To All,
You know, when people pick their screen names, it often provides some insight into their perspectives. Take "historyb" for example. At first glance it would appear that this individual may have some propensity for "history". And being that this person professes him/her self as a "christian", it would make sense that this person may have a strong background in Scriptural History. Unfortunately, most of the "history" accounted for, -- certainly in the Book of Daniel --, is commentator rubbish, and I suspect that "historyb" might not be up to a critical review of Scripture and World History (as documented by HISTORIANS), but certainly may be more familiar with the FALSE history as contorted by the commentators.
Bobby Jo
You know, when people pick their screen names, it often provides some insight into their perspectives. Take "historyb" for example. At first glance it would appear that this individual may have some propensity for "history". And being that this person professes him/her self as a "christian", it would make sense that this person may have a strong background in Scriptural History. Unfortunately, most of the "history" accounted for, -- certainly in the Book of Daniel --, is commentator rubbish, and I suspect that "historyb" might not be up to a critical review of Scripture and World History (as documented by HISTORIANS), but certainly may be more familiar with the FALSE history as contorted by the commentators.
Bobby Jo