Adam And Eve disobeyed, but does that mean it was impossible for them to be obedient? If Unfallen man can choose to be disobedient am I to reason that he can't choose to be obedient? Its like you're saying that God didn't want obedience from his creation, that God was asking for the impossible, because what I get from the warning God gave Adam is that God wanted obedience from him. Was God asking for the impossible, because I don't see anywhere in that warning about disobedience that he was saying but it's ok to be disobedient sometimes. Am I to understand that warning was meaningless, since as you are saying sin and death is part of God's plan.
When it comes to the subject of the elect I don't believe that has anything to do with Angles. The subject of the elect I believe is talking about humans being chosen from mankind. But those Angles who chose to follow Satan, what are you saying that they had the ability to choose but the other Angles that didn't follow him they didn't have the ability to choose. I don't think that's reasonable, plus all of God intelligent creatures I believe have free will. I don't think any of his intelligent creatures are programmed robots, but instead free moral agents having the ability of choice.
When it comes to the subject of what would have happened to Eve , I honestly don't know. Adam didn't call upon God when this happened. I know God would have handled it in a loving way within his standards of Justice. I know that you say Adam knew God and the way he handled the situation is the way God would have handled it, because Adam was trying to save Eve. I understand what you believe, I just disagree with it. I honestly don't believe God would ignore his own laws or encourage anyone to ignore his laws, such as the way Adam did.
I know that God knew when he gave the Mosaic law they couldn't obey it perfectly, which is why God gave them animal sacrifices and priests and a High Priest (Aaron) so that when they made a mistake and were repentant, went to the priests with the appropriate animal sacrifices God would forgive and the individual and Nation would have remained faithful to God. But God was dealing with imperfect people at this time. As long as an individual followed the instructions of the Mosaic law as best they could they were considered faithful. You see what I mean by following instructions, that's important to God, but Adam didn't follow his instructions. God wanted obedience concerning the forbidden fruit. You said Adam did what God would have done. Which means according to you those instructions about being obedient concerning the forbidden fruit were meaningless, even though God instructions were not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. I don't think so. And Just as there have been Angels, who were created perfect and remained perfect because they chose not to be unfaithful shows Adam and Eve had the same ability to choose to be faithful. The fact that they failed doesn't mean God created Adam and therefore mankind in such a way that it would be impossible for another sinless (Unfallen, perfect) man to live a life without sin, living a life of always being obedient, never disobedient always faithful and living by the Mosaic law perfectly. That man was Jesus Christ, God's only Begotten Son. He came to and proved that a sinless Unfallen perfect man can remain that way even though he was tempted in every way that we are right up to death. He was the appropriate ransom sacrifice, because what was lost was a perfect man and a perfect human society within the Lions of Adam. Jesus Christ ransom sacrifice buys back what Adam in his disobedience lost.
Jesus who was the last Adam, meaning he was a perfect man like Adam had the potential for fathering a perfect human race. Instead, however, he allowed God's enimies to put him to death so that he could adopt Adam's sinful descendents and make it possible for those exercising in him to receive everlasting life. The scriptures explains: "There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man, Jesus Christ, who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all." One day this planet will be filled with a perfect human society with nobody growing old, having no sickness, no wars. Jesus Christ and those who are resurrected to heaven with him will rule over mankind from heaven.
The warning God gave to Adam was not meaningless because it was true. And death was the result of disobedience. This shows you that a perfect creature created by God with a will could disobey and fall away from God. And if the possibility existed for Adam and Eve, it would equally have existed for all their children. What then? Do you think when Adam and Eve had produced children, which they would have, and they too would have been perfect, that none would ever disobey God? And if Adam and Eve had not fallen that day, what then? The possibility was always there for them to fall another day. And, as I have said before in another thread, if Adam and Eve were sinless and perfect, but fell, what guarantee do you have that you will not sin against God in Heaven? You don't. Yes, sin and death were very much part of the plan of God. Neither the Garden of Eden nor the Law were the end of what God is doing. They were simply a means working towards the end.
Concerning the Angels and their being elect, here is another Scripture you can disbelieve. (1 Tim. 5:21) "I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things...." No doubt the angels had a will. Because some willed to follow satan. The elect of the Angels are just like the elect of mankind. Chosen by God and therefore kept by God. For man it involved a plan of salvation that in the end would raise him to a higher order than the angels. For the Angels it involved insuring that they do not follow satan. You are correct in saying none of God's creatures are robots. But, here again, what guarantee do you have that we will not choose to sin in Heaven. Both the Angels and Man were sinless when they disobeyed?
Concerning Eve, of course God would not ignore His own laws. No where have I indicated that. You are reading that into what I say. But I am not saying that. All laws of God are a reflection of God Himself. And all laws of God reveal the inability of the creature to measure up to the Creator. It doesn't matter if that creature is sinless or sinful, the law reveals their weakness. You say God would have acted toward Eve in a loving and just way but you don't know what He would have done. That's a cop out answer. You know and can offer a suggestion. You just don't want to. Because the answer reveals a problem with your belief.
Concerning Christ coming as the Last Adam, you indicate that is proof that a man could be obedient to God. You forget there is a slight difference there. Jesus happened to be also God the Son. This is every indication that if God had destroyed Adam and Eve, as traitors as you like to say, and had made another pair, they too would eventually go the same way. In other words, why not just make another pair instead of going through this history of suffering and pain and the horrible death of Jesus Christ? You see? This Sacrifice of Christ was not a response to Adams sin. It was always part of God's plan as (1 Peter 1:18-20) says.
And, we are not adopted into the family of God. We are born. Something which was impossible for Adam and Eve in the Garden.
Stranger