Doug, can you tell us what you are thinking on verses 7 and 8?
Ezekiel 39:7 So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel. 8 Behold, it is come, and it is done, saith the Lord GOD; this is the day whereof I have spoken.
I looked at several commentaries on this and none of them gave a reference where God previously spoke about that day. The commentaries suggested Revelation 16:17 where the angel says it is done after the seventh bowl is poured out and also Revelation 21:6 where He that sat on the throne tells John to write for these words are true and faithful, then says it is done.
My question for you is do you know what verse Ezekiel 39:8 is referring back to where God previously spoke of that day?
The point is on the day Jesus returns will be the fulfillment of Ezekiel 39:7. On the day Jesus returns they will say:
"Behold, it is come, and it is done, saith the Lord GOD; this is the day whereof I have spoken."
And the verse they talk about will be Ezekiel 39:7, pointing out God's Word given to Ezekiel.
Many point out current Israel is not worthy to be called Israel. That will change when Jesus arrives and removes the blindness in part, and sits in judgment to remove ungodliness from Israel. Only a third will survive that judgment. Jesus is going to change a lot of things on that day He arrives. How long that judgment and final harvest takes no one knows nor can give a length.
As for the 7 years, what does it mean to spiritually benefit for 7 years? The literal interpretation would mean that this conflict would financially benefit Israel for 7 years. I don't think this 7 years starts at the Second Coming.
Changing Israel at the Second Coming is one thing. This conflict is another thing. This conflict is said to take place on the mountains and in the fields. No cities or people are harmed nor destroyed in this conflict. But Israel will be the primary beneficiary from this conflict without much damage to Israel at all.
That is why it seems this conflict will be construed as something else, because the Second Coming is not mentioned at the time of this conflict, but near to when this conflict will occur. One cannot use this conflict as a sign of the Second Coming. Because this is not the same conflict mentioned in Zechariah 14. In that conflict it will be all nations.
I have pointed out that even in the Syrian conflict, Israel and Iran were fighting proxy wars at each other in Syria. But Israel is still not going to turn to God, just because of some military or financial gains. It will not be until the Second Coming when that happens.
But it seems that every time there is a war surrounding Israel to the point any nation thinks they can directly attack, Israel, that attack has been thwarted. I see in Ezekiel 39 a reason masked to wipe out Israel, but was thwarted. I don't see Ezekiel 39 as every nation in agreement though. That is why the Syrian Civil War fits Ezekiel 39. Not all nations were involved, nor directly attacking each other or the cities of Israel, but it did take place on the mountains of Israel, and Israel fought Iran indirectly. It was not like Israel was sitting by idle.
Also most all of and more than mentioned nations were directly involved in the Syrian Civil War. One group led by Russia was backing the President. Another group led by Arabic countries, the removal of that President. A conflict that did indirectly bring Israel into the action. At the end even Turkey made a land grab of new territory for Turkey. Turkey would like more chunks of Israel no matter who it sides with, NATO or Russia. But Syria sits on land promised to Abraham. I think that is a fact that should be considered as well. At one point Israel is going to do something or God will, that unites all the nations against Israel, and that is the point of the Second Coming.
But I don't think this war with all the nations, declared on Israel, will be realized as a wake up call for the Second Coming. I think Ezekiel 39 was realized and missed by the church. Except for the part where Israel turns to God and are reminded of that verse. Obviously God has not stepped in yet and removed Israel's blindness. The Second Coming was implied but unlike Zechariah 14, not explicitly mentioned.
It seems plausible that every judgment pronounced on nations throughout the OT prophets not directly related to Babylon, Greece, or Rome, could be related to every conflict Israel has faced since 1948, if people did not spiritualize them all away. Every time a nation tries to take something from Israel, Israel seems to gain more in return than Israel looses. But Israel is not going to know it is God blessing them, until the Second Coming and blindness in part is removed. That is why the name of God is profaned or polluted, because Israel is not giving God the credit nor the glory. Not necessarily because other nations are missing the point that God has Israel's best interest at heart.
I would assume that those who think the church has replaced Israel, and that Israel will be destroyed along with all the other wicked, will miss out on the fact that God has not given up on Israel and still has plans to make Israel prosper as a physical nation, not just a body of spiritual people. For those who refuse to see time continue on earth for another thousand years, they will also find ways to only look at OT as being Israel, and only the church as being relevant now. I think that is why a spiritual point is made downplaying the actual hand of God on Israel, even though Israel has rejected their Messiah. Salvation is not really the issue nor redemption. There is no special standing for either Gentile nor Israel. Gentiles are not given special treatment above Israel, nor Israel above Gentiles when it comes to the Gospel and redemption.