B
brakelite
Guest
Yeah, I get that. I was just arguing from strangers perspective. Slavery in the South was predicated on the assumption that God approved of the subjugation of the black folk, based I suspect on the very same assumptions that stranger is making regarding the curse upon Ham and his descendants.I have already shown FROM SCRIPTURE that the descendants of Ham were NOT black Africans but ARABS -- (excluding Iran which is Persia. Persians are not Arabs).
View attachment 6973
The curse on those Middle Eastern nations was already applied in Bible history (e.g. the Canaanites were meant to be utterly destroyed by Israel), and since the introduction of Islam it has been a curse on the Arab world. And the Arabs were the first slavers also.
While the Bible did not condemn slavery outright, it did not encourage slavery by Christians either, since in the Body of Christ all are brothers and sisters. Slavery was generally a result of warfare. But the slavery which existed in the West was something else. What should not have happened is a Civil War to address slavery. That was plain stupid (and evil).