You are welcome.
There is such a thing as a "cafeteria" Catholic that do not believe everything about Catholicism and the Catholic Catechism.
There are some practices that are outright against scripture.
Matthew 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. 10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
I am aware of the reference to Paul use of the term father to himself but I do not believe he was using that to infer he was being called "father", but on how he felt responsible to the converted flock.
Peter in his epistle mentioned Paul and he did not address him as Father Paul, but as "brother Paul" and Paul did not address Peter in Galatians 2:11 as "father" Peter either.
2 Peter 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
Galatians 2:11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
So just because CC uses Paul's reference for an excuse for why Catholics call them "fathers", Jesus plainly spoke against it and the lack of such titles to the disciples in the epistles shows the CC wanting for doing that practice.
It certainly has its use to making slaves to the CC which I'd say is not the same thing as being a slave to Christ. I thank you for sharing, but I am asking you to take a step back and look at the big picture here on what is going on around us and even down thru history for His discernment.
Pope Clement 1 had written an epistle to the Corinthians accusing them of jealousy for not giving a portion from their collection to the collectors from Rome that he had sent. That was the beginning of covetousness by the CC from Rome for how that paying tribute to the overhead began. Hardly a practice that Paul nor Peter started, mind you. What Paul had order was that portion be set aside for the support of missionaries in the field; not for paying tribute to the church of St. Peter or even to Peter himself since CC claims him as the first Pope.
How do you apply the Pope's announcement today for everyone not to convert any one?
What about the report of a few Catholic priests testifying to Satanists in the Vatican? Hardly sounds like a church that the gates of hell will not prevail against. It does show why Jesus had to rebuke Satan out of Peter because Peter wasn't the rock Jesus was building His Church on but Himself being the chief cornerstone.
Matthew 16:22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. 23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men. 24 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
As opposing the doctrine of the infallible Pope, here is a Catholic Talk Show reporting the 7 worst Popes in Catholic history.
Now I know you are indoctrinated into the CC, and maybe all you can see is that indoctrination, but does reality really support such indoctrination?