Was Phoebe not a Deaconess?
Romans 16:1 in the NIV reads, “I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a
deacon of the church in Cenchreae.”
Did not Priscilla teach Apollos?
Galatians 3:28
"There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there
male and female,
for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
What about a believing wife married to an unbelieving husband? Can she not, if he is open to the Word be taught by her?
Proverbs 1:8
"Listen, my son, to your father's instruction and
do not forsake your mother's teaching."
People really don't truly read what I communicate. I never said at any time that women couldn't teach or preach to people about God and his kingdom. I said that from what I've read in the scriptures when Paul was saying he didn't allow women to teach he was talking about not allowing women to have positions of authority in the church.
The woman known as Phoebe, some Bible translations say she was a Deaconess other Bibles use the word minister.
This raises the question as to the sense in which the term
di·aʹko·nos (minister) is here used. Some translators view the term in an official sense and hence render it “deaconess” (
RS, JB). But the Scriptures make no provision for female ministerial servants. Goodspeed’s translation views the term in a general sense and translates it “helper.” However, Paul’s reference is evidently to something having to do with the spreading of the good news, the Christian ministry, and he was speaking of Phoebe as a female minister who was associated with the congregation in Cenchreae.—Compare
Ac 2:17, 18.
Priscilla was the wife of Aquila, with whom she is always mentioned.The two showed fine Christian works and hospitality not only to individuals but also to the congregation by having congregation meetings in their home in both Rome and Ephesus.
Because of Emperor Claudius’ decree, Aquila and his wife left Rome and went to Corinth in about 50 C.E. Not long after their arrival Paul joined them in tentmaking. (
Ac 18:2, 3) They traveled on with Paul to Ephesus, remained there for a time, and were instrumental in ‘expounding the way of God more correctly’ to the eloquent Apollos. Notice that Apollos was already very elegantly taught the scriptures just not as accurately as should be, which both Aquila and his wife Priscilla corrected. Priscilla wasn't acting as any kind of person of authority.(
Ac 18:18, 19, 24-28; 1Co 16:19) The scriptures show that Priscilla was alays with her husband and other men such as Paul. Nowhere in the scriptures is it showing Priscilla having a position of authority in the congregation. As I said and continue to say nothing is ever said that women can't preach and teach people about God and his kingdom.
Galatians 3: 28 you are taking out of context to try to prove your point which I'll never agree with.
Proverbs 1:8 is talking about a mother teaching her children. Of course she's teaching her children, the scriptures have never spoken out against that, but that doesn't mean she had a position of authority in the congregation.
When it comes to wives with unbelieving husbands here are some scriptures that may help:
You wives, be in subjection to your own husbands, in order that, if any are not obedient to the word, they may be won without a word through the conduct of their wives.”—
1 Pet. 3:1.
In like manner, you wives, be in subjection to your own husbands, in order that, if any are not obedient to the word, they may be won without a word through the conduct of their wives, because of having been eyewitnesses of your chaste conduct together with deep respect. And do not let your adornment be that of the external braiding of the hair and of the putting on of gold ornaments or the wearing of outer garments, but let it be the secret person of the heart in the incorruptible apparel of the quiet and mild spirit, which is of great value in the eyes of God.”—
These scriptures don't mean the wife can say anything about God and his kingdom. They should however be gracious when speaking to them and if they don't respond positively to what the believing wives says the wife should always be submissive to her husband who is her head.