In that he teaches that people are not "in Christ" unless they are walking completely without sin - and who among us would claim, I have not sinned today? His claim is that you move in and out of being In Christ. That we should all desire oh so strongly that we could somehow be found worthy for God to move to bring us "into Christ", to walk in Zion with Christ, and so live holy, and without sin.
The Bible says we are free from sin now. The Bible says we are in Christ now. The Bible says that In Christ, we have every spiritual blessing. The Bible says that we are to reckon the old man dead. God tells us we are dead to sin and alive to God, and instructs us to live that way in the power of the Spirit which we have Right Now. Not in some hoped for future.
His doctrine denies these Scriptures, and teaches that being born again isn't enough, you have you take hold of something more, gain your own righteousness, so you can then be saved.
This is not the Bible I read, but Episkopos has revealed himself that he has little to no regard for the Bible. It's a book of law to him and we are to follow the Spirit.
He quotes from it, but when someone comes back to him with Scripture, we are no more than dogs to him.
It's in the teaching. It's in the attitude. Does Episkopos ever say good things? Error is generally mixed with truth.
I've obviously said too much already. Do we all say wrong things? Of course I know I do. This is absurd.
Much love!