You truly have mastered the skill of ad hominem...which isn't really a skill per se since it comes naturally to most, but it is what it is.
BTW
Ad hominem?
No, friend. That wasn’t an insult, it was an autopsy.
What I dismantled wasn’t
you — it was the
Scofield-Zionist fantasy theology you’re clinging to like a life raft in a storm of scripture.
When someone:
Preaches two peoples of God
(refuted: Ephesians 2:14–16 — “He made the two into one… destroying the dividing wall”)
Denies the Church is the Bride
(refuted: 2 Corinthians 11:2 — “I betrothed you to one Husband… to present you as a pure virgin to Christ”)
Claims unbelieving Israel still holds the covenant
(refuted: Galatians 3:29 — “If you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed”; Romans 9:6–8 — “Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel”)
Rewrites God’s timeline to fit a prophecy chart from 1909
(refuted: Hebrews 8:13 — “He has made the first covenant obsolete”; Luke 22:20 — “This cup is the new covenant in My blood”)
Says the Church is just a “parenthesis” in God’s plan
(refuted: Ephesians 3:4–6 — “The mystery… is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs… partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus”)
Teaches the Kingdom was postponed because the Jews rejected it
(refuted: Mark 1:15 — “The Kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe the Gospel”)
Says animal sacrifices will return in a Third Temple
(refuted: Hebrews 10:14 — “By one offering He has perfected forever those who are sanctified”)
Claims national Israel will reign over the world after the Second Coming
(refuted: Revelation 5:10 — “You have made them a kingdom and priests… and they shall reign on the earth”)
Says Jesus will rule from an earthly throne in Jerusalem
(refuted: John 4:21 — “You will neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem worship the Father”)
Declares modern, Christ-rejecting Israel “God’s chosen”
(refuted: Romans 2:28–29 — “A true Jew is one inwardly… by the Spirit, not the letter”)
^ Refuting this Scofield/Rothschild scheme from 1909 isn’t me being “mean.”
It’s me doing exactly what Paul did when false teachers tried to rebuild what Jesus already tore down.
“I wish those who unsettle you would emasculate themselves.”
— Paul, Galatians 5:12
He didn’t hold back and neither will I.
Because this isn’t just some harmless prophecy theory, it’s a
satanic diversion, a
Zionist Trojan horse, and a counterfeit gospel that
fractures the Body of Christ and
feeds unbelief with your tithes and tanks.
You keep whining about tone, but the real problem isn’t how I said it.
The problem is
what I hit.
And maybe it stings because your entire “faith” is propped up by:
A conman with a publishing contract,
A set of footnotes from Hell,
And a geopolitical idol founded by
atheists, occultists, and Christ-deniers —
Not the
blood-stained cross of the risen King.
You shout “Don’t touch the apple of God’s eye!”
But the Bible says:
“Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either.” (1 John 2:23)
Modern Israel — the Rothschild-funded, UN-approved secular nation —
denies the Son.
Therefore, according to the
Word of God, they do
not have the
Father.
And you’re not blessing them, you’re blessing
their rebellion.
You think this is “supporting prophecy”?
No, this is
funding antichrist theology with blood and missiles while calling it obedience.
You’ve traded:
Pentecost for Tel Aviv,
The New Covenant for bloodline nostalgia,
The Bride of Christ for a red heifer and a third temple to await the antichrist,
and the Gospel of the Kingdom for Scofield’s, Zionist fairytale born in Hell.
Again, no Christian on EARTH believed this blasphemous insanity before 1909.
Not Peter, not Paul, not Ignatius, not Polycarp, not Irenaeus, not Justin Martyr,
not Clement of Rome, not Clement of Alexandria, not Tertullian, not Cyprian,
not Origen, not Athanasius, not Basil the Great, not Gregory of Nyssa,
not Gregory of Nazianzus, not Ambrose, not Jerome, not Augustine,
not Chrysostom, not Hilary of Poitiers, not Ephrem the Syrian,
not Cyril of Jerusalem, not Cyril of Alexandria, not Leo the Great,
not John of Damascus, not Maximus the Confessor, not Theodoret,
not Bede, not Anselm, not Aquinas, not a single saint, bishop, elder,
or martyr in the history of the Church taught the garbage you’re defending.
Not one.
They all believed in
one covenant, fulfilled in Christ.
One people of God.
One Church.
One Israel — in the Spirit.
And they would’ve rebuked Scofield’s two-track, race-based theology as a
doctrinal cancer from Hell —
a blasphemous mutation that fractures the Body of Christ and denies the power of the Cross.
Because they all understood what you refuse to accept:
The Body of Christ is Israel — and there is no other.
Outside of Christ, there is nothing but
judgment.
That Rothschild/UN abomination in the Middle East that you keep sending tanks, tithes, and tears for?
It’s
not holy.
It’s
not blessed.
It’s a geopolitical idol —
an affront to God and literally a
middle finger to the risen King who already fulfilled the covenant in His blood.
Your theology doesn’t come from the apostles.
It doesn’t come from the Church.
It doesn’t come from the Holy Spirit.
It comes from
Oxford Press, Rothschild money, and a convicted conman with a pen in 1909.
Repent — before the King returns,
and finds you waving the flag of unbelief,
while you call it "prophecy".