Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Only remission of sins per obedience to Acts 2:38 can make you "good".I'm good:
"...in the name...of the Son..." = "...in the name of Jesus Christ..."
But thank you anyway. I've been Spirit filled for 35 years.
Easy.What about Acts 8:12-18....they had gotten saved, baptized in Jesus Name, but did not receive the Holy Spirit until Peter and John laid hands on them and then they received the Holy Spirit.
Acts 8 (KJV)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
¹² But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
¹³ Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done.
¹⁴ Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:
¹⁵ Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:
¹⁶ (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)
¹⁷ Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost.
¹⁸ And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money,
You just can't possibly make one size fits all with God.
It already has changed.Yes.
.....Note John was beheaded and who did they hear from about Jesus coming? Could it have been the one Aprilia had to explain more clearly to?Easy.
They were baptized for the remission of sins in Acts 8, exactly like Peter ordered in Acts 2, then Peter came to lay hands on them per the promised Holy Ghost to seal the deal.
Their Acts 2:38 worked out just like Acts 2 did.
They repented and were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins, then Peter was summoned to make sure that all of them were Spirit filled.
Now, that(all of Acts 8) shows us how very important water baptism was to the Apostles.
I'm good:
"...in the name...of the Son..." = "...in the name of Jesus Christ..."
But thank you anyway. I've been Spirit filled for 35 years.
I'll just stay in my unsaved self, thank you. If being saved hinges on the difference between saying "the Son" and "Jesus Christ" at your water baptism then Christianity isn't real for it to matter. I got saved by a real person who cares, not a legal system.Only remission of sins per obedience to Acts 2:38 can make you "good".
Try it, you have everything to gain and a lost soul to lose.
Why not? Right? The Progressives have been changing it for years now, lol. We're not going to let a little scripture stand in our way, are we?Yes.
"the last will be first, and the first will be last." Matthew 20:16...gotcha by 15 years! ...you just have some catching up to do.....lol..
You are an Acts skipper......Note John was beheaded and who did they hear from about Jesus coming? Could it have been the one Aprilia had to explain more clearly to?
Point being the Baptism unto repentance in my understanding was a way to prepare their hearts for the coming of receiving their savior.
But Baptisms were obviously related to teachings....
So after the resurrection that proved Jesus was Lord over the living and dead. THEY HAD TO HEAR THIS FULL GOOD NEWS...U COULD IMAGINE IT WAS ABOUT....THE SAVIOR THAT HAS COME INTO THE World DIED, ROSE, WAS SEEN AND SEATED AT THE RIGHT HAD OF THE FATHER....
SO IF HE TAUGHT THEM what I only could imagine...AND THEY BELIEVED Jesus was the Son of God, savior and Lord. THEY WOULD THEN RECEIVE BAPTISM because they received the teaching. [Man lives by the word]
It may be that in talking to them He knew that they did not receive, Because their responses attitudes and actions...because they only heard the bare minimum about the coming of Jesus.
.....Something really important in Acts was to Show God accepted the Gentiles too...
Now if I was in that day and did not know the above(and even in this day)..I could not know something unless someway it was shown outwardly....For example Laying of Hands And Tongues...but for me these are somewhat Elementary to the beginning of the church ministry.
I say that because of the passage in Hebrews......Where it says let's move forward not laying the foundation again....and what was included?
1Therefore let us leave the elementary teachings about Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith in God, instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. And this we will do, if God permits.
A person knows when they have received new Life....usually you are on fire. You can't hold your peace, you speak with boldness... But it is also continuous in life that we surrender our lives daily...waiting at times for a time of refreshing........Both my husband and I our understanding was opened up...when reading the word...And as we learn to trust Him it happens more....I don't know what other people gifts are...
Is this "legalism"?...I'll just stay in my unsaved self, thank you. If being saved hinges on the difference between saying "the Son" and "Jesus Christ" at your water baptism then Christianity isn't real for it to matter. I got saved by a real person who cares, not a legal system.
The important thing is that people believe and are then baptized for power of witness and holy living. There is no power in a legalistic formula to accomplish those goals. God is not a legalist. We have clear Biblical examples to show us that.You are an Acts skipper.
LOL ... makes me laugh EVERY time.You are an Acts skipper.
No, baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins.The important thing is that people believe and are then baptized for power of witness and holy living. There is no power in a legalistic formula to accomplish those goals. God is not a legalist. We have clear Biblical examples to show us that.
Your legalistic ceremonial order and verbiage is what is being resisted. It's nothing more than 'religion', in every negative connotation of the word. It's important to relate to God through relationship, not legalistic religion which has no spiritual value. Ceremonial legalism will prevent a person from having a spiritual relationship with God, and will suffocate it if they have that relationship with him already. God is a person, not a legal system.Is this "legalism"?...
And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.
Baptism is both word and deed.
Don't get duped by the RCC.
You'll be hard pressed to find anybody who has not been water baptized. You have a meaningless, frivolous argument.No, baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins.
Acts skippers, skip remission of sins.
I detest the Catholic church for the exact reason I detest your doctrine. Legalistic ceremonies have no spiritual value.Don't get duped by the RCC.