Rev 21:14 Names of 12 Apostles on the Foundations?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Do the names of the 12 Apostles written on the foundation in Rev 21:14 include Judas?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • No

    Votes: 7 77.8%

  • Total voters
    9
  • Poll closed .

1stCenturyLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
5,638
2,312
113
77
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well,if you go out and talk some more people into casting lots before the Lord,then you might just chose apostle number twelve.The Lord probably won't say anything about it just like that day.

I think I will put my money on the horse that Christ chose.

All apostles are from Jesus, so that isn't anything to be pompous about. That includes Mathias, Paul, Barnabas and Apollos, plus who knows how many more. Maybe even today seeing as the Church is far from unity of the faith.

Ephesians 4:
And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ
 

shilohsfoal

Member
Dec 26, 2010
860
47
28
61
North Carolina
All apostles are from Jesus, so that isn't anything to be pompous about. That includes Mathias, Paul, Barnabas and Apollos, plus who knows how many more. Maybe even today seeing as the Church is far from unity of the faith.

Ephesians 4:
And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ
Jesus didn't chose Mathias.

Jesus chose Paul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wrangler

Tommy Cool

Active Member
Jul 17, 2022
320
207
43
HIGHLAND,MI
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I've always thought that "casting lots" was a pagan thing seeing as the Roman soldiers cast lots for the robe of Jesus, but just now I looked up "cast lots" and a lot of scriptures came up in the Old Testament about casting lots before the Lord! So I guess Mathias is one of the official 12.

Can't say as I like it seeing as we don't hear a peep out of him and it has been my mindset for my whole life, but for the Lord's sake that is the last bad thing I'll say against him being an apostle! I will accept Matthias as being an apostle and his name being on one of the 12 layers.
You almost wrote my script on that. ...I had the same feelings at discovery.
 

Tommy Cool

Active Member
Jul 17, 2022
320
207
43
HIGHLAND,MI
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I think Christ has to chose an apostle.I don't believe you can just throw dice or lots and let the dice decide.
When you consider that it was about 35+ years after Pentecost when Luke received the revelation from Jesus Christ to write the book of Acts… One might consider that if He (Jesus) did not want that record in there … it may have been left out …in order to make room for Paul……Just say’n ….It's something to consider ….It’s pure speculation, which is something I rarely do.

Quite honestly, we don’t know …we are limited to the Truth provided in the Word …

You can be sure that the things which Paul accomplished will not go unnoticed in Gods eyes. Possibly Paul will be Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the 12 in New Jerusalem …............................and that concludes my speculation.
 

1stCenturyLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
5,638
2,312
113
77
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
When you consider that it was about 35+ years after Pentecost when Luke received the revelation from Jesus Christ to write the book of Acts… One might consider that if He (Jesus) did not want that record in there … it may have been left out …in order to make room for Paul……Just say’n ….It's something to consider ….It’s pure speculation, which is something I rarely do.

Quite honestly, we don’t know …we are limited to the Truth provided in the Word …

You can be sure that the things which Paul accomplished will not go unnoticed in Gods eyes. Possibly Paul will be Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the 12 in New Jerusalem …............................and that concludes my speculation.
What is also interesting is the Paul is the one who told Luke the history. Paul's personality is one of sort of competing with the other apostles and Luke would have worded it in the light of an error if it should have been Paul as the 12th. Just an observation...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wrangler

1stCenturyLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
5,638
2,312
113
77
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
But if you add in these 3, it does not fit with the 12 referenced in the Revelation verse. How do you reconcile that?
The twelve in Revelation have Matthias as the 12th, I believe. I always thought it would have been Paul because Jesus, Himself, chose him in a vision. But casting lots before the Lord was legal before the Day of Pentecost. Also, Matthias knew Jesus before he died. Paul didn't.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,603
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The twelve in Revelation have Matthias as the 12th, I believe. I always thought it would have been Paul because Jesus, Himself, chose him in a vision. But casting lots before the Lord was legal before the Day of Pentecost. Also, Matthias knew Jesus before he died. Paul didn't.
So, what is your rational for including Matthias but excluding Paul, Barnabas and Apollos? And I suppose more significantly, what is your rational for not including Judas?
 

1stCenturyLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
5,638
2,312
113
77
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So, what is your rational for including Matthias but excluding Paul, Barnabas and Apollos? And I suppose more significantly, what is your rational for not including Judas?

We have missionaries don't we? Those are apostles. There are more apostles than just the first 12, but it was important to have at least the first 12 to start off the Church, just like the 12 tribes of Israel, even though there were more (Joseph),
 

shilohsfoal

Member
Dec 26, 2010
860
47
28
61
North Carolina
The twelve in Revelation have Matthias as the 12th, I believe. I always thought it would have been Paul because Jesus, Himself, chose him in a vision. But casting lots before the Lord was legal before the Day of Pentecost. Also, Matthias knew Jesus before he died. Paul didn't.
If Jesus wanted Mathias to be an apostle,he had plenty of time to appoint him as such.Insted,Jesus did not appoint Mathias as an apostle .
According to scripture,Jesus chose 13 apostles in all including Judas. .I have not seen any other apostles being appointed by Christ .
 

1stCenturyLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
5,638
2,312
113
77
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If Jesus wanted Mathias to be an apostle,he had plenty of time to appoint him as such.Insted,Jesus did not appoint Mathias as an apostle .
According to scripture,Jesus chose 13 apostles in all including Judas. .I have not seen any other apostles being appointed by Christ .
I understand what you are saying, and I agreed for as long as I've been alive. But that was because I always considered casting lots as pagan. Now that I know that it is not, I'm not as sure. All I can do is NOT bad mouth Mathias any longer. I guess I'll just wait and read the layers for myself. You can stand beside me and we can read it together. Hey?
 

shilohsfoal

Member
Dec 26, 2010
860
47
28
61
North Carolina
I understand what you are saying, and I agreed for as long as I've been alive. But that was because I always considered casting lots as pagan. Now that I know that it is not, I'm not as sure. All I can do is NOT bad mouth Mathias any longer. I guess I'll just wait and read the layers for myself. You can stand beside me and we can read it together. Hey?
It wouldn't be bad mouthing Mathias because he was not chosen to be an apostle.I myself have not been chosen to be an apostle and I'm not offended by anyone who doesn't believe I am.
;)

What I never really understood was why Peter felt that they should chose an apostle for Jesus in the first place.Jesus had an entire world full of people to chose from but Peter decided to limit the choice to just a couple.Peter also chose that the apostle should have been chosen that day when Jesus had all the time he wanted to chose the 12th.If Peter was moved by the spirit to chose the 12th apostle ,then that would be one thing,but scripture doesn't say he was.That just makes no sense to me .
 

1stCenturyLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
5,638
2,312
113
77
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It wouldn't be bad mouthing Mathias because he was not chosen to be an apostle.I myself have not been chosen to be an apostle and I'm not offended by anyone who doesn't believe I am.
;)

What I never really understood was why Peter felt that they should chose an apostle for Jesus in the first place.Jesus had an entire world full of people to chose from but Peter decided to limit the choice to just a couple.Peter also chose that the apostle should have been chosen that day when Jesus had all the time he wanted to chose the 12th.If Peter was moved by the spirit to chose the 12th apostle ,then that would be one thing,but scripture doesn't say he was.That just makes no sense to me .

Ya, it sure is a mystery. Why didn't Luke make it more clear.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,603
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ya, it sure is a mystery. Why didn't Luke make it more clear.
I think Luke did make it clear. It’s just that today we tend to complicate the simple.

The 3 stooges are Moe, Larry and Curly. Any talk of a replacement Stooge, Shemp, is not what is meant by the phrase. Same with the Apostles.
 

1stCenturyLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2018
5,638
2,312
113
77
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I think Luke did make it clear. It’s just that today we tend to complicate the simple.

The 3 stooges are Moe, Larry and Curly. Any talk of a replacement Stooge, Shemp, is not what is meant by the phrase. Same with the Apostles.

There are good arguments for both Matthias and Paul. They are both apostles along with Barnabas and probably Apollos. If it is something I need to know, I'm sure God will tell me. If not, I'll just wait and read it on the layers.
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
7,127
3,918
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Right. The verse has no qualifier, like replacement Apostle.
Matthias is named as the apostle who replaced Judas....(Acts 1:15-26)
Also in v12, it says the names of the tribes of Israel will be written on the gates to New Jerusalem. Those who wanted to kill their brother and actually sold him into slavery are not excluded. What would it say about God's grace is only those through which his story unfolded WHO WERE PERFECT were honored in eternity?
I hope you remember that the brothers who sold Joseph into slavery were repentant and made peace with their brother who told them that it was God who sent him ahead of them to preserve his nation alive until Messiah came.

Judas was guilty of the unforgivable sin....he had participated in the works of the holy spirit and yet betrayed his Master for money.
He was not forgivable and he knew it, doing away with himself in that knowledge.
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
7,127
3,918
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
There are good arguments for both Matthias and Paul. They are both apostles along with Barnabas and probably Apollos. If it is something I need to know, I'm sure God will tell me. If not, I'll just wait and read it on the layers.
Paul was called an "apostle to the nations", and specially chosen by Jesus for his special ministry.....but he was never named as one of the twelve.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,603
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There are good arguments for both Matthias and Paul.

They are certainly insufficient argument for Matthias and Paul due to the fact that the math does not add up. The Scripture verse explicitly says 12 Apostles. So, if you subtract Judas and add Matthias and Paul, you end up with 13.

Matthias is named as the apostle who replaced Judas....(Acts 1:15-26)
True but beside the point. The point is the text does not have the qualifier replacement Apostle(s).

Judas was guilty of the unforgivable sin.
Hmmm. I don't know if that is true and even if it is true, I don't see how it is relevant. Both the Apostle Judas and the brothers of Joseph were guilty of betrayal. When you add the but they were repentant, you are adding a qualifier to the text.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,603
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I finally voted "yes" for the following 6 reasons.

1. Language Usage - no qualifier for the Tribes of Israel. We don't rationalize for v12 Joseph got a double share and his son's got land grants, therefore we arbitrarily exclude the lead brother who betrayed him and add Joseph's son. When we refer to the 12 Tribes of Israel, it means the 12 sons of Jacob - no matter how bad they acted.

2. Language Usage - no qualifier for the 12 Apostles. As explained in post #38, there is no qualifier of replacement Apostles.

3. Definition - The 3 Stooges (
definite article, THE). Like point 1, when we refer to THE 12 Apostles, it means the original 12 that Jesus picked - no matter how bad one of them acted. "The" 3 stooges are Moe, Larry and Curly. Any talk of a replacement Stooge, Shemp, is not what is meant by the phrase. Same with the Apostles.
  • Rationalizations that THE 12 Apostles refer to some replacement Apostles and some of the Apostles selected by Jesus does not hold up to scrutiny. From Apostle - Wikipedia, In Christianity, the term was used in the New Testament for Jesus' Twelve Apostles, the Apostles that Jesus selected.
  • When we refer to THE 1st POTUS, we mean under the current form of government. We don't go back to the Articles of Confederation and mean John Hanson, who was 'president of the Congress' under the Articles of Confederation.
4. Logic - Math Adding Up. Again, as explained in post #38, the math does not add up if you subtract Judas but add Matthias, Barnabas and Paul. And there is no basis to add one but not the 3.

5. Theology - God's Ability to Communicate (Power & Knowledge). If God meant to exclude Judas in v14, he would have said so. Many times we look for what is there but fail to grasp the implications of what is missing in text. The idea that God meant to exclude Judas but failed to say so - which puts the burden on us to read into the text what we want - is a bit presumptuous.

6. Theology - God's Grace. The most significant reason is what would it say about God's grace if only those through which his story unfolded WHO WERE PERFECT were honored in eternity and by eternal life?
  • While the JW oppose celebrating people's birthday as a form of worship, was does it say about the 12 tribes and 12 Apostles names being written on the gates and foundation of New Jerusalem for all eternity? I would not say it implies worship but high honor.
  • v12 and v14 represent high honors to these 24 men in God's story. Aren't we all honored by God's grace even though we fall short of the glory of God?
  • From Judas Iscariot - Wikipedia, Calvin writes "surely in Judas' betrayal, it will be no more right, because God himself willed that his son be delivered up and delivered him up to death, to ascribe the guilt of the crime to God than to transfer the credit for redemption to Judas."
  • It was said that Judas committed the unforgivable sin. These are lack of forgiveness of others and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. There is no evidence he committed either of these sins (although he certainly did not forgive himself). And in Scripture, these is no evidence he was damned to the Lake of Fire.
In conclusion, while our reflex is to exclude Judas, upon inspection, there is no reason to do so and at least 6 reasons to include Judas.
 

Robert Gwin

Well-Known Member
Mar 19, 2021
6,888
1,591
113
70
Central Il
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Right. The verse has no qualifier, like replacement Apostle.

Also in v12, it says the names of the tribes of Israel will be written on the gates to New Jerusalem. Those who wanted to kill their brother and actually sold him into slavery are not excluded. What would it say about God's grace is only those through which his story unfolded WHO WERE PERFECT were honored in eternity?
I am sorry Wrangler, I do not understand your question sir.