Illuminator
Well-Known Member
Opponents of the Church often attempt to discredit Catholicism by attempting to show similarities between it and the beliefs or practices of ancient paganism. This fallacy is frequently committed by Fundamentalists against Catholics, by Seventh-day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, and others against both Protestants and Catholics, and by atheists and skeptics against both Christians and Jews...Not if the Catholic faith is that of Jesus for the common salvation of Jude 3: Jesus is Lord and Saviour, the begotten Son of the Father, and by Him only can any come to the Father. Not by Him and His 'Mother' Mary.
It was only when the Pontifex Maximus and the 'Pope' of Rome set about intermingling 'sacred' traditions' of old Roman Vesta with Christian faith in Christ, that the confusing paganism entered into official Christian religion.
They did so when Theodosius declared Christianity to be the Imperial religion. Up to that time since Constantine, they had been cohabiting of sorts and tolerating one another in Rome.
The Christian 'religion' finally won out, and so the Pope took over all state religion, but plainly did not leave behind the Pontifex Maximus and old Roman Vesta with Her 'Sacred fire'.
The 'Sacred traditions' thus began to piggy-back Christianity and intermix with Scripture of Christ.
It's a supreme example of not allowing the defeated enemy to be utterly done away with. The children of Israel did the same in the Promised land, and so defiled themselves with the pagans of the land, by not utterly destroying them as the Lord commanded.
Protestantism therefore is simply a protest of Christians against the assimilation of Roman paganism into the Common faith of Christ.
Catholics worshipping Christ in the Catholic church are Christians worshipping the same Christ in the churches of Christ.
Catholics who hold to 'sacred traditions' of Vest-Mary alongside and equal to Christ of Scripture, are doubleminded in the faith, being influenced by an old paganism they know not of.
...The pagan influence fallacy has not gone away in the twentieth century, but newer archaeology and more mature scholarship have diminished its influence. Yet there are still many committing it. In Protestant circles, numerous works have continued to popularize the claims of Alexander Hislop, most notably the comic books of Jack Chick and the book Babylon Mystery Religion by the young Ralph Woodrow (later Woodrow realized its flaws and wrote The Babylon Connection? repudiating it and refuting Hislop). Other Christian and quasi-Christian sects have continued to charge mainstream Christianity with paganism, and many atheists have continued to repeat—unquestioned—the charges of paganism leveled by their forebears.
Whenever one encounters a proposed example of pagan influence, one should demand that its existence be properly documented, not just asserted. The danger of accepting an inaccurate claim is too great. The amount of misinformation in this area is great enough that it is advisable never to accept a reported parallel as true unless it can be demonstrated from primary source documents or through reliable, scholarly secondary sources. @robert derrick never does this.
Is Catholicism Pagan?