Robert Gwin
Well-Known Member
Thanks Rob.
"... there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and the unjust."
Acts 24:15
I see the point you're making. The verse seems to say that there will be two resurrections based on the last part of the verse there. But it does say a resurrection. It seems that if the author wanted to refer to multiple events, he would say 'there shall be resurrections (plural) of the dead.'
I have the overwhelming desire to call you maam for some reason, are you by any chance a female? In speaking of the reward, Jesus said the last would be the first. We believe that the resurrection will begin shortly after the Kingdom comes, and logically it will be held gradually with those who died most recently being resurrected first, because of the many changes among God's people over time.
I also believe that Christians can be referred to as unjust/unrighteous. I am of the belief, based on many verses, that some Christians will be rejected by God after their resurrection. Matthew 7:22 is one indication of that to me.
If Christians have been judged unrighteous, they will be executed when Jesus returns.
We need to consider a couple things that come to mind. In Ecclesiastes 12:5-7, we are told that a person's spirit returns to God upon their death. If that is just a general spirit of physical body-animating life, and not THE Holy Spirit, as it seems to indicate, then is that the moment of judgment? Remember, there is no time in the spirit realm where God exists.
The spirit/breath that goes out upon death is life force. The dead is dead, unconscious of anything Ps 146:4; Ecc 9:5,6,10
The story of Lazarus seems to show that unbelievers may go straight to the Lake of Fire upon death. Whereas the believers are said to be sleeping in the dust of the earth. Awaiting their resurrection?
That story is just that, a story. It was a parable that represented a change in the ruling faction of God's people under a new covenant.
It's never made much sense to me that unbelievers would be raised physically from their graves only to be judged and punished. It makes more sense that it would be believers who are ashamed before God after they are resurrected. An atheist wouldn't be ashamed of anything. The guilty are only ever disappointed they got caught for their crimes, they have no shame; certainly not before a God they didn't believe in.
That is why we believe the unrighteous, were not righteous because of never having the opportunity to serve God.
One of the real kickers of this concept is whether someone embraces the Millennium doctrine or not. I do not. If one considers that doctrine legitimate, which scripture very much contradicts, then you can believe that the earth will remain long enough after Jesus' return to be capable of two resurrections 1,000 years apart. But if you see that scripture makes plain that the earth is destroyed upon Jesus' return, then there is no time for there to be a Second Resurrection a millennia later.
I do not understand your concept of two resurrections, unless you are referring to the first resurrection which has already happened shortly after Jesus received the crown, and the upcoming resurrection after Jesus returns and the Kingdom comes. They will not be 1k yrs apart.
One resurrection when Jesus returns, some to life and some to shame and damnation; then the earth is destroyed.
The earth will never be destroyed Gen. Ecc 1:4; Ps 104:5