Are you always so paranoid? Surely you're not ashamed of your church?The name of my church is Don't Submit To Personal Attack Questions.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Are you always so paranoid? Surely you're not ashamed of your church?The name of my church is Don't Submit To Personal Attack Questions.
Again, SDA and Mormons flat out acknowledge and celebrate the divinity of Christ.So, what is the name of your "church"? JW's, SDA's, Unitarians and Mormon?
Do they believe they themselves are gods?Again, SDA and Mormons flat out acknowledge and celebrate the divinity of Christ.
No.Do they believe they themselves are gods?
You miss the point. God the logos manifest as an angel first, then as a man.The problem with this is that an archangel cannot be God, and God cannot be an archangel. "The Angel of the LORD" is a very precise title for the pre-incarnate Word, who appeared as God to men (as it becomes very clear in Exodus 3) and demanded worship.
That’s LDS not SDA, who believe they can be exalted to godhood on their very own planet.Do they believe they themselves are gods?
That's what I thought too, but someone here denied it.That’s LDS not SDA, who believe they can be exalted to godhood on their very own planet.
I started my life as Catholic, educated in Catholic schools, and after receiving Christ and being born again at age 23 after having not been to church since leaving high school, I went back to the Catholic Church to attend mass. I told the priest there of my recent experience and he didn't want to know. He turned pale, his mouth curled up like he'd sucked a lemon, and turned away. I returned the following week wondering if maybe I had made a mistake, but no. The sense I felt the second time was that the congregation itself was dead, and the step by step ritual now no relation whatsoever to my recent discovery of a living loving caring Savior.I've been praying for some time and not got an answer yet. I am baptized and like to take the sacrament so I'll look for a church that does that. But for now I'm stuck in limbo. I feel the need to fellowship so for now I'll attend Catholic mass as it's near to where I live. But I think it's only a temporary fix.
That’s LDS not SDA, who believe they can be exalted to godhood on their very own planet.
Again, actual "Mormon" here.That's what I thought too, but someone here denied it.
I have read stuff related to that often. So where does this idea come from, do you know?The "own planet thing" isn't accurat
Like in the case for anti-SDA stuff, anti-Mormon stuff has these ideas that have just been in that group for 50+ years based off complete misconceptions and just get handed down over the years.I have read stuff related to that often. So where does this idea come from, do you know?
That is on the assumption that the archangel is a created angel. We as Adventists do not find in scripture any evidence that Michael, the archangel, is a created being. We do not reduce the deity or divinity of Christ by affirming His identity as chief of the angels. It is a natural title, Lord of hosts, quite befitting the Son of God, who is 'like God'.The problem with this is that an archangel cannot be God, and God cannot be an archangel. "The Angel of the LORD" is a very precise title for the pre-incarnate Word, who appeared as God to men (as it becomes very clear in Exodus 3) and demanded worship.
@Backlit , it is accurate to say that SDA believe that Christ took on the alias of Micheal before being born of Mary?That is on the assumption that the archangel is a created angel. We as Adventists do not find in scripture any evidence that Michael, the archangel, is a created being. We do not reduce the deity or divinity of Christ by affirming His identity as chief of the angels. It is a natural title, Lord of hosts, quite befitting the Son of God, who is 'like God'.
That said, Adventists are firm absolute believers in the divinity and deity of Jesus. Without apology, without understating. Nor do we nor are we willing to compromise that stand in any way, and our teaching regarding Michael doesn't do that.That is on the assumption that the archangel is a created angel. We as Adventists do not find in scripture any evidence that Michael, the archangel, is a created being. We do not reduce the deity or divinity of Christ by affirming His identity as chief of the angels. It is a natural title, Lord of hosts, quite befitting the Son of God, who is 'like God'.
I was mormon and I actually heard it in church, so if it isn't accurate then I was being taught false doctrine.I have read stuff related to that often. So where does this idea come from, do you know?
Misconceptions by Mormons themselves, or their enemies? What does the LDS church teach then regarding this inheriting or receiving ones own planet, what is the truth of that concept?Like in the case for anti-SDA stuff, anti-Mormon stuff has these ideas that have just been in that group for 50+ years based off complete misconceptions and just get handed down over the years.
Mmmm. I was told something similar by my wife's cousin who is Mormon. I just assumed it was a genuine belief among Mormons. Now I'm confused that Jane is saying it's wrong. I don't know who's wrong... Us or the Mormons themselves?I was mormon and I actually heard it in church, so if it isn't accurate then I was being taught false doctrine.
Can you tell me why not, without any assumptions? In other words, based on scripture alone.Michael cannot be Jesus!