2. Language Usage -
no qualifier for the 12 Apostles. As explained in post #38, there is no qualifier of
replacement Apostles.
3. Definition - The 3 Stooges (definite article,
THE). Like point 1, when we refer to
THE 12 Apostles, it means the
original 12 that Jesus picked - no matter how bad one of them acted. "The" 3 stooges are Moe, Larry and Curly. Any talk of a
replacement Stooge, Shemp, is not what is meant by the phrase. Same with the Apostles.
- Rationalizations that THE 12 Apostles refer to some replacement Apostles and some of the Apostles selected by Jesus does not hold up to scrutiny. From Apostle - Wikipedia, In Christianity, the term was used in the New Testament for Jesus' Twelve Apostles, the Apostles that Jesus selected.
Please remember that “the twelve” was the number, not the individuals. The choosing of Matthias to replace Judas was by the casting of lots, which was left to God to decide who would fill Judas’ position.
An apostle is literally “one sent forth” which is why Paul could call Jesus an “apostle”. (Heb 3:1)
Wiki is not your best source of information on this.
At 2 Cor 11:5 Paul makes mention of “superfine” or “superlative apostles”......
“For I consider that I have not proved inferior to your superfine apostles in a single thing.”
2 Cor 12:11...
“I have become unreasonable. You compelled me to, for I ought to have been recommended by you. For I did not prove to be inferior to your superfine apostles in a single thing, even if I am nothing.”
Paul was defending himself because these “apostles” were trying to undermine his authority and his teachings. Paul’s choosing was unique....no other apostle was given such a specific ministry and no other apostle had the education that Paul had, which would be used by Jesus to preach to the learned ones of the Gentiles. We see this in his masterful speech to the “men of Athens”. Humble fishermen would have been laughed out of the place.
He was also used to write more scripture that the other apostles. Interestingly, out of the 12, only Matthew, John and Peter wrote NT books. That doesn’t mean that the others did not carry out an equal ministry, it just means that their writings, if there were any, did not make it into the canon.
Paul was forced to boast about his apostleship and the hardships he had faced in carrying out his ministry....
2 Cor 11:23...
“Are they ministers of Christ? I reply like a madman, I am more outstandingly one: I have done more work, been imprisoned more often, suffered countless beatings, and experienced many near-deaths.” ( see Paul’s full defence. 2 Cor 11:23-30)
He uses a somewhat sarcastic designation to describe those arrogant men who apparently saw themselves as superior to the apostles whom Jesus himself had appointed. Paul calls them “false apostles” because they were actually ministers of Satan. (2 Cor 11:13-15) They taught their own version of the good news about Christ. (2 Cor 11:3-4) They also belittled and slandered Paul, challenging his God-given authority as an apostle.
John 21:25....
“There are also, in fact, many other things that Jesus did, which if ever they were written in full detail, I suppose the world itself could not contain the scrolls written.”
Can we imagine the size of the Bible if everything was recorded.....God chose what would be beneficial and educational.
You seem to misunderstand the word “apostle”....