UppsalaDragby
New Member
- Feb 6, 2012
- 543
- 40
- 0
Well he could have, yes, but ... why would Jesus have to say something concerning a fact that was not only obvious at the time, but which would also contradict scripture?The Barrd said:When the Jews criticized Jesus for healing on the Sabbath, He told them that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. He could just as easily have said that the Sabbath was made for the Jews, and not the Jews for the Sabbath, but that is not what He said.
For us today, in hindsight - knowing that gentiles would be ingrafted into Israel, it might have seemed obvious to do so, but Jesus was addressing people that already understood that the sabbath was given to the Jews. So not only was such a clarification not necessary, you also need to bear in mind that the sabbath was not only given to the Jews to remind them of the creation week. It was also given to remind them that they were slaves in Egypt:
"Remember that you were slaves in Egypt, and that I, the Lord your God, rescued you by my great power and strength. That is why I command you to observe the Sabbath." (Deut 5:15)
Even though I think there is a figurative connotation here, it is obvious that most of the rest of mankind had never set their foot into Egypt.
Now as I pointed out, the "escape from Egypt" was most likely figurative, representing our escape from bondage to sin. We were once "slaves to sin", but through faith in the new creation and by follwing the Spirit, we have been set free from our bondage. Does that mean that we never sin? No, we are still on a journey to the promised land - which in that analogy would represent the perfection of the Saints at the end of time. All of this ties together with the real sabbath rest, not the Mosaic shadow.
The word "man" used in this verse can be used similarly to the way we use it in English. It does not necessarily mean the entire human race, but rather can simply apply to "human beings". If I went to finland and noticed that the all had the habit of eathing cans of cat food I don't think I would tell them that cat food was not made for Islanders. I would say that cat food was not made for human consumption. (A bad analogy, I know..)He said that it was made for man. Now, I don't know about you, but I am a member of the race known as "man"...therefore the Sabbath was made for me.
Stoning has nothing to do with the reason I don't think we are under the obligation to observe the Mosaic sabbath. You seem to be trying to guess, instead of just asking me. No, the reason has to do with what scripture tells us - that we are no longer under the Old Covenant - with or without stoning.I think the problem is that you are associating the Sabbath today with the Sabbath of the Old Testament. This is no longer the Sabbath where you get stoned to death if you are caught picking up sticks.
Which is perfectly true. It is also lawful to do good on the other days too, is it not? Again, you are reading too much into this verse. Jesus was simplyl responding to a certain group of poeple in defence of the actions of his disciples during that particular day. He was not making any statement about Christians being bound to keep the Mosaic sabbath.The Lord of the Sabbath (Who is Jesus) has declared that it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath day.
Firstly, I don't have any issue with people resting on the sabbath... or any other day of the week for that matter. I have an issue when people introduce doctrines that disagree with what scripture says. And what does scripture say? It says:We live in an era where we are surrounded by labor saving devices. There should be no problem at all in preparing for a day of rest.
I honestly do not see what all the screaming is about.
1. "Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ."
2. "One man considers one day more sacred than another; another man considers every day alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind." (Rom 14:5).
Secondly, I am not screaming. I just think it is important that our doctrines are sound. That is an important part of "contending for the gospel". I see it as being of utmost importance that what is being taught is not based on any human theories, that it does not add to scripture, and that it harmonizes with all of scripture.