You teach that Mary has her feet on Joseph and Rachel, and has the 12 sons of Jacob on her head.Translation:
"Duhhhh, I can't answer you until I take my foot out of my mouth."
What is she doin' with them folks, Catholic?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You teach that Mary has her feet on Joseph and Rachel, and has the 12 sons of Jacob on her head.Translation:
"Duhhhh, I can't answer you until I take my foot out of my mouth."
Which “perversion” of which Pope contradicts the Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility?
How does the “perversion” of that Pope contradict the Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility?
Ummmm, talk about Scriptural acrobatics . . .
You keep dancing around the fact that Paul is calling HIMSELF "Father" to the Corinthians. You are also avoiding the fact that BOTH Jesus AND Stephen refer to Abraham as "Father". Same goes for Paul regarding Isaac.
This is nothing but a pathetic semantic dodge because you fail to understand why Jesus made His comments in Matt. 23:8-9 in the first place.
Secondly - "Pope" is not even an official title of the Bishop of Rome - but merely a term of endearment that simply means "Papa", so your argument is dead on arrival . . .
… an excellent example of the fallacy of the false alternative.Either you adhere to sola scriptura or Popa unscriptura.
Pick one.
What is the Word of God?Do you still ask the Lord for wisdom for your personal time in studying in the Word or not?
I see. You choose Popa Unscriptura.… an excellent example of the fallacy of the false alternative.
What is the Word of God?
I would never do that bevause that would be necromancy, Einstein.Next time you pray to Mary, ask her how Jacob and Rachel and their 12 kids are doing for me, okay?
It is the Holy Spirit - not the Pope, who protects the Church from teaching error.The 7 Popes that were living in sin. How can they as spiritual leaders be considered infallible by what they teach if they were living in sin?
Much cause for doubt there because of what scripture says.
1 John 1:3 That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ. 4 And these things write we unto you, that your joy may be full. 5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. 6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: 7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
I know you guys mean that only what he teaches is where he is infallible, BUT I am talking about the spiritual state of that Pope while living in sin. How can he teach without error when he is living in unrepentant error at that time when he is teaching?
That is as stupid as saying that YOU practice "Dopa Moronica" - but I would never say such a thing . . .I see. You choose Popa Unscriptura.
I would never do that bevause that would be necromancy, Einstein.
Do your homework . . .
No, I practice sola scriptura, not Mary worshipa and commentaria as the RCC doesThat is as stupid as saying that YOU practice "Dopa Moronica" - but I would never say such a thing . . .
Just curious.I would never do that bevause that would be necromancy, Einstein.
Do your homework . . .
The only thing that is evident by your posts is your total ignorance of all things Biblical or Catholic.No, I practice sola scriptura, not Mary worshipa and commentaria as the RCC does
Scripture I knowa, but Catholic I know nota. I quote the Bible, while Catholics quote Mary and saint Beelzebub, etc.The only thing that is evident by your posts is your total ignorance of all things Biblical or Catholic.
It is the Holy Spirit - not the Pope, who protects the Church from teaching error.
And God uses WHOMEVER He desires to do His will.
Remember Pharoah??
Caiaphas??
Pontius Pilate??
Where did I ever make this claim??So are you against praying to Mary? Do you tell other Catholics to stop doing that or am I misunderstanding you here?
You can't say that Mary cannot answer in that way when some Catholics testify to Mary speaking to people. And if Mary can speak to people, then by their reasoning, she can answer prayers. How can the evil appearance of "necromancy" be avoided?
This video below is about seeing what they believe was the virgin Mary, but would you remind them of this?
2 Corinthians 11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
The term antichrist as applied in scripture means " instead of Christ " or to be more precise "instead of the Son" rather than how the world applies "anti" to mean as against something. Anything taking the place of Christ where the focus should be on the Son in coming to God the Father by, is the antichrist.
So is this necromancy here to invoke a spirit to come believing that to be the "virgin Mary". I am sure they are not just standing around waiting for that light to come but praying for that to happen.
Wrong.God can do that without the Holy Spirit being involved. God can use Satan. Surely you can't say he has the Holy Spirit for God to use him.
You are citing examples of people that did not have the Holy Spirit to make your case?
I ask you, how come God did not pick a better Pope since there were many "good" Popes?
And why weren't the bad Popes removed by a "better & more qualified" Pope?
Where did I ever make this claim??
Are you capable of posting anything without lying??
You've gotten everything wrong so far.Scripture I knowa, but Catholic I know nota. I quote the Bible, while Catholics quote Mary and saint Beelzebub, etc.