Wrangler
Well-Known Member
The Alpha and Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the Ending, King of Kings, Lord of Lords, the Author and Finisher
All prophets speak for God. Doesn’t make them God.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The Alpha and Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the Ending, King of Kings, Lord of Lords, the Author and Finisher
correct. I was answering the other man there.
Look at the text carefully:We say God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah even though an angel actually did the deed. It's just that the deed was done at God's direction.
Except for Jesus, who is. Why not address what I said, and presented instead of not doing so? Why are you so reluctant to even address my evidences, and always hand wave it away? Is that how you address the remaining issues in life - ignore them?All prophets speak for God. Doesn’t make them God.
Can we look at this a moment?Sh'ma @ Deut 6:4
I am glad I am neither of those errors ('trinitarianism', 'modalism' (aka Sabellianism, etc)) for scripture does not teach either. I am glad that there are those who point out the errors of both, however, some go too far, and reject the truth in so doing (becoming 'Arian', "Unitarian' and the like) The scriptures teach that there are 3 Persons/Beings that all have existed eternally, being the heavenly eternal Trio (3 Persons/Beings that are not ever 1 Person/Being (being logically incoherent), nor 1 Person/Being masquerading as multiple Persons/Beings (I would call that devil possession if I saw a single person manifest 3 differing personalities).When trinitarians can't show a scripture of three separate persons make up one God, they switch to Modalism
Yes, but they would be holding to a theological error about the nature and Personality or Personhood of JEHOVAH elohiym. Ultimately they will need to let go their error. For the Holy Ghost is promised to lead them into "all truth".I’ve met many people with a down payment of the Spirit who think of God as 3 parts, but all one.
Except for Jesus, who is. Why not address what I said
I can grasp that taking the form of a servant means that one is not a servant. But I don’t think that helps your cause...Can you grasp that ‘taking the form of X, necessarily means one is not X?
Yes, but they would be holding to a theological error about the nature and Personality or Personhood of JEHOVAH elohiym. Ultimately they will need to let go their error. For the Holy Ghost is promised to lead them into "all truth".
The only reason he was mortal was by choice. By taking upon Himself human nature, deity became a mortal man.God's son, who was mortal and died,
The deity and/or divinity of Christ is not dependant upon a theological construct of man. Jesus was His Father's only begotten Son.... Who was sent from the Father's side to become our Savior through His taking upon Himself the fallen human nature of mankind. God's own declaration that"this is My Son" , Peters declaration "thou art the Son", is all the evidence one needs to Christs Divine nature. A literal Son of God has the same nature and the same attributes of God.the most significant proof that Jesus is not God is that the trinity is not in the Bible.
Until you try and define each.We are flesh, soul and spirit. There is nothing hard there.
We are adopted sons. Angels are created sons. Christ was begotten.Hi Backlit,
Just as food for thought or prayer... then if we are, or if we become sons of God would that be evidence that we have become gods or Gods?
What is Jesus praying for here?
"Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;
That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me." John 17:20-21
Is John 17 showing us Oneness or Duality or Trinitarian or Multiplicity?
And then...
"Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is." I John 3:2
...
Other translations:
- 1808: "and the Word was a god" – Thomas Belsham The New Testament
- 1822: "and the Word was a god" – The New Testament in Greek and English (A. Kneeland, 1822.)
- 1829: "and the Word was a god" – The Monotessaron;
- 1863: "and the Word was a god" – A Literal Translation of the New Testament (Herman Heinfetter [Pseudonym of Frederick Parker], 1863)
Benjamin Wilson was once a Baptist, becoming a Campbellite, and later forming another church, The Church Of God Of The Abrahamic Faith - Benjamin Wilson (biblical scholar) - Wikipedia or Church of God General Conference - Wikipedia1864: "and a god was the Word" – The Emphatic Diaglott by Benjamin Wilson, New York and London (left hand column interlinear reading)
- 1867: "In the beginning was the gospel preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God" – The Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible
Hugh went so far as to say that the crucifixion was an event in the life of Jesus that went wrong.[*]1955: "so the Word was divine" – The Authentic New Testament, by Hugh J. Schonfield, Aberdeen
The "Wuest" (Kenneth Wuest) 'translation' came from the Nestle's Aland text, which also rejected the TR, and picked up on the Westcott and Hort texts. - Kenneth Wuest - Wikipedia[*]1956: "In the beginning the Word was existing. And the Word was in fellowship with God the Father. And the Word was as to His essence absolute deity" – The Wuest Expanded Translation
A historical consideration of these men and their theology (they were not Arian, nor promoting Arianism in their translations] can be seen here - Germans, JW’s and John 1:1[*]1970, 1989: "...and what God was, the Word was" – The Revised English Bible 1975 "and a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word" – Das Evangelium nach Johnnes, by Siegfried Schulz, Göttingen, Germany
[*]1975: "and the Word was a god" – Das Evangelium nach Johannes (S. Schulz, 1975);
[*]1978: "and godlike sort was the Logos" – Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Johannes Schneider, Berlin
David Bently Hart is supposedly an 'Orthodox theologian' (Eastern Orthodoxy) and identifies with "'Christian Socialism and 'Demo[n]cratic Socialism''" (Jesuitism) and has taught at Loyola (Jesuit) College, MD, as well as Notre Dame (both Jesuit Roman Catholic Institutions). He was not Arian, though he taught 'trinitarianism', and thus his 'translation' would not deny Jesus as Deity. To utilize his 'translation' as such is disingenuous to his own erroneous theology. The guy is obviously a Jesuit masquerading as Orthodox.[*]2017: “In the origin there was the Logos, and the Logos was present with GOD, and the Logos was god;” - The New Testament: A Translation, by David Bentley Hart
Robert Young (Young's Literal), whose actual translation (not commentary) reads: "1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God". He was not an Arian.1885: "and the Word was a god" – Concise Commentary on The Holy Bible (R. Young, 1885)
Just trying to understand what you are saying... It's late and I wonder if I should even be involved in such a discussion? Take care old friend!We are adopted sons. Angels are created sons. Christ was begotten.
But being adopted affords mankind with unbelievable privileges. We can partake of the divine nature and become like Christ... In fact that is our calling... To be recreated in they image of God.
Rom_8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:False Alternative. Jesus was a man. There is only one God of flesh nature.
Not at all, as I never advocated for that heretical doctrine. You simply pulled out the strawman again. Therefore, since I never advocated for, I never need to look for any texts to support the heresy.Looks like ReChoired is having trouble in finding a single scripture that says 'three separate persons make up one God'.
I have been telling you that, but you keep misrepresenting my position, which is that there are Three Heavenly Eternal Persons/Beings, the Trio, which has the individuals - Person/Being of the Father, the Person/Being of the Son, and the Person/Being of the Holy Ghost/Spirit working together as a chord, family, team, sharing the same goal, a unified group of Persons/Beings [JEHOVAH (name) Elohiym (individuals of that family)] who are never one Person/Being.The trinity doctrine is not Christian
Where ever did I say there was? Feel free to read all my posts in this thread, or even in this forum. You will not find even a single place. I do not advocate your strawman, therefore I never need to look for texts to defend that heresy., therefore, you will not find the phrase in any Bible.
Following your logic, Jesus was not a servant then? ("the form of a servant" which parallels "the form of God")? which again would make Him God/Deity. Damned if you do, damned if you don't, as the old saying goes. I would hate to be in your position.Can you grasp that ‘taking the form of X, necessarily means one is not X?
Asserted? Sure, by scripture. I simply "Amen'ed" it.Because you make unfounded assertions. Why do you except Jesus? Just assert it.