Marvelloustime
Well-Known Member
Correct brother Amigo.It wasnt cause mary and joseph didnt have any other children .
You cant use this to try and justify what is not .
If mary was a perpetual virgin , Even luke or the other writers would have made that very evident .
Instead of saying joseph knew her not TILL AFTER the child was born .
IT would have made it very clear , HE never knew her for she was a perpetual virgin .
I mean if it had been so true and so needful to know , HOW come not one author
of those gospels ever said so . IF something is needed to be known , IT would have been made known .
Just like when JESUS said about mary magdelon . Her washing his feet and annointing him with oil
would be told as a memorial unto her . SO if mary was a perpetual virgin , DONT YA THINK
that Christ would have made some kind of mention of it , OR at least the other writers of the gosples .
THEY write and say HE KNEW her NOT TILL AFTER the child was born .
HAD she been truly a virgin forever , THEY would have said very clearly , HE never knew her
for mary was to remain a virgin forever . YET IT NEVER said that . AND yall huff and puff
as though its of dire necessity to teach it and believe it . IF it were , HOW COME not one
of the writers of the four gospels ever made any mention of it . HOW COME . Exactly .
IT says very clearly HE did not know her TILL AFTER . TAKE HEED TO THOSE TWO WORDS . TILL AFTER
never said HE never knew her for mary was a virgin forever . Exactly .
And here is the actual scripture.
“and knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.”
Matthew 1:25 KJV