CharismaticLady
Well-Known Member
thorn in my flesh
Do you have any idea what the real meaning of "thorn in the flesh" is? I don't think so. Surprise me if you know.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
thorn in my flesh
(No where does it say the blood of Jesus merely covers our sin.)
You are being condescending.Do you have any idea what the real meaning of "thorn in the flesh" is? I don't think so. Surprise me if you know.
It does say it...basically in Romans 4:7. It is not mere covering; but mighty forgiveness (and justification)!
The taking away of our sins is sanctification...the fulness of which is a second benefit (2 Corinthians 1:15).
You are being condescending.
What you have been taught is the lie that we will always sin, we will always be in the flesh, and we will never be free from sin until we reach heaven.
our powerful God who takes away our sin nature and replaces it with the divine nature.
Possibly you've been taught the lie that Jesus takes away our past, present and future sins. NO!!!
So answer the question. What does Paul mean by thorn in the flesh?
Justification is having your sins covered. Sanctification is having them taken away.No, it is justification, backed immediately by sanctification
You are also not my teacher. Paul would prohibit you from teaching any man.Do you remember pointing out my name is CharismaticLADY?
So answer the question. What does Paul mean by thorn in the flesh?
Nevertheless I do not believe that.
I believe that I can teach this better than you can (and have done so)...Commentary on Romans.
Actually, this one's true...Romans 4:8, Romans 8:38-39 (sins present and future will not separate us from the love of God) and Hebrews 9:12.
Since you were being condescending in the first place, I am not going to answer you. Because no matter what I say, you will say that it is wrong. That is the attitude that you are exhibiting.
Justification is having your sins covered. Sanctification is having them taken away.
Mine is scriptural.
false teachers twisting his teachings - something like what you do to them...
NO WHERE is a Christians sins merely covered.
If you want to convince anyone of anything you better back it up with Scripture.
Where does it say that sanctification is a process.
You are also not my teacher. Paul would prohibit you from teaching any man.
So is mine.
Thank you...I will pray for your salvation.
Yes, somewhere...in Romans 4:7.
Romans 4:7.
2 Corinthians 3:18.
Oh that's very good fruit!ROFL You haven't learned a thing. Go stand in the corner little boy.
I'm done trying to teach you anything. 1 Corinthians 14:38.
1 Timothy 2:11-15 cites the order of creation...as well as the fact that the woman was deceived and not the man...as the reasoning behind why Paul will not suffer a woman to teach or usurp authority over a man. Too bad he isn't here; because he would put you in your place.Galatians 3:27-29
27 For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
The only reason Paul forbid women speaking, or told to wait until they got home to ask their husbands was because women were illiterate. Only men could study the Torah. Also women were on one side of the room and men on the other. Women would have to raise their voice too loudly to ask their husband in the room. However, prophetesses were allowed to speak. There was no gender attached to Words from the Lord.
Even most men know this.
If being transformed into the image of Christ from glory to glory isn't sanctification, I don't know what is.2 Corinthians 3:18 mentions nothing about sanctification.
1 Timothy 2:11-15 cites the order of creation...as well as the fact that the woman was deceived and not the man...as the reasoning behind why Paul will not suffer a woman to teach or usurp authority over a man. Too bad he isn't here; because he would put you in your place.
For someone who doesn't have any sin, you certainly have a cheery attitude.
Paul says it as one with authority as an apostle; and it is a practice to be followed. He gives the order of creation and the fact that Eve was deceived rather than Adam as the reasoning behind his practice. Since the reasoning is based on something all the way back in Genesis, we ought to heed his teaching on the matter, even as something that has eternal value.Paul tells us when it is a command from the Lord, and when it is his opinion based on the culture and the times they are living.
1 Cor. 7:12 But to the rest I, not the Lord, say:
1 Timothy 2:
I desire therefore that the men pray everywhere, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting; 9 in like manner also, that the women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with propriety and moderation, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing, 10 but, which is proper for women professing godliness, with good works. 11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. 12 And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. 15 Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.
Timothy was Paul's student. These instructions were from Paul, not the Lord as a command.