully comprehend God.
"Many species of animals" are not made in the image and likeness of God. Humans are because Scripture says it and so do the Creeds.
 

DPMartin

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2014
2,698
794
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
kepha31 said:
I'm talking an analogy. The human family is analogous to understanding the Triune nature of God. It's just an analogy for us dumb people because the smartest people in the world with 5 Ph.D.s in theology cannot fully comprehend God.
"Many species of animals" are not made in the image and likeness of God. Humans are because Scripture says it and so do the Creeds.

Well I’m trying to show you that despite the fact that man was originally made in God’s image. The family isn’t necessarily a part of that, just because men have families. Since man is made in God’s image and likeness and as you say animals are not, then family isn’t related to the image and likeness of God because animals have families. The flesh we live in that is made of dust and the social systems we use for our mutual well being in this life are provided by God to live the life given use. Dog’s are given what they have of the earth and it designed for then to live the life given them. Bug’s fish so on and so forth.
Therefore, to see God isn’t something that is of creation, because God is not of creation. But again Jesus says God is a Spirit, and to be worshiped in Spirit and Truth. These things for example, are not things of the earth, or family practices. But yet the scripture plainly says the man became a living soul.

According to scripture God is a Spirit, and creation knows it’s creator through His Word and all things made were made through His Word. Therefore look to Jesus:
Jn:1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2: The same was in the beginning with God.
3: All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4: In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
DPMartin said:
Well I’m trying to show you that despite the fact that man was originally made in God’s image. The family isn’t necessarily a part of that, just because men have families
. I said the family is an analogy to the Triune nature of God. Not "part of".
a·nal·o·gy (google)



noun




  1. a comparison between two things, typically on the basis of their structure and for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
    "an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"




    • a correspondence or partial similarity.
      "the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"




    a thing that is comparable to something else in significant respects.
    "works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"


    Since man is made in God’s image and likeness and as you say animals are not, then family isn’t related to the image and likeness of God because animals have families.
  1. A non sequitur fallacy. Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises. In a non sequitur, the conclusion could be either true or false, but the argument is fallacious because there is a disconnection between the premise and the conclusion. (wikipedia)
    Example:
    I have legs.
    monkeys have legs
    therefore I am a monkey.

    Animals have families
    humans have families
    therefore families are not made in God's image.

    I also said individuals are made in the image and likeness of God. Maybe you missed that too. If you want to take "man" as meaning Adam by himself, you go right ahead.









Therefore, to see God isn’t something that is of creation, because God is not of creation. But again Jesus says God is a Spirit, and to be worshiped in Spirit and Truth. These things for example, are not things of the earth, or family practices. But yet the scripture plainly says the man became a living soul.
Scripture plainly said, "Let US make man in OUR image". Genesis 1:26 Deal with it. Furthermore, I never said God is part of His creation. See the above definition for analogy.




DPMartin said:
According to scripture God is a Spirit, and creation knows it’s creator through His Word and all things made were made through His Word. Therefore look to Jesus:
Jn:1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2: The same was in the beginning with God.
3: All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4: In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
Looks like John knew Genesis quite well. John 1:1 is the same as Gen. 1:1. John 1 also hints at 6 days of creation as scripture scholar Scott Hahn indicates.

Since God originally made man to be in his own image, in the image of God. And needless to say that was not fulfilled at the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and was recreated or reestablished or fulfilled to God’s satisfaction, in the flesh Christ Jesus.

Jesus came to restore what was lost, sanctifying grace, which was evacuated from the soul of Adam and his descendants .

John 1:18 - the Greek word for "only-begotten" is "monogenes" which means unique, only member of a kind. It does not mean created.
 

OzSpen

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2015
3,728
795
113
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
spencer.gear.dyndns.org
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
DPMartin said:
I guess you are going to have to read the bible and see what the Lord God says and reveals Himself as. Man doesn’t define his Creator, man’s Creator defines man.

Though yes there are those who create their own gods, in their own image of what they think their god ought to be. I do believe the Lord God refers to that as setting up idols in their own hearts.
This is a red herring fallacy. Your response has nothing to do with what I asked of you: 'You need to define what your understanding is of how human beings are made in the image of God'. We are dealing with the interpretation of Scripture. What does is mean to say that human beings are made in the image of God. What's your interpretation of its meaning?

Your can try to deflect to read the Bible and those who create their own gods. That was not the issue I raised with you. I'm asking for your understanding of what the Bible says when it makes the statement that human beings are made in the image of God. Since God is spirit, how can human beings be in his image?

Oz
 

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
6,056
1,232
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
kepha31 said:
John 1:18 - the Greek word for "only-begotten" is "monogenes" which means unique, only member of a kind. It does not mean created.


No that's not what it means:

G3439
μονογενής
monogenēs
mon-og-en-ace
From G3441 and G1096; only born, that is, sole: - only (begotten, child).


It means the only born as in the only child a parent has ever had. That can change if the parent has another child. All born children are created including Jesus. It was the Word who was and is God that entered the human body of the child named Jesus. The soul and spirit were not created but the human body was created. That how God the son could die on the cross. He had to have a created mortal body that was able to die. No part of God can die because God is always immortal and unable to die so a mortal body was created for God to inhabit.
 

OzSpen

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2015
3,728
795
113
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
spencer.gear.dyndns.org
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
ewq,

You have committed the question begging logical fallacy. You have started with your own belief, 'God the Father and God the Son have physical bodies' and then you set out to prove your presupposition by providing a list of Scriptures. That's what a question begging fallacy does. Your conclusion is in your premise and that is what you have created here.

I notice that you conveniently left out John 4:24 (NIV), 'God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth'. This verse DOES NOT say, 'The Holy Spirit is spirit'. It says God (the Trinitarian God revealed in the NT) is spirit.

The verses you use to try to prove that God has a body, do not prove that at all. I do not have the time to go through all of these verses, but let us look at the first one you gave:

Gen 1:26-27 (ESV) and man being made in God's image. There is little in that text to tell us exactly what it means for the first man to be made in God's image. There is nothing here to demonstrate that it means that human beings have a body, just like God has a body. That is not stated here. It can't be, because 'God is spirit' (John 4:24). Note the beginning of Gen 1:26, 'And God said, "Let US make...."' Since God is a plurality here with the use of 'us', it must refer to the Trinity. It is simply stated. It is not fully explained. That happens further in the Bible.

In Gen 1:26-27 we have the double description that the man will be made by God 'in our image, after our likeness'. These terms 'image' and 'likeness' of God do state that human beings are patterned after God, but that does not state that God is a physical being, just as a human being is physical.

We get some further insight into what they mean in Eph 4:24 (ESV): 'Put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness'. Ah, there we have a glimpse of what the 'likeness of God' means. It refers to righteousness and holiness. Col 3:10 (ESV) explains further: 'And have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator'. So the image of the Creator includes knowledge, renewed knowledge.

Martin Luther wrote, 'I understand this image of God to be ... that Adam not only knew God and believed in Him that He was gracious; but that he also led an entirely godly life' (in Leupold 1942:89). Don Stewart has refuted your view that God has a body in 'Does God have a body?'

So, your interpretation of God having a physical body is NOT supported by your use of Gen 1:26-27.

In other verses, you seem to be confused by the use of anthropomorphisms in Scripture. What are they?
'Anthropomorphisms [from Greek ἄνθρωπος (anthrōpos) = man/human + μορφή (morphē) = form] are figures of speech which represent God as having human characteristics, form or personality. They are symbolic descriptions, which help to make God’s attributes, powers and activities real to us' ('Does God have body parts?').
They are figures of speech and are not descriptions of God having physical attributes.

Are you a Mormon? The Mormon's believe 'God has a body' (Mormon Handbook). It's a false doctrine created by Mormons.

Works consulted
Leupold, H C 1942. Exposition of Genesis, vol 1. London: Evangelical Press .

Oz


ewq1938 said:
God the Father and God the Son have physical bodies according to multiple scripture. The only part of the Trinity that is bodiless spirit is the Holy Spirit.


I've read the bible more times than I can count. Actually I would like to refer you to the scriptures that show your view of the Father is incorrect:

Does the Father have a body? Yes:

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping
thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.


Two words are used:

Gen_1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.


There is no need to debate who the "we" are here but it definitely included God the Father and someone or more than one someone. Most believe it includes Angels so let's use that to simplify things.

image
H6754
???
tselem
tseh'-lem
From an unused root meaning to shade; a phantom, that is, (figuratively) illusion, resemblance; hence a representative figure, especially an idol: - image, vain shew.


The underlined is not particularly important since that is the definition of this word's root word but the rest of the text is this words actual definition. Here we see that essentially the "figure" of something is is a physical representation of the original. It would be akin to a boy being extra tall like his father and maybe grandfather. That boy would be the "figure" of his male relative in a physical sense. Angels have the basic head, two arms and legs and torso...the basic "human" type design. God the Father has been seen and described in the scriptures and has the same physical design. It is then clear he used his own form, whether a permanent or a temporary form, as a pattern for much of his creations ie: Angels and Mankind.

likeness
H1823
??????
demu^th
dem-ooth'
From H1819; resemblance; concretely model, shape; adverbially like: - fashion, like (-ness, as), manner, similitude.


And this word has the same basic meaning as well.


So, if our physical image is after God's then we should not be surprised that the Father also has a body, as does his Son and Angels etc.



Gen 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:


Here we see the same exact words and wording. The meaning is exactly the same: someone who physically resembled their parent.


Gill









Here are some scriptures which show that the Father does have hands and arms and a head and hair....and....well you get the idea...he is not a spirit according to what Christ said, "a spirit hath not flesh and bones"

Dan 7:9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have hair or clothes, but the Father does.

Clarke:





Rev 5:7 And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne.
Rev 5:8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have hands, but the Father does.


See, there is this view, as seen in the above scriptures and then there is another view that holds the Father is nothing more than "a bodiless spirit". This view would then suggest when we stand before God in heaven, there's only going to be one person there who is God. In my opinion this view of God is inaccurate and contradicts a great deal of scriptures.

I fully believe Jesus will be there as well as his Father and we will see the both of them just as we see in the above scriptures.


Gen 3:8 And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.


Adam and Eve could HEAR the sound of God walking! Does a bodiless spirit walk? Does a bodiless spirit make a sound when "walking"?


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" nor does a spirit make walking sounds while walking.


Gen 32:24 And Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day.
Gen 32:25 And when he saw that he prevailed not against him, he touched the hollow of his thigh; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was out of joint, as he wrestled with him.
Gen 32:26 And he said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he said, I will not let thee go, except thou bless me.
Gen 32:27 And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob.
Gen 32:28 And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.
Gen 32:29 And Jacob asked him, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, thy name. And he said, Wherefore is it that thou dost ask after my name? And he blessed him there.
Gen 32:30 And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.

Here Jacob not only wrestles with God physically, he also was allowed to see His face and live.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't arms and hands and a face and certainly couldn't physically wrestle a human being, but the Father does and did.

Gill:





(note: M.H. here believe this is Jesus Christ not the Father but the basic concept is still the same, God in a physical form. I believe it was the Father.)

Mathew Henry:




Barnes:







Act 7:55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,
Act 7:56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.


Stephen was full of the Holy Spirit and he was able to see what normally is not visible to us. He saw Jesus standing next to the Father. He saw two individuals, the same two we can see in many other scriptures. It is incorrect to erase the Father from all these scriptures and replace him with Jesus alone as a real visible "person".

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" yet Stephen actually saw his body, recognizing the Father visually as well as the Son.


1 Kings 22:19 And he said, Hear thou therefore the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left.

Many have seen God, the LORD, literally sitting on a literal throne. That is simply because God has a literal body and form and sits upon a literal throne.


2Pet 1:17 For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

The Father not only has a real body just as Christ does, but he is also fully capable of speaking audibly even though Christ is the Word of God. That doesn't mean the Father cannot speak for himself.



Exo_31:18 And he gave unto Moses, when he had made an end of communing with him upon mount Sinai, two tables of testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God.

Deu_9:10 And the LORD delivered unto me two tables of stone written with the finger of God; and on them was written according to all the words, which the LORD spake with you in the mount out of the midst of the fire in the day of the assembly.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have fingers, but the Father does.


Exo 33:20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.
Exo 33:21 And the LORD said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock:
Exo 33:22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by:
Exo 33:23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.


Here we see that he does have a face, has a hand, and has "back parts" of a body. Moses was not allowed to see his face, but he saw his hand and saw his "back parts".


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have a face, and a hand, and "back parts", but the Father does.


Exo 24:9 Then went up Moses, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel:
Exo 24:10 And they saw the God of Israel: and there was under his feet as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were the body of heaven in his clearness.
Exo 24:11 And upon the nobles of the children of Israel he laid not his hand: also they saw God, and did eat and drink.


"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have a visible body with feet, but the Father does.

Gill:




Clarke:




Joh 5:16 And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day.
Joh 5:17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.
Joh 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.
Joh 5:19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.
Joh 5:20 For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth: and he will shew him greater works than these, that ye may marvel.
Joh 5:21 For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
Joh 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
Joh 5:23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
Joh 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
Joh 5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.
Joh 5:26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;
Joh 5:27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.
Joh 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
Joh 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.
Joh 5:31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.
Joh 5:32 There is another that beareth witness of me; and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true.
Joh 5:33 Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth.
Joh 5:34 But I receive not testimony from man: but these things I say, that ye might be saved.
Joh 5:35 He was a burning and a shining light: and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light.
Joh 5:36 But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me.
Joh 5:37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.
Joh 5:38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not.


Jesus said to the Jews that they have never heard the voice of the Father. Does that mean the Father has no voice? No. The Jews simply had never heard the Father's voice.

Jesus said to the Jews that they have never seen the shape of the Father. Does that mean the Father has no shape? No. The Jews simply had never seen the Father's shape.

This proves that the Father does in fact have a voice and a shape which is testified in many scriptures as truth.


Rev 5:7 And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne.
Rev 5:8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.

Here God is in physical form and literally has a book in his right hand, which is attached to his right arm. Here we see the literal right arm as well as the figurative right arm, Jesus.

"a spirit hath not flesh and bones" and they don't have hands or arms, but the Father does.




That statement makes no sense. Please re-word it.
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
OzSpen said:
This is a red herring fallacy. Your response has nothing to do with what I asked of you: 'You need to define what your understanding is of how human beings are made in the image of God'. We are dealing with the interpretation of Scripture. What does is mean to say that human beings are made in the image of God. What's your interpretation of its meaning.
I gave a concrete and best analogy to understanding the Trinity and the relationship of each of the Divine Persons. That's all we can use is analogy and androphoricisms because God cannot be defined.
Father, mother, baby = one flesh.
Father, Holy Spirit, Son = One Being. Please scroll up to post #7.


Your can try to deflect to read the Bible and those who create their own gods. That was not the issue I raised with you. I'm asking for your understanding of what the Bible says when it makes the statement that human beings are made in the image of God. Since God is spirit, how can human beings be in his image?
A mystery is defined as something that transcends reason, but does not go against reason. The Trinity is a mystery, the analogy of a family helps us to understand what cannot be understood.


An image is not an actuality just as a photograph of your mother is not your mother, it is am image of your mother. The photo is an image and likeness of your actual physical mother. How can human beings be made in his image? See Gen. 1:26. God created, He took his divine camera and made a Selfie, and called him Adam (metaphorically speaking). He gives human beings immortal souls (spirit) at conception and the power to pro-create. God doesn't make babies, people do, but God gives each of us an immortal soul at conception. See Psalm 139:13
I hope this answers your question.
 

OzSpen

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2015
3,728
795
113
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
spencer.gear.dyndns.org
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
There is a view being promoted in this thread that God has a physical body. This is a heresy from the fourth century known as Audianism, taught by Audius (or Audaeus). You can read the nature of this heresy in 'Audianism Explained'.

See an explanation of the heresy in Ecclesiastical History (Theodoret), Book IV, Chapter 9, 'Of the heresy of the Audiani'. It explains that

Audæus, a Syrian alike in race and in speech, appeared at that time as an inventor of new decrees. He had long ago begun to incubate iniquities and now appeared in his true character. At first he understood in an absurd sense the passage Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. From want of apprehension of the meaning of the divine Scripture he understood the Divine Being to have a human form, and conjectured it to be enveloped in bodily parts; for Holy Scripture frequently describes the divine operations under the names of human parts, since by these means the providence of God is made more easily intelligible to minds incapable of perceiving any immaterial ideas. To this impiety Audæus added others of a similar kind. By an eclectic process he adopted some of the doctrines of Manes and denied that the God of the universe is creator of either fire or darkness. But these and all similar errors are concealed by the adherents of his faction.
Oz
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
ewq1938 said:
No that's not what it means:

G3439
μονογενής
monogenēs
mon-og-en-ace
From G3441 and G1096; only born, that is, sole: - only (begotten, child).


It means the only born as in the only child a parent has ever had. That can change if the parent has another child. All born children are created including Jesus. It was the Word who was and is God that entered the human body of the child named Jesus. The soul and spirit were not created but the human body was created. That how God the son could die on the cross. He had to have a created mortal body that was able to die. No part of God can die because God is always immortal and unable to die so a mortal body was created for God to inhabit.
Nestorianism (5th Century)
This heresy about the person of Christ was initiated by Nestorius, bishop of Constantinople, who denied Mary the title of Theotokos (Greek: "God-bearer" or, less literally, "Mother of God"). Nestorius claimed that she only bore Christ’s human nature in her womb, and proposed the alternative title Christotokos ("Christ-bearer" or "Mother of Christ").
Orthodox Catholic theologians recognized that Nestorius’s theory would fracture Christ into two separate persons (one human and one divine, joined in a sort of loose unity), only one of whom was in her womb. The Church reacted in 431 with the Council of Ephesus, defining that Mary can be properly referred to as the Mother of God, not in the sense that she is older than God or the source of God, but in the sense that the person she carried in her womb was, in fact, God incarnate ("in the flesh").
There is some doubt whether Nestorius himself held the heresy his statements imply, and in this century, the Assyrian Church of the East, historically regarded as a Nestorian church, has signed a fully orthodox joint declaration on Christology with the Catholic Church and rejects Nestorianism. It is now in the process of coming into full ecclesial communion with the Catholic Church.
The Great Heresies
That wouldn't be you, would it?