- Aug 10, 2012
- 6,109
- 7,516
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
Thank you for your question Iforest, I value your perspective.
Would you agree that God has all-perfect, good morals?
Yes, he doesn't act against his nature which is all good.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Thank you for your question Iforest, I value your perspective.
Would you agree that God has all-perfect, good morals?
Hi Mary!
Thank you for your response, it is much appreciated. That is a great question! Before I respond to your reasoning behind asking the question, would you mind if I ask you something? I think that God is the ultimate source of morality and truth. He makes a set of laws for the world to follow, would you agree? If you agree, would sin, then, be the opposite of God's law?
Natalie
It seems to me you are suggesting we (humankind) are unable to properly define or interpret what God said. I disagree with you.
<snip>. You are suggesting that teaching of the Truth stopped. When did it stop? It seems you are suggesting God abandoned us in a life boat out in the middle of the ocean. Why would he do that?
I seem to believe the abortion is murder and babies going to heaven were two different conversations....I could be wrong....I was once before in my life ;)
I agree with you...babies and young children go to heaven when they die.
Thank you for your blessings.
Love, Mary
Hi Natalie,Mary,
I agree with you that man is able to interpret scripture. I do not think that the correct way to define scripture has been lost, either. Your question about who exactly defines God's law correctly is a tough one. Because yes, there are many who define God's law (the scriptures) very differently, such as homosexually or abortion being right/wrong. Would you say that a lot or most of confusion from the scriptures is because of misinterpretation of it?
Thank you for your insightful responses,
Natalie
Hi Helen,Hey again Mary.
You put words in my mouth!
#1 I never suggested that man could not interpret scripture! ( where did I say that? )
Obviously you would disagree with that, ....so would I!! :)
#2 You also say that I suggest that truth stopped!! ( and Where did I say that? Truth just IS... it does not stop it is a constant. Just as God is, Jesus is the revelation of Truth, he said that HE is the Way, the Truth and the Life.
How could that stop?
We as mere mortals , and as we stay close to God..we will get more and more light/truth and understanding as we walk in His Light, therefore "I " believe we come into more and more truth as we grow in God. So, where the stopping comes in,I don't know.
#3 You also say that I suggest God has abandoned us in some life boat....
Where did I say that? ( that one I cannot answer because I don't understand it)
Goodness that is three things I seem to have "suggested"...I must be a worse communicator than I thought!
I knew I was not good, and have often said as much...but goodness where do these "suggestions" come from? ...can you quote my statements/suggestions back to me? Thanks.
Ref #1 I believe man under the anointing of God as teacher, can understand scripture. Then you stock answer is always- " But who says, which Denomination has interpreted scripture correctly."
Bless you...H
Hi Pia,@"ByGrace" ...It isn't often that I disagree with you Helen, but I must here,......NO, it's not you who is being a bad communicator....Thought this 'lady' had her day with all that spreading what seems like deliberate dissension ? There have been a couple of people I have noticed who seems to only write when they can try to pick someone else apart....I'm so sure Jesus would be pleased ( not )..... Your post is very very good...
Have a good day dear Lady and I hope you can get to do what you're hoping for here![]()
Nothing wrong with it :)...but there is a point in our lives when lookingBut why not talk about things of the world and sin as well? Doesn't it connect to God's victories?
Hi Helen,
You left me with the impression that man could not interpret scripture when you said God has defined sin, but man has redefined sin. To define something is to give it a meaning. I agree with you God defined sin in scripture. According to you man has REDIFINED sin. If we are REDIFINING Gods words we are misinterpreting them. True?
If we, in the year 2018, are redefining Gods words then that means we have stopped teaching The Truth that the Apostles taught. Since the Apostles didn't redefine Gods words and the people the Apostles taught didn't redefine Gods words at some point man started redefining (misinterpreting) Gods words. If we are redefining and misinterpreting Gods words then that means we don't know the Truth of His words. That means God has abandoned us in a life boat. We are still floating (alive/safe) but he's not coming to our rescue to help us figure all this out. Since we no longer know the truth of his words your definition (or redefinition) of sin is just as valid as mine. Clear as mud??? ;)
I have good news for you Helen. We DON'T have to wait until the end to find out on who's side truth falls correctly. Scripture tells us that Jesus started a Church and that The Church is the pillar and foundation of Truth. I agree with you that Truth just IS... it does not stop it is a constant. I do not believe God is hiding that Truth from us until we die, like you seem to believe. The Church is the protector of Truth and the gates of hell will not prevail against it, just like scripture said. It seems to me you are suggesting that He gave us the truth in scripture and he is holding us accountable to that truth and if we don't follow/accept/practice His truth He throws us in eternal damnation BUT HE'S NOT GOING TO REVEAL THAT TRUTH TO US UNTIL WE DIE???? That is when we will find out who knew The Truth? That sounds like a mean God who is playing a joke on us.
You are not a bad communicator. I just read to much into others statements.
Mary
Pia,@"ByGrace" ...It isn't often that I disagree with you Helen, but I must here,......NO, it's not you who is being a bad communicator....Thought this 'lady' had her day with all that spreading what seems like deliberate dissension ? There have been a couple of people I have noticed who seems to only write when they can try to pick someone else apart....I'm so sure Jesus would be pleased ( not )..... Your post is very very good...
Have a good day dear Lady and I hope you can get to do what you're hoping for here![]()
Thank you Helen.@pia and @Marymog Listen ladies..please don't fight over this...it really isn't worth it...honestly.
As we know there is way too many unpleasant posts on this site...
myself not at all innocent of such, or of over-reacting and slashing back when provoked. It happens to all of us. ;)
Not worth it.
Hugs to you both... Helen. x
Hi Natalie,
Would you please reply to my post to you (#14) so that we can keep our conversation separate from my conversation with ByGrace? Your going to confuse an old lady like me by responding to my questions via someone else’s post.![]()
Yes, he doesn't act against his nature which is all good.
lforest, thanks for your response!
I agree with you! Then wouldn't you say that there is a standard to morals rather than only one person’s belief in what is right and wrong? (In other words, God’s standard)
Natalie
Isaiah 5:20 says:
"Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter."
So this would mean God sets the standard, as otherwise those who redefine good and evil wouldn't be doing wrong.
Welcome Natalie!Hi everybody! I am a Christian and a high school student in Wisconsin. In my Apologetics class, we were asked to practice what we have learned and I am interested in engaging in a thoughtful and friendly discussion with anybody about Christianity! I love talking about morality and sin, however I am open to any question you guys have. So please ask! Thanks :)
Isaiah 5:20 says:
"Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter."
So this would mean God sets the standard, as otherwise those who redefine good and evil wouldn't be doing wrong.
I gave you a "Like".lforest,
Exactly! So then no one has perfect morals except for God, correct? But, then couldn't we conclude that no one is moral except for God? Even though we follow God's law, we can never follow his moral standards perfectly. We can say that someone is morally right in believing in one of God's law (even if they are not Christians), but no one is moral without God. If we just defined moral as what one person thinks as right or wrong, then we could say that (as an extreme example, haha) if one man thought that murdering his neighbor was right, we would not have the right to impose on his morals or say he has "bad" morals. "Good" moral beliefs, then, would not be a personal belief of right and wrong, but an agreement with God's law. Would you agree?
Natalie
lforest,
Exactly! So then no one has perfect morals except for God, correct? But, then couldn't we conclude that no one is moral except for God? Even though we follow God's law, we can never follow his moral standards perfectly. We can say that someone is morally right in believing in one of God's law (even if they are not Christians), but no one is moral without God. If we just defined moral as what one person thinks as right or wrong, then we could say that (as an extreme example, haha) if one man thought that murdering his neighbor was right, we would not have the right to impose on his morals or say he has "bad" morals. "Good" moral beliefs, then, would not be a personal belief of right and wrong, but an agreement with God's law. Would you agree?
Natalie