ScottA
Well-Known Member
It seems to me that you have asked this in a couple of different ways...so I thought I would chime in:Was Jesus the son of man per Mary?
As I was explaining that the scriptures are only an image (the likeness of) what is true on high, the prophecies of Jesus include both likenesses: both that of the Son of God, and also the Son of man. That is because the Son of man is the likeness of the Son of God, who is the image of God. This is where the idea of God incarnate comes from, but "born" is a rather crude term for what it actually means. A better definition would be "of." Just as you are of your father and I am of mine, Jesus was of the Father (of God). But in His case, "born" "of", by definition, assumes too much of the worldly and human example or likeness. In other words, it is fine for us to use the term born for human child birth, but what is born of God is not of the world as we once were, but rather are "of" God and "of" the kingdom of God. The difference, then, is that what is born of God is not a mere image, but is the real thing; while what is born of man is that mere image.
Incidentally, this is the reason that the so-called incarnation of Christ and the path to the kingdom of God is a narrow one. For though there are many who bear the image (are born of the image) of God into this world of imagery, there is only One begotten out of it. Thus, we must come through (or in) Jesus in order to enter the kingdom of God. He is that narrow way.