- Jun 22, 2015
- 8,243
- 1,203
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
Since the Bible is one book with one author using different 'secretaries' over a long period of time, consulting other scripture reinforces what is being said. What did Jesus answer when he was tempted by the devil? "it is written"...the Bible was his backup. Each temptation was countered with a scripture.
Was Jesus tempted by a fallen angel? Who do you think satan is? A figment of Jesus' imagination?
Again you grasp clinging to Matthew 4 having only a silent OT with thousand of years without any knowledge of this fallen angel story. Why not embrace the true lessons of Ezekiel 28? Has something there impressed you? Maybe you felt the true inspiration of the Word over what was previously held?
We will get to the NT Jane but as I mentioned earlier, the OT is silent for now. The integrity of Ezekiel 28 has been returned to the hearers and who knows maybe you will be reluctant to make such claims upon it in the future. I will continue with thoughts here but the next Scripture we shall restore is Isaiah 14.
You keep saying that satan is not a fallen angel, so I want to know who it is that is addressed by that name in the scriptures? Who was it that tempted Eve in the garden?
Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more shrewd than any of the wild animals that the Lord God had made.
This is not enough Jane?
Who is it that is misleading the entire inhabited earth? (1 John 5:19)
The whole world Jane! What has power over the whole world? Surely you have read of it many times and seen it personified hundreds of times? (shaking my head in disbelief!) Hebrews 2:14
Who is it that goes into the abyss for the thousand years of Jesus reign? (Revelation 20:1-3) Who is it that goes into the "lake of fire" "reserved for the devil and his angels" to be forever destroyed? Can you answer me please? We know who you don't think he is.....so who is he?
In short he or she is whoever the context of that Scripture teaches - in Ezekiel 28 we learned the context was King of Tyre and Tyrus. If you take me to another section of Scripture we need to apply the same principles of exegesis you have seen in this consideration.
Here is an example for you to ponder:
1 Timothy 3:11 Likewise also their wives must be dignified, not slanderous, temperate, faithful in every respect. and good managers of their children and their own households.
The word slanderers there is the word diabolos and is in most cases translated Devil.
1. Why did the translators not assign Devils to that text?
2. Who is the context of this verse speaking to?
So here it is as it would normally be translated:
1 Timothy 3:11 Likewise also their wives must be dignified, not devils, temperate, faithful in every respect. and good managers of their children and their own households.
Lets assume, as you do, in painting everything you read with the fallen angel brush... that they did translate it this way above...what damage would you confirmation bias do to the text? A lot right! You and I both know what you would do in your mind and it would be wrong.
The truth Jane, is being a slanderer is a human fleshly trait and has nothing to do with your supernatural creature of darkness. But what does this do for your understanding of diabolos?
To be honest Jane - I could do this for ever and a day and still not get any acknowledgement from you. I need to press on with Isaiah 14 because removing fallen angel theology from the OT seriously weakens your false position on this subject AND in the process we restore the true meaning of the text which is most important to me.
Last edited: